Individual Listening Values Moderate the Impact of Verbal Person Centeredness on Helper Evaluations: A Test of the Dual-Process Theory of Supportive Message Outcomes

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, T. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2003). Social support, social networks, and health. In T. L. Thompson, A. M. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 263–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F., Andersen, P. A., & Jensen, A. D. (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 153–180. doi:10.1080/00909887909365204
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., & Gerwing, J. (2011). The listener as addressee in face-to-face dialogue. International Journal of Listening, 25, 178–198. doi:10.1080/10904018.2010.508675
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D. (2011). The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS): Conceptualization and evidence of validity within the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, 59, 277–295. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.583495
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., & Burleson, B. R. (2008). Explaining variations in the effects of supportive messages: A dual-process framework. Communication Yearbook, 32, 355–398.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., & Jones, S. M. (2012). The nature of supportive listening II: The role of verbal person centeredness and nonverbal immediacy. Western Journal of Communication, 76, 250–269. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.651255
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2014). Supportive Communication Theories: Dual-Process Theory of Supportive Message Outcomes and Advice Response Theory. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Shrodt (Eds.), Engaging Theories of Interpersonal Communication (2nd ed., pp. 129–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Vickery, A. J., Cannava, K., & Jones, S. M. (2015). The role of “active listening” in informal helping conversations: Impact on perceptions of listener helpfulness, sensitivity, and supportiveness and discloser emotional improvement. Western Journal of Communication, 79, 151–173. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.943429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Vickery, A. J., & Gearhart, C. C. (2013). The nature of supportive listening I: Exploring the relation between supportive listeners and supportive people. International Journal of Listening, 27, 39–49. doi:10.1080/10904018.2013.732408
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1990). Comforting as everyday social support: Relational consequences of supportive behaviors. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 66–82). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1994). Comforting messages: Features, functions, and outcomes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 135–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2003). Emotional support skills. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551–594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2007). Constructivism: A general theory of communication skill. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 105–128). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2008). What counts as effective emotional support? Explorations of individual and situation differences. In M. T. Motley (Ed.), Studies in applied interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2010). Explaining recipient responses to supportive messages: Development and tests of a dual-process theory. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication (pp. 159–179). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., Holmstrom, A. J., & Gilstrap, C. M. (2005). “Guys can’t say that to guys”: Four experiments assessing the normative motivation account for deficiencies in the emotional support provided by men. Communication Monographs, 72, 468–501. doi:10.1080/03637750500322636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Mortenson, S. R. (2003). Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors: Exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals. Communication Research, 30, 113–146. doi:10.1177/0093650202250873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Rack, J. J. (2008). Constructivism: Explaining individual differences in communication skill. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 51–63). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1990). Effects of cognitive complexity on the perceived importance of communication skills in friends. Communication Research, 17, 165–182. doi:10.1177/009365090017002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassaert, T., van Dulmen, S., Schellevis, F., & Bensing, J. (2007). Active listening in medical consultations: Development of the Active Listening Observation Scale. Patient Education and Counseling, 68, 258–264. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B. (2009). Testing an integrated model of advice-giving in supportive interactions. Human Communication Research, 35, 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Dillard, J. P. (2012). A review and meta-analysis of person-centered messages and social support outcomes. Communication Studies, 63, 99–118. doi:10.7080/10510974.2011.598208
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J. (2009). Sex and gender similarities and differences in communication values in same-sex and cross-sex friendships. Communication Quarterly, 57, 224–238. doi:10.1080/01463370902889455
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J., Bodie, G. D., Burleson, B. R., McCullough, J. D., Rack, J. J., Hanasono, L. K., & Rosier, J. G. (2015). Testing a dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes: How multiple factors influence outcomes in support situations. Communication Research, 42, 526–546. doi:10.1177/0093650213476293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). An initial test of a cognitive-emotional theory of esteem support messages. Communication Research, 38, 326–355. doi:10.1177/0093650210376191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, A. J., Burleson, B. R., & Jones, S. M. (2005). Some consequences for helpers who deliver “cold comfort”: Why it’s worse for women than men to be inept when providing emotional support. Sex Roles, 53, 153–172. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5676-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality: A meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 7, 1–20. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M. (2004). Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helper competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. Communication Research, 32, 338–360. doi:10.1177/0093650204263436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M. (2005). Attachment style differences and similarities in evaluations of affective communication skills and person-centered comforting messages. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M. (2011). Supportive listening. International Journal of Listening, 25, 85–103. doi:10.1080/10904018.2011.536475
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Guerrero, L. K. (2001). Nonverbal immediacy and verbal person-centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 4, 567–596. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Wirtz, J. (2006). How does the comforting process work?: An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Human Communication Research, 32, 217–243. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, G. B., Skurnik, I., & Galinsky, A. D. (1999). The history of dual-process notions, and the future of preconsious control. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 12–36). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 19, 123–205.
   Google Scholar
• Samter, W., & Burleson, B. R. (1990). Evaluations of communication skills as predictors of peer acceptance in a group living situation. Communication Studies, 41, 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Samter, W., & Burleson, B. R. (2005). The role of communication in same-sex friendships: A comparison among African Americans, Asian Americans, and European Americans. Communication Quarterly, 53, 265–283. doi:10.1080/01463370500100982
   Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B., & Cupach, W. R. (2002). Interpersonal skills. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 564–612). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar