References
- An, Y., & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-medated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 485–499. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00023.x
- Anderson, M. (2015). The demographics of device ownership. The Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/the-demographics-ofdeviceownership
- Barnland, D. C. (1970). A transactional model of communication. In J. Akin, A. Goldberg, G. Myers, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Language behavior: A book of readings in communication (pp. 43–61). Paris, France: Mouton.
- Bavelas, J. B., & Segal, L. (1982). Family systems theory: Background and Implications. Journal of Communications, 32(3), 89–107.
- Berger, J., & Iyengar, R. (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 567–579. doi:10.1086/671345
- Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
- Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries: Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1237–1248.
- Chesley, N. (2006). Families in a high-tech age: Technology usage patterns, work and family correlates, and gender. Journal of Family Issues, 27(5), 587–608.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525–535. doi:10.1080/10304310903003270
- Eadicicco, L. (2015). Americans check their phones 8 billion times a day. Retrieved from http://time.com/4147614/smartphone-usage-us-2015/
- Koslovic, A. K. (2003). A human communication approach to interreligious dialogue. Australian Religion Studies Review, 16(1), 49–74.
- Laursen, D. (2012). Sequential organization of text messages and mobile phone calls in interconnected communication sequences. Discourse & Communication, 6(1), 83–99. doi:10.1177/1750481311432517
- Linke, C. (2012). Mobility, media and relational communicative repertoires: An analysis of everyday family interactions. Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture, 3(1), 25–38.
- Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287.
- Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 61, 426–440.
- Quan-Haase, A., & Collins, J. L. (2008). “I’m there, but I might not want to talk to you”: University students’ social accessibility to instant messaging. Information, Communication, & Society, 11(4), 526–543. doi:10.1080/13691180801999043
- Rendle-Short. (2015). Dispreferred responses when texting: Delaying that “no” response. Discourse & Communication, 9(6), 643–661. doi:10.1177/1750481315600309
- Stafford, L., & Hillyer, J. D. (2012). Information and communication technologies in personal relationships. The Review of Communication, 12(4), 290–312. doi:10.1080/15358593.2012.685951
- Storch, S. L., & Ortiz Juarez-Paz, A. V. (2016). The role of mobile devices in 21st century family communication. Paper being presented at the annual conference of National Communication Association, Philadelphia, PA.
- Villegas, A. (2013, October 17). The influence of technology on family dynamics. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association, 2012, 1–17.
- Vincent, J. (2006). Emotional attachment and mobile phones. Knowledge,Technology, & Policy, 19(1), 39–44. doi:10.1007/s12130-006-1013-7
- Yuan, S., Hussain, S. A., Hales, K. D., & Cotten, S. (2016). What do they like? Communication preferences and patterns of older adults in the United States: The role of technology. Educational Gerontology, 42(3), 1–12.