1,101
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How Do Listening Comprehension Processes Differ by Second Language Proficiency? Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives

References

  • Abeywickrama, P. (2013). Why not non-native varieties of English as listening comprehension test input? RELC Journal, 44, 59–74. doi:10.1177/0033688212473270
  • Blau, E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 746–753. doi:10.2307/3587129
  • Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners’ problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System, 32, 363–377. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.05.002
  • Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
  • JACET List of 8000 Basic Words Committee. (2003). JACET list of 8000 basic words. eds. Tokyo, Japan: JACET.
  • Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. (2005). Practical resources for assessing and reporting intercoder reliability in content analysis research projects. Retrieved from http://matthewlombard.com/reliability/index_print.html#
  • Long, D. R. (1989). Second language listening comprehension: A schema-theoretic perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 32–40. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05307.x
  • Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23–36. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.10.005
  • Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York, USA: Routledge.
  • Nix, J.-M. L. (2016). Measuring latent listening strategies: Development and validation of the EFL listening strategy inventory. System, 57, 79–97. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.02.001
  • Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577–607. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990039
  • Tsui, A. B., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics, 19, 432–451. doi:10.1093/applin/19.4.432
  • Tyler, M. D. (2001). Resource consumption as a function of topic knowledge in nonnative and native comprehension. Language Learning, 51, 257–280. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00155
  • van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34, 457–479. doi:10.1093/applin/ams074
  • Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65, 390–416. doi:10.1111/lang.12105
  • Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
  • Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013
  • Zhao, Y. (1997). The effects of listeners’ control of speech rate on second language comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 18, 49–68. doi:10.1093/applin/18.1.49

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.