1,007
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

“We Don’t Have Bullying, But We Have Drama”: Understandings of Bullying and Related Constructs Within the Social Milieu of a U.S. High School

REFERENCES

  • Allen, K. P. (2009). Dealing with bullying and conflict through a collaborative intervention process. School Social Work Journal, 33(2), 70–85.
  • Allen, K. P. (2010a). A bullying intervention system: Reducing risk and creating support for aggressive youth. Preventing School Failure, 54(3), 199–209.
  • Allen, K. P. (2010b). A bullying intervention system in high school: A two-year school-wide follow-up. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(3), 83–120.
  • Allen, K. P. (2012). Off the radar and ubiquitous: Text messaging and its relationship to ‘drama’ and cyberbullying in an affluent, academically rigorous US high school. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(1), 99–117.
  • Allen, K. P. (2013). Understanding bullying in an affluent academically rigorous US high school: A grounded theory analysis. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 23(4), 413–436.
  • Arora, C. M. J., & Thompson, D. A. (1987). Defining bullying for a secondary school. Educational and Child Psychology, 4(3–4), 110–120.
  • Baldwin, M. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461–484.
  • Baldwin, M. (1995). Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(4), 547–552.
  • Baldwin, M. R. (1999). Relational schemas: Research into social-cognitive aspects of interpersonal experience. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 127–154). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332.
  • Billig, M. (1988). Social representation, objectification and anchoring: A rhetorical analysis. Social Behaviour, 3(1), 1–16.
  • boyd, d. (2009). Friendship. In I. Mizuko (Ed.), Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning in new media (pp. 100–136). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cheng, Y.-Y., Chen, L.-M., Ho, H.-C., & Cheng, C.-L. (2011). Definitions of school bullying in Taiwan: A comparison of multiple perspectives. School Psychology International, 32(3), 227–243.
  • Collins, W. B., & Laursen, B. (1992). Conflict and relationships during adolescence. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 216–241). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Craig, K., Bell, D., & Leschied, A. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding school-based bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 21–33.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. (2012). Repetition, power imbalance, and intentionality: Do these criteria conform to teenagers’ perception of bullying? A role-based analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(10), 1889–1910.
  • deLara, E. W. (2012). Why adolescents don’t disclose incidents of bullying and harassment. Journal of School Violence, 11, 288–305.
  • Dodge, K. A. (2011). Context matters in child and family policy. Child Development, 82(1), 533–442.
  • Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemers, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In. D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 161–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Flick, U. (1995). Social representations. In R. Harre, J. Smith, J. VanLangehove, & L. VanLangehove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 70–96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Frisén, A., Holmqvist, K., & Oscarsson, D. (2008). 13-year-olds’ perception of bullying: Definitions, reasons for victimization and experience of adults’ response. Educational Studies, 43(2), 105–117.
  • Furlong, M. J., Sharkey, J. D., Felix, E. D., Tanigawa, D., & Green, J. G. (2010). Bullying assessment: A call for increased precision of self-reporting procedures. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 329–345). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gordillo, I. C. (2011). Divergence in aggressors’ and victims’ perceptions of bullying: A decisive factor for differential psychosocial intervention. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1608–1615.
  • Guerin, S., & Hennessy, E. (2002). Pupils’ definitions of bullying. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 249–261.
  • Guerra, N. G., Williams, K. R., & Sadek, S. (2011). Understanding bullying and victimization during childhood and adolescence: A mixed methods study. Child Development, 82(1), 295–310.
  • Hartup, W. W. (1992). Conflict and friendship relations. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 186–215). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1–13.
  • Hazler, R. J., Carney, J. V., Green, S., Powell, R., & Jolly, L. S. (1997). Areas of expert agreement on identification of school bullies and victims. School Psychology International, 18, 5–14.
  • Holmes, J. G. (2000). Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 447–495.
  • Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of mixed methods research on bullying and peer victimization in school. Educational Review, 64(1), 115–126.
  • Laursen, B. (1993). Conflict management among close peers. In B. Laursen (Ed.), Close friendships in adolescence (pp. 39–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Laursen, B. (1995). Conflict and social interaction in adolescent relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(1), 55–70.
  • Laursen, B. (1996). Closeness and conflict in adolescent peer relationships: Interdependence with friends and romantic partners. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F., Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 186–210). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (1994). Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 197–209.
  • Laursen, B., Hartup, W. W., & Koplas, A. L. (1996). Towards understanding peer conflict. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 76–102.
  • Lee, C. (2006). Exploring teachers’ definitions of bullying. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 11(1), 61–75.
  • Madsen, K. C. (1996). Differing perceptions of bullying and their practical implications. Educational and Child Psychology, 13(2), 14–22.
  • Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). The drama! Teen conflict, gossip, and bullying in networked publics. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926349
  • Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2014). “It’s just drama”: Teen perspectives on conflict and aggression in a networked era. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(19), 1187–1204.
  • Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9–25.
  • Maunder, R. E., Harrop, A., & Tattersall, A. J. (2010). Pupil and staff perceptions of bullying in secondary schools: Comparing behavioural definitions and their perceived seriousness. Educational Research, 52(3), 263–282.
  • Menesini, E., Fonzi, A., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Attribution of meanings to terms related to bullying: A comparison between teachers’ and pupils’ perspectives in Italy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 393–406.
  • Mishna, F. (2004). A qualitative study of bullying from multiple perspectives. Children & Schools, 26(4), 234–247.
  • Mishna, F., Scarcello, I., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 718–738.
  • Mishna, F., Wiener, J., & Pepler, D. (2008). Some of my best friends: Experiences of bullying within friendships. School Psychology International, 29(5), 549–573.
  • Monks, C. P., & Smith, P. K. (2006). Definitions of bullying: Age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 801–821.
  • Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250
  • Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of social representation? In. K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representation of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 8–35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Social cognition: Understanding self and others. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Naylor, P., Cowie, H., Cossin, F., de Bettencourt, R., & Lemme, F. (2006). Teachers’ and pupils’ definitions of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 553–576.
  • Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Powell, H., Mihalas, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Suldo, S., & Daley, C. E. (2008). Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 291–309.
  • Purcell, A. (2012). A qualitative study of perceptions of bullying in Irish primary schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(3), 273–285.
  • Rigby, K. (2002). New perspectives on bullying. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Smith, P. K., & Levan, S. (1995). Perceptions and experiences of bullying in younger pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 489–500.
  • Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S., (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.
  • Swanson, D. P., Spencer, M. B., & Petersen, A. (1998). Identity formation in adolescence. In K. Borman & B. Schneider (Eds.), The adolescent years: Social influences and educational challenges: Ninety-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 18–41). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
  • Swearer, S. M., Siebecker, A. B., Johnsen-Frerichs, L. A., & Wang, C. (2010). Assessment of bullying/victimization: The problem of comparability across studies and methodologies. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 305–327). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K., & Davis, C. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioural Development, 32, 486–495.
  • Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Bellmoff, L., Lopp, E., Birckbichler, L., & Marshall, M. (2008). Missing voices: Fourth through eighth grade urban students’ perceptions of bullying. Journal of School Violence, 7(4), 97–118.
  • Veinot, T. C., Campbell, T. R., Kruger, D., Grodzinski, A., & Franzen, S. (2011). Drama and danger: The opportunities and challenges of promoting youth sexual health through online social networks. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) 2011 Annual Symposium (pp. 1436–1445). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22195207
  • Waldron, L. M. (2011). “Girls are worse”: Drama queens, ghetto girls, tomboys, and the meaning of girl fights. Youth & Society, 43(4), 1298–1344.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.