REFERENCES
- Ashmore, R.D., Deaux, K., & McLauglin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.
- Bergquist, K. L. (2003). Exploring the impact of birth country travel of Korean adoptees. Journal of Family Social Work, 7(4), 45–61.
- Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
- Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (2009). Beyond culture camp: Promoting healthy identity formation in adoption (pp. 1–112). New York, NY: Author.
- Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. D. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
- Hall, J. M., Stevens, P. E., & Meleis, A. I. (1994). Marginalization: A guiding concept for valuing diversity in nursing knowledge development. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(4), 23–41.
- Huh, N. S., & Reid, W. J. (2000). Intercountry, transracial adoption and ethnic identity: A Korean example. International Social Work, 43(1), 75–87.
- Kim, G. S., Suyemoto, K. L., & Turner, C. B. (2010). Sense of belonging, sense of exclusion, and racial and ethnic identities in Korean transracial adoptees. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(2), 179–190. doi:10.1037/a0015727
- Mohanty, J., & Newhill, C. (2006). Adjustment of international adoptees: Implications for practice and a future research agenda. Children & Youth Services Review, 28(4), 384–395. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.04.013
- Mohanty, J., & Newhill, C. (2011). Asian adolescent and young adult adoptees' psychological well-being: Examining the mediating role of marginality. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1189–1195.
- Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Randolph, T., & Holtzman, M. (2010). The role of heritage camps in identity development among Korean transnational adoptees: A relational dialectics approach. Adoption Quarterly, 13(2), 75–99.
- Rojewski, J. W. (2005). A typical American family? How adoptive families acknowledge and incorporate Chinese cultural heritage in their lives. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22(2), 133–164. doi:10.1007/s10560-005-3415-x
- Tan, T. X., & Nakkula, M. (2004). White parents' attitudes towards their adopted Chinese daughters' ethnic identity. Adoption Quarterly, 7(4), 57–76.
- Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London, UK: Academic Press.
- Tuan, M., & Shiao, J. L. (2011). Choosing ethnicity, negotiating race: Korean adoptees in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Yoon, D. P. (2004). Intercountry adoption: The importance of ethnic socialization and subjective well-being for Korean-born adopted children. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work: Innovation in Theory, Research & Practice, 13(2), 71–89.