Registration, Residency Restrictions, and Community Notification: A Social Capital Perspective on the Isolation of Registered Sex Offenders in Our Communities

REFERENCES

• Adam Walsh Act of 2006, Public Law 109-248 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Banaszak, N. (2013, January 27). Bills aim to prevent group living by registered sex offenders. WHNT News. Retrieved from http://whnt.com/2013/01/27/billpreventgroup/.
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore, G. (2001). Young people, trouble, and crime: Restorative justice as a normative theory of informal social control and social support. Youth & Society, 33(2), 199–226. doi:10.1177/0044118x01033002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2008). The forms of capital. In N. W. Biggart (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology (pp. 280–291). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, K. B., & Mingus, W. (2008). Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(3), 356–374. doi:10.1177/0093854807311375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchfield, K. B., & Mingus, W. (2012). Sex offender reintegration: Consequences of the local neighborhood context. American Journal of Criminal Justice. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9195-x
   Google Scholar
• Church, W. T., Wakeman, E. E., Miller, S. L., Clements, C. B., & Sun, F. (2008). Community attitudes toward sex offenders scale: The development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 251–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durling, C. (2006). Never going home: Does it make us safer? Does it make sense? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97(1), 317–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. A., & Miller, G. (2007). Reentry and reintegration: Challenges faced by the families of convicted sex offenders. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20(2), 88–92.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman-Longo, R. E. (1996). Prevention or problem? Sexual Abuse, 8, 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gainesville Police Department. (2012). Sexual offenders. Retrieved from https://www.gainesvillepd.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=94&Itemid=106.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. (1994). Crime and disrepute. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. (2008). The relationship between childhood abuse, psychological symptoms and subsequent sex offending. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 96–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, J. (2008). Criminal history on a “need to know” basis: Employment policies that eliminate the criminal history box on employment applications. Justice Policy Journal, 5(2).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. A., & Burchfield, K. B. (2008). Sex offender residence restrictions in Chicago: An environmental injustice? Justice Quarterly, 25(4), 647–673. doi:10.1080/07418820802119976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob Wetterling Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-322 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. P. (2004). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Junger-Tas, J. (1997). Ethnic minorities and criminal justice in the Netherlands. Crime and Justice, 21, 257–310. doi:10.2307/1147633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, No. 144, 168–69 ( 372 U.S. 1963).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. L., Rukus, J., & Zambrana, K. (2012). Do societal reactions lead to increased experiences of shame and strain for registered female sex offenders? Justice Policy Journal, 9(2), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leib, R. (2003). State policy perspecitves on sexual predator laws. In B. J. Winick & J. Q. LaFond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders (pp. 41–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & Cotter, L. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66. doi:10.1177/1043986204271676
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & Shields, R. T. (2012). Sex offender risk and recidivism in Florida. Retrieved from http://www.lynn.edu/about-lynn/news-and-events/news/media/2012/11/sex-offender-risk-and-recidivism-in-florida-2012
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(1–2), 54–68. doi:10.1007/s12103-008-9055-x
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., Zgoba, K. M., & Tewksbury, R. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Sensible crime policy or flawed logic? Federal Probation, 71(3), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, S. (2008). The labeling of sex offenders. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sex offenders. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, T. L., & Bellair, P. E. (2003). Explaining racial and ethnic differences in adolescent violence: Structural disadvantage, family well-being, and social capital. Justice Quarterly, 20(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mears, D. P., Mancini, C., Gertz, M., & Bratton, J. (2008). Sex crimes, children and pornography: Public views and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 532–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megan’s Law of 1996, Public Law 104-145 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, M. (2005). The sex offender next door: An analysis of recidivism risk factors and deterrence of sex offenders on probation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(2), 211–236.
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, M., Selah, Y., & Wolff, N. (2007). Sex offender laws in America: Can panic-driven legislation ever create safer societies? Criminal Justice Studies, 20(4), 423–443.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, S. F., Baumer, E. P., & Rosenfeld, R. (2004). Dimensions of social capital and rates of criminal homicide. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 882–903. doi:10.1177/000312240406900607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2003). Level 3 sex offenders’ residential placement issues. Minneapolis: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Mocan, H. N., Billups, S. C., & Overland, J. (2005). A dynamic model of differential human capital and criminal activity. Economica, 72(288), 655–681. doi:10.2307/3548949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 329–350. doi:10.1080/01639620600605606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchowsky, S., & Iwama, J. (2009). Improving state criminal history records: Recidivism of sex offenders released in 2001. Retrieved from http://www.jrsa.org/projects/sex-offender-final-report.pdf#xml=http://69.46.26.162/texis/search/pdfhi.txt?query=orchowsky&pr=default&prox=page&rorder=500&rprox=500&rdfreq=500&rwfreq=500&rlead=500&rdepth=0&sufs=0&order=r&cq=&id=50c2e5fb7
   Google Scholar
• Palone, G. (2012, August 20). Ever-growing tent city of sex offenders has neighbors worried. Central Florida News. Retrieved from http://www.cfnews13.com/content/news/cfnews13/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2012/8/20/ever_growing_tent_ci.html
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2000). Sex crimes and the new punitiveness. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 135–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, J. L., Badzinski, D. M., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan’s Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 356–379.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2002). Social capital among women offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 167–187. doi:10.1177/1043986202018002004
   Google Scholar
• Residency Restrictions for Persons Convicted of Certain Sex Crimes. F.S. 775.215 Stat. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. J. (2009). The sex offender under the bridge: Has Megan’s Law run amok. Rutgers Law Review, 62, 1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, R., Messner, S. F., & Baumer, E. P. (2001). Social capital and homicide. Social Forces, 80(1), 283–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiavone, S. K., & Jeglic, E. L. (2009). Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(6), 679–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith v. Doe, No. 84, 105 (538 U.S. 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Socia, K. (2011). The policy implications of residence restrictions on sex offender housing in Upstate NY. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(2), 351–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, J. D., & Becker, J. V. (2011). Sexual offenders with serious mental illness: Prevention, risk and clinical concerns. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34, 239–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, C. G., Rohrer, G., & Crow, M. S. (2010). Is criminal justice education ready for reentry? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 60–76.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68(3), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminology, 21, 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Connor, D. P. (2012). Incarcerated sex offenders’ perceptions of family relationships: Previous experiences and future expectations. Western Criminology Review, 13(2), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Zgoba, K. M. (2010). Perceptions and coping with punishment: How registered sex offenders respond to stress, internet restrictions, and collateral consequences of registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(4), 537–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States v. Kebodeaux, No. 12-418 (570 U.S. 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Visher, C. A., Yahner, J., & LaVigne, N. (2010). Life after prison: Tracking the experiences of male prisoners returning to Chicago, Cleveland and Houston. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Zanbergen, P., & Hart, T. (2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS. Journal of Research and Policy, 8(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zevitz, R., & Farkas, M. A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(2/3), 375–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar