Reaching out and institutionalizing multiple kinship relationships in the social environment: Ampangnaopat among Simalungunese, Indonesia

References

• Anggara Damanik’s, personal communication, August 22, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Aryal, R. (2018). Kinship as social capital in rural development: An anthropological perspective. Dhaulagiri: Journal of Sociology & Anthropology, 12, 88–97. h ttps://d oi.org/103126/dsaj.v12i0.22184
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H. R. (1979). Chinese family, and kinship. Palgrave. h ttps://d oi.org/101007/9781349861231
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, J. (2013). Other cultures: Aims, methods, and achievements in social anthropology. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315017648
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguins Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L. (2015). Family theory: Competing perspectives in social demography. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral (second edition), 815–820. h ttps://d oi.org/101016/B9780080970868310959
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, E. M. (1992). Kerabat dan bukan Kerabat [Relatives and non-Relatives]. In T. O. Ichromi (Ed.), Pokok-Pokok Antropologi Budaya [Principles of cultural anthropology] (pp. 57–69). Obor Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. (ed.). (2000). Cultures of relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. J. (2012). Goode’s world revolution and family patterns: Reconsideration at fifty years. Population and Development Review, 38(4), 577–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comte, A. (1998). Auguste Comte, and positivism: The essential writings. (G. Lanzer, ed.). Transactions Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark’s, V. L. (eds). (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2016a). Ritus peralihan: Upacara adat Simalungun seputar kelahiran, perkawinan, penghormatan kepada orangtua dan kematian [Rites passage: Simalungun traditional ceremonies around birth, marriage, respect for parents and death]. Simetri Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2016b). Busana Simalungun: Politik busana, peminjaman selektif dan modernitas [Simalungun clothing: The politics of clothing, selective borrowing and modernity]. Simetri Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2017a). Tortor: Gerak ritmis, ekspresi berpola dan maknanya bagi orang Simalungun [Tortor: Rhythmic movements, patterned expressions and their meaning for the Simalungunese]. Simetri Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2017b). Agama, perubahan sosial dan identitas etnik: Moralitas agama dan kultural di Simalungun [Religion, social change and ethnic identity: Religious and cultural morality in Simalungun]. Simetri Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2018). Rekayasa budaya dan dinamika sosial: Menemukan pokok pikiran lokalitas budaya sebagai daya cipta [Cultural engineering and social dynamics: Finding the main idea of cultural locality as creativity]. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences, 1(1): 93–104. https://doi.org/93-104.doi.10.34007/jehss.v1i2.9
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2019). Hiou, Soja dan Tolugbalanga: Narasi Foto Penampilan Elitis pada Busana Tradisional Simalungun. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 21(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v21i1.800
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2020). Mengekalkan kekerabatan: Struktur lima saodoran pada upacara perkawinan etnik Simalungun [Kinship imperishable: The structure of five saodorans at the Simalungun ethnic wedding ceremony]. Walasuji: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Budaya, 11(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36869/wjsb.v11i1.67
   Google Scholar
• Damanik, E. L. (2021). Dispute resolution: Pentagonal relationships in the Simalungun Ethnic Group. Asia-Pacific Social Sciences Review, 21(1), 211–223. http://apssr.com/volume-21-no-1/dispute-resolution-pentagonal-relationships-in-the-simalungun-ethnic-group/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (1959). The myth of functional analysis as a special method in sociology and anthropology. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 757–772. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2088563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, I. (2005). The Sage Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Djalins, U. (2015). Becoming Indonesian citizens: Subjects, citizens, and land ownership in the Netherlands Indies, 1930-1937. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 46(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463415000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dousset, L. (2011). Understanding human relations (kinship systems). In N. Thieberger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork (pp. 209–234). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhd/9780199571888.013.0010
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1938). Rules of sociological method. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic People. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, J. (2005). Sociology. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry Purba’s, personal communication, October 2, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (2001). Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., & McKinnon, S. (2001). Relative values: Reconfiguring kinship studies. North Carolina. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furstenberg, F. F. (2020). Kinship reconsidered: Research on a neglected topic. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 364–382. h ttps://d oi.org/101111/jomf.12628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2008). The origin of kinship in Oceania: Lewis Henry Morgan and Lorimer Fison. Oceania, 78(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.2008.tb00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, N., & Moynihan, D. P. (1963). Beyond the melting pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, W. J. (1963). Perspectives on family research and life insurance. American Behavioral Scientist, 6(9), 55–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426300600916
   Google Scholar
• Goodenough, W. H. (1976). MULTICULTURALISM AS THE NORMAL HUMAN EXPERIENCE. Council on Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 7(4), 4–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1976.7.4.05x1652n
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., & Hall, J. N. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 119–143). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, G. L., & Saviet, M. (2020). In-law relationships among interracial couples: A preliminary view. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(5), 605–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1732254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, P. (2006). Dravidian kinship systems in Africa. L’Homme: Revue française d’anthropologie, 395–407. https://journals.openedition.org/lhomme/21745doi:10.4000/Ihomme.21745
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, J. (ed.) 1999. Family, kinship, and marriage. An Introduction to Social Anthropology. 181–206. Palgrave. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978134927281512
   Google Scholar
• Henley, D., & Davidson, J. (2008). In the Name of Adat : Regional Perspectives on Reform, Tradition, and Democracy in Indonesia. Modern Asian Studies, 42(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X07003083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidayat & Damanik, E.L. (2018). Batak dan bukan Batak: Paradigma sosiohistoris tentang konstruksi identitas etnik di Kota Medan, 1906-1939 [Batak and not-Batak: Sociohistorical paradigm of ethnic identity construction in Medan City, 1906-1939]. Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha, 3(2): 71–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jscl.v3i2.19624
   Google Scholar
• Hisarma Saragih, personal communication, October 2, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Holy, L. (1996). Anthropological perspectives on kinship. Pluto Press. h ttps://d oi.org/102307/j.ctt18mvnwk
   Google Scholar
• Itao, K., & Kaneko, K. (2020). Evolution of kinship structures driven by marriage tie and competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5), 2378–2384. h ttps://d oi.org/101073/pnas1917716117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2015). The institution of the family, marriage, kinship, and descent. In Abasi-Ekong Edet (Ed.). Selected Topics in Nigeria Peoples and Culture (pp. 21–22. Abasi-Ekong). Benin City: Dimaf Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come’. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2000). Group nepotism and human kinship. Current Anthropology, 41(5), 779–809. h ttps://d oi.org/101086/317406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. (2017). Kinship in mind: Three approaches. In W. Shapiro (Ed.), Focality and extension in kinship: Essays in memory of Harold Scheffler (pp. 343–367). Australian National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., & Manners, R. A. (1974). Culture theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Keesing, R. M. (1971). Cultural anthropology: A contemporary perspective. New York: Holt. Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kottak, C. P. (2006). Anthropology: The exploration of human diversity. McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, A. (1959). The social anthropology of Radcliffe-Brown. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. (J. Harle Bell & J. R. von Sturmer, eds). Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, R. (1936). The study of man: An introduction. D. Appleton-Century Company.
   Google Scholar
• Maleta, Y. (2015). Nurturing Identity and the “Role of Mother” within Professional and Grassroots Australian Environmental Advocacy. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 10(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1621/CGP/v10i04/53333
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelago of Melanesian New Guinea. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1939). The group and the individual in functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 938–964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/218181
   Google Scholar
• Manners, R. A., & Kaplan, D. (1968). Theory in anthropology: A source-book. Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Marohabutr, T. (2016). Social capital in Thai social enterprises and related communities. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 16(1), 18–31. http://apssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2.Research-Article_Marohabutr-070416.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marzali, A. (2006). Struktural-Fungsionalisme [Structural-functionalism]. Antropologi Indonesia: Indonesian Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 30(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v30i2.3558
   Google Scholar
• Matulessy Damanik’s, personal communication, September 27, 2019
   Google Scholar
• McConvell, P., & Gardner, H. (2016). The unwritten Kamilaroi and Kurnai: Unpublished kinship schedules collected by Fison and Howitt. In K. A. Peter, H. Koch, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Language, land & song: Studies in honour of Luise Hercus (pp. 194–208). EL Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. H. (1871). System of consanguinity and affinity of the human family. Washington City: Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Muda, I., & Suharyanto, A. (2020). Analysis of life’s inter-religious harmony based on the philosophy of Dalihan na Tolu in Sipirok Sub-district, South Tapanuli Regency, North Sumatera Province. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(5), 533–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1708526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ottenheimer, M. (2007). Kinship and Family: An Anthropological Reader (review). Anthropological Quarterly, 80(2), 597–610. h ttps://d oi.org/101353/anq20070032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overing, J., Fortis, P., & Margiotta, M. (2015). Kinship in anthropology. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral, 36–43. h ttps://d oi.org/101016/B9780080970868120987
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, R. (1997). Review of anthropological perspectives on kinships. Critique of Anthropology, 17(1), 453–454. h ttps://d oi.org/101177/0308275X9701700410
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45(1), 22–38. h ttps://d oi.org/101525/aa194345102a00030
   Google Scholar
• Patrojani, P. D., & Afiff, S. (2018). Kekerabatan sebagai pranata sosial yang mempengaruhi agency perlawanan masyarakat: Studi kasus protes petani terhadap proyek pembangunan irigasi di Sumatera Barat [Kinship as a social institution influencing community resistance agencies: A case study of farmers’ protests against irrigation development projects in West Sumatra]. Antropologi Indonesia: Indonesian Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 39(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v39i2.11305
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. P. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peletz, M. G. (1995). Kinship studies in late twentieth-century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 343–372. h ttps://d oi.org/101146/annurev.an.24.100195.002015
   Google Scholar
• Pelly, U. (2021). Prof. Bruner’s coming home ke Tanah Batak: Kisah seorang Antropolog pulang kampung [Prof. Bruner’s coming home to Batakland: The story of an anthropologist returning to his hometown]. Casa Mesra Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Piang, T. N., Osmar, Z. Z., & Mahadir, N. V. (2017). Structure or relationships? Rethinking family influences on juvenile delinquency in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 17(2), 171–184. http://apssr.com/volume-17-no-2/structure-or-relationship-rethinking-family-in%EF%AC%82uences-on-juvenile-delinquency-in-malaysia/
   Google Scholar
• Purba, M., & Damanik, E. L. (2019). Memahami adat perkawinan Simalungun: Pinaikkat, Naniasokan & Marlualua serta implikasi sosialnya [Understanding the Simalungun marriage customs: Pinaikkat, Naniasokan & Marlualua and their social implications]. Simetri Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Purwanto, S. A., & Haryono, H. (2019). Dimensi adat dan dinamika komunitas Dayak di Kalimantan Timur. [Custom dimensions and dynamics of the Dayak community in East Kalimantan]. Antropologi Indonesia: Indonesian Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 40(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v40i1.11950
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1922). The Andaman Islanders: A study in social anthropology. The University Press in Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On social structure. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 70(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2844197
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rauscher, E. (2016). Passing It On: Parent-to-Adult Child Financial Transfers for School and Socioeconomic Attainment. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(6), 172–196. h ttps://d oi.org/107758/RSF20162609
   Google Scholar
• Read, D. W. (2001). What is kinship? In R. Feinberg & M. Ottenheimer (Eds.), The cultural analysis of kinship: The legacy of David Schneider and its implications for anthropological relativism (pp. 1–62). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., & Peel, E. (2016). Critical kinship studies: An introduction to the field. Palgrave Macmillan. h ttps://d oi.org/101057/9781137505057
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (1988). Contemporary sociological theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, R. (1988). Contemporary sociological theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. R. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave the biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saragih, H., Sublihar, S., Harahap, H., & Purba, A. (2019). The struggle of Batak Simalungun for their identity in Church organization in Simalungun, Medan, Indonesia. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(6), 693–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1590888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M. (1984). A critique of the study of kinship. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D.M. (1984). A critique of the study of kinship. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schutt, R. K. (2016). Understanding the social world: Research Methods for the 21st century. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schutt, R. K. (2017). Investigating the social world. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, W. (ed.). (2018). Focality and extension in kinship essays in memory of Harold W. Scheffler. ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shenk, M. K., & Mattison, S. M. (2011). The rebirth of kinship. Human Nature, 22(1–2), 1–15. h ttps://d oi.org/101007/s12110-011-9105-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. (2013). Warumungu kinship system overtime. In P. McConvell, I. Keen, & R. Hendery (Eds.), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction (pp. 239–254). University of Utah Press. h ttps://d oi.org/1013140/RG223413880324
   Google Scholar
• Singarimbun, M. (1975). Kinship, Descent, and Alliance among the Karo Batak. University of Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. W., & Preston, F. W. (1982). Sociology: An Introduction. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, H. (1896). The study of sociology. D. Appleton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Steedly, M. M. (1983). Hanging without a Rope: Narrative experience in colonial and postcolonial Karoland. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8pzbfx
   Google Scholar
• Tambak, T. B. A., & Damanik, E. L. (2019). Sejarah Simalungun: Pemerintahan tradisional, kolonialisme, agama dan adat istiadat [History of Simalungun: Traditional government, colonialism, religion and customs]. Simetri Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. W. (2013). Kinship matters: structures of alliance, indigenous foragers, and the austronesian diaspora. Human Biology, 85(1–3), 359–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3378/027.085.0317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wormer, K. (2019). “I always expected to have grandchildren some day”: The long road from sense of loss to gradual acceptance. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1515685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdon, M. (1981). Kinship, marriage, and the family: An operational approach. American Journal of Sociology, 86(4), 796–818. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/227317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. A. (2016). Kinship Past, Kinship Present: Bio-Essentialism in the Study of Kinship. American Anthropologist, 118(3), 570–584. h ttps://d oi.org/101111/aman12607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar