A Polytomous Item Response Theory Analysis of Social Physique Anxiety Scale

REFERENCES

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: IBM.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, J., & Sabiston, C. M. (2009). Social physique anxiety and physical activity: A self-determination theory perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 329–335. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basis concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H., Mazzeo, J., & Roussos, L. (1996). Detecting DIF for polytomously scored items: An adaptation of the SIBTEST procedure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 333–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A. E., Ullrich-French, S., Madonia, J., & Witty, K. (2011)Social physique anxiety in physical education: Social contextual factors and links to motivation and behaviour. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 555–562. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, P. R. E., Sabiston, C. M., Kowalski, K. C., McDonough, M. H., & Kowalski, N. P. (2006). Longitudinal assessment of the relationship between physical self-concept and health related behaviour and emotion in adolescent girls. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, J., & Duda, J. L. (2012). Profiles of perfectionism, body-related concerns, and indicators of psychological health in vocational dance students: An investigation of the 2 × 2 model of perfectionism. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 729–738. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ayala, R. J. (1993). An introduction to polytomous item response theory models. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 172–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, B. G., Koch, W. R., & De Ayala, R. J. (1989). Operational characteristics of adaptive testing using the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurment, 13, 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, R. C. (1998). With regard to the social physique anxiety scale: Conceptually speaking. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20, 225–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, R. C., Kelley, B., & Wilson, P. (1997). The social physique anxiety scale: Men, women, and the effects of modifying Item 2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, R. C., Mack, D., & Hart, E. A. (1996). Factorial validity of the social physique anxiety scale for females. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. B., & Hattie, J. A. (2004). An examination of the psychometric properties of the physical self-description questionnaire using a polytomous item response model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 423–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L., & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, A. M., & Prapavessis, H. (2001). Social physique anxiety and eating attitudes in female athletic and non-athletic groups. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 4, 396–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J. H., & Wang, C. K. J. (2005). Physical self-perceptions in adolescence: Generalizability of a multidimensional, hierarchical model across gender and grade. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 297–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., & Stevenson, A. (2010). Social physique anxiety and physical self-esteem: Gender and age effects. Psychology & Health, 25, 89–110. doi:10.1080/08870440903160990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausenblas, H. A., Brewer, B. W., & Van Raalte, J. L. (2004). Self-presentation and exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howle, T. C., & Eklund, R. C. (2013). The effect of induced self-presentation concerns on cognitive appraisal and affect. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 26, 700–710. doi:10.1080/10615806.2013.763934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the revised personal style inventory: Evidence for the multidimensionality problem for perfectionism. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 61, 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, N. P., Crocker. P. R. E, & Kowalski, K. C. (2001). Physical self and physical activity relationships in college women: Does social physique anxiety moderate effects? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 55–62. DOI:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608932
   Google Scholar
• Kruisselbrink, D. L., Dodge, A. M., Swanburg, S. L., & MacLeod, A. L. (2004). Influence of same-sex and mixed-sex exercise settings on the social physique anxiety of males and females. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 616–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. (1992). Self-presentational processes in exercise and sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 14, 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, D. E., Strong, H. A., Kowalski, K. C., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2007). Does friendship matter? An examination of social physique anxiety in adolescence. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 37, 1248–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, C. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K., Rejeski, W. J., Leary, M. R., McAuley, E., & Bane, S. (1997). Is the social physique anxiety scale really multidimensional? Conceptual and statistical arguments for a unidimensional model. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Ginis, K. A., & Leary, M. R. (2004). Self-presentation processes in health-damaging behaviour. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Ginis, K. A., Murru, E., Conlin, C., & Strong, H. A. (2011). Construct validation of a state version of the social physique anxiety scale among young women. Body Image, 8, 52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsma, E. V., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Malina, R. M. (2008). Relationship of social physique anxiety to indicators of physique. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 417–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosewich, A. D., Kowalski, K. C., Sabiston, C. M., Sedgwick, W. A., & Tracy, J. L. (2011). Self-compassion: A potential resource for young women athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 103–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motl, R. W., & Conroy, D. E. (2000). Validity and factor invariance of the social physique anxiety scale. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 1007–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prapavessis, H., Grove, J. R., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). Self-presentation issues in competition and sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussos, L., & Stout, W. (1996). A multidimensionality-based DIF Paradigm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabiston, C. M., Sedgwick, W. A., Crocker, P. R. E., Kowalski, K. C., & Mack, D. E. (2007). Social physique anxiety in adolescence: an exploration of influences, coping strategies, and health behaviours. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 78–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of a latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monographs, 34( Suppl. 4).
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Shealy, R., & Stout, W. F. (1993a). An item response theory model for test bias. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer ( Eds.), Differential item functioning ( pp. 197–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shealy, R., & Stout, W. F. (1993b). A model-based standardization approach that separates true DIF/bias from group differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika, 58, 159–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. L. (2004). Measurement of social physique anxiety in early adolescence. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG: Multiple category item analysis and test scoring using item response theory [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar