Studying the process of diesel fuel catalytic dewaxing using the unsteady mathematical model

References

• Belinskaya, N. S., E. V. Frantsina, and E. D. Ivanchina. 2019. Unsteady-state mathematical model of diesel fuels catalytic dewaxing process. Catalysis Today 329:214–20. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingzhu, W. 1986. Dewaxing of diesel fuel. Applied Catalysis 20 (1-2):315. doi:10.1016/0166-9834(86)80025-2.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, F. A. N., and Teles, U. M. 2007. Modeling and optimization of Fischer–Tropsch products hydrocracking. Fuel Processing Technology 88 (2):207–14. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantsina, E., N. Belinskaya, and E. Ivanchina. 2018. Intensification of the processes of dehydrogenation and dewaxing of middle distillate fractions by redistribution of hydrogen between the units. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 35 (2):337–47. doi:10.1007/s11814-017-0284-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudanova, A. I., L. A. Gulyaeva, L. A. Krasilnikova, O. I. Shmelkova, and R. E. Boldushevskii. 2017. Jet fuel and arctic diesel fuel production by isodewaxing of waxy middle distillate fractions. Fuel 193:485–7. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, S., R. Heck, and M. Ehlers. 1997. Production of high cetane diesel fuel by employing hydrocracking and catalytic dewaxing techniques. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 125 (2-3):160–1. doi:10.1016/S1381-1169(98)80041-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kameshkov, A. V., V. I. Fedorov, and K. V. Semikin. 2016. Influence of hydrodewaxing process parameters on low temperature properties of diesel fraction. Petroleum Refining and Petrochemistry 4:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kirgina, M. V., I. Bogdanov, A. A. Altynov, and N. S. Krinitsyn. 2019. Feasibility studies of jet fuels using as a low-temperature additive to straight-run diesel fuels. Petroleum and Coal 61 (1):120–7.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, E. O. 2007. Catalytic dewaxing with zeolites for improved profitability of ULSD production. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 170:1292–99. doi:10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80990-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbilieva, K., and L. Petrov. 2011. Deactivation modes of solid catalysts with different active sites. Chinese Journal of Catalysis 32 (1-2):51–9. doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(10)60159-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebedev, B. L., I. P. Afanasyev, A. V. Ishmurzin, S. Yu. Talalaev, V. E. Shteba, A. V. Kameshkov, and P. I. Domnin. 2015. Production of winter diesel fuel in Russia. Petroleum Refining and Petrochemistry 4:19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W., and S. K. Ihm. 2014. Hydroisomerization and hydrocracking over platinum loaded ZSM-23 catalysts in the presence of sulfur and nitrogen compounds for the dewaxing of diesel fuel. Fuel 134:237–43. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Y. Xia, and W. Zeng. 2013. Kinetic mechanism research of an industrial hydrocracker based on strict calculation of stoichiometric coefficients. Fuel 103:285–91. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. S., M. Tayakout-Fayolle, M. Ropars, and C. Geantet. 2013. Hydroconversion of an atmospheric residue with a dispersed catalyst in a batch reactor: Kinetic modeling including vapor-liquid equilibrium. Chemical Engineering Science 94:214–23. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. P., J. J. Verstraete, and M. Kolb. 2014. Simulating vacuum residue hydroconversion by means of Monte-Carlo techniques. Catalysis Today 220-222:208–20. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2013.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, L., S. Bonomi, S. Gamba, V. Calemma, and D. Molinari. 2007. The “all components hydrocracking model.” Chemical Engineering Science 62 (18-20):5013–20. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufer, A., A. Werner, and W. Reschetilowski. 2013. A study on the bifunctional isomerization of n-decane using a superior combination of design of experiments and kinetic modeling. Chemical Engineering Science 87:160–72. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2012.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasanker, S., A. Ramaswamy, and P. Ratnasamy. 1996. Design of catalyst and process for the dewaxing of petroleum oils. Applied Catalysis A: General 138 (2):369–79. doi:10.1016/0926-860X(95)00308-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandegehuchte, B. D., J. W. Thybaut, C. Detavernier, D. Deduytsche, J. Dendooven, J. A. Martens, S. P. Sree, T. I. Korányi, and G. B. Marin. 2014. A single-event assessment of n-alkane hydroconversion on ultrastable Y zeolites after Atomic Layer Deposition of alumina. Journal of Catalysis 311:433–46. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagoruiko, A. N., A. S. Belyi, M. D. Smolikov, and A. S. Noskov. 2014. Unsteady-state kinetic simulation of naphtha reforming and coke combustion processes in the fixed and moving catalyst beds. Catalysis Today 220-222:168–77. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2013.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar