Optimizing petrophysical parameters of heterogeneous coal bed methane reservoir using numerical investigations

References

• Ali, M., S. Paul, and R. Chatterjee. 2017. Cleat orientation from ground mapping and image log studies for in-situ stress analysis: Coal bed methane exploration in South Karanpura Coalfield, India. Energy & Fuels 31 (7):6812–24. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingxiang, X., L. Xiangfang, H. Manouchehr, D. Xiyao, Y. Xinzhou, C. Dong, and Z. Yuyang. 2013. An analytical model for desorption area in coal-bed methane production wells. Fuel 106:766–72. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E. T., and E. Hoek. 1978. Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 15 (4):211–5. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(78)91227-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, R., and S. Paul. 2013. Classification of coal seams for coal bed methane exploitation in Central Part of Jharia Coalfield, India – A statistical approach. Fuel 111:20–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, R., S. Paul, and P. K. Pal. 2019. Relation between coalbed permeability and in-situ stress magnitude for coalbed methane exploration in Jharia and Raniganj coalfields, India. The Leading Edge 38 (10):800–7. doi:10.1190/tle38100800.1.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, C. R., and F. Qanbari. 2016. A semi-analytical method for forecasting wells completed in low permeability, undersaturated CBM reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 30:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durucan, S., M. Ahsan, and J. Q. Shi. 2009. Matrix shrinkage and swelling characteristics of European coals. Energy Procedia 1 (1):3055–62. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.084.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Q., J. Liu, Z. Huang, and M. Tian. 2018. Study on the optimization of fracturing parameters and interpretation of CBM fractured wells. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience 3 (2):109–17. doi:10.1016/j.jnggs.2018.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Gehne, S., and P. M. Benson. 2019. Permeability enhancement through hydraulic fracturing: Laboratory measurements combining a 3D printed jacket and pore fluid over-pressure. Scientific Reports 9 (1):12573. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49093-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, I. 1987. Reservoir engineering in coal seams: Part 1. The physical process of gas storage and movement in coal seams. SPE Reservoir Engineering 2 (01):28–34. doi:10.2118/12514-PA.
   Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan, G., J. Chand, and R. Chatterjee. 2020. Impact of geomechanics in coal bed methane development and production, Barakar coals in central India. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 194:107515. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., Z. Wang, L. Shi, and R. Feng. 2017. Analysis of analytical models developed under the uniaxial strain condition for predicting coal permeability during primary depletion. Energies 10 (11):1849. doi:10.3390/en10111849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., S. Hongqing, Y. Jiaosheng, H. Xiaohe, and D. He. 2013. Productivity equation of fractured well in CBM reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 11:39–45. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. A. 2012. Coalbed methane: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology 101:36–81. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. A., and S. J. Zarrouk. 2011. The origin and significance of gas saturation in coalbed methane plays: Implications for Indonesia, Proceedings. Indonesian Petroleum Association. Thirty-fifth Annual Convention & Exhibition. Paper IPA11-G-195. Indonesian Petroleum Association.Jakarta, Indonesia, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Nainar, S., and S. K. Govindarajan. 2021. Semi-analytic analysis and optimization of stress-dependent permeability model for the coal bed methane gas reservoir. Environmental Earth Sciences 80 (7):272. doi:10.1007/s12665-021-09500-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, S., and R. Chatterjee. 2011. Determination of in-situ stress direction from cleat orientation mapping for coal bed methane exploration in south-eastern part of Jharia coalfield, India. International Journal of Coal Geology 87 (2):87–96. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, L., T. Dazhen, P. Zhejun, X. Hao, and H. Weiqiang. 2013. Characterization of the stress sensitivity of pores for different rank coals by nuclear magnetic resonance. Fuel 111:746–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weniger, S., P. Weniger, and R. Littke. 2016. Characterizing coal cleats from optical measurements for CBM evaluation. International Journal of Coal Geology 154-155:176–92. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2015.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, T.-q., F. Gao, J.-h. Kang, and X.-x. Wang. 2016. A fully coupling coal–gas model associated with inertia and slip effects for CBM migration. Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (7):582. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5378-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., X. Peng, and X. Liu. 2012. The stress sensitivity of coal bed methane wells and impact on production. Procedia Engineering 31:571–9. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1069.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., J. Liu, and D. Elsworth. 2008. How sorption induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: A new FE model. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 45 (8):1226–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., C. Wu, Z. Wang, and D. Xu. 2019. Post fracturing permeability prediction for CBM well with the analysis of fracturing pressure decline. Energy Science & Engineering 7 (6):3111–23. doi:10.1002/ese3.483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, J., Z. Ma, Y. Ge, and C. Li. 2021. Influences of coal properties on the principle permeability tensor during primary coalbed methane recovery: A parametric study. Geofluids 2021:1–17. doi:10.1155/2021/2097503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar