A value-centric business model framework for managing open data applications

References

• Afuah, A. 2014. Business model innovation: Concepts, analysis, and cases. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Afuah, A., and C. L. Tucci. 2001. Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Albano, C. S., and N. Reinhard. 2014. Open government data: Facilitating and motivating factors for coping with potential barriers in the Brazilian Context. In EGOV 2014, Dublin, Ireland, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 8653, ed. M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, and F. Bannister, 181–193. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Debei, M. M., and D. Avison. 2010. Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems 19(3):359–376. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos, C., A. Zuiderwijk, Y. Charapabidis, E. Loukis, and M. Janssen. 2014. Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. In EGOV 2014, Dublin, Ireland, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 8653, ed. M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, and F. Bannister, 230–241. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Amit, R., and C. Zott. 2001. Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7):493–520. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R., and C. Zott. 2012. Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 53(3):41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri, M. A., and K. Alshare. 2008. A path analytic model and measurement of the business value of e-government: An international perspective. International Journal of Information Management 28(6):524–535. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, E. 2008. How to measure the value in value chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38(9):685–698. doi:10.1108/09600030810925971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batagan, L. 2014. The role of open government data in urban area development. Informatica Economica 18(2):80–87. doi:10.12948/issn14531305/18.2.2014.08.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, J. 2014. The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary Neoliberal state: The case of open government data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 31(3):388–395. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalabidis, Y., E. Loukis, and C. Alexopoulos 2014. Evaluating second generation open government data infrastructure using value models. HICSS-47: Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 2114–2126. Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, I., III. 2001. Emerging value propositions for M-commerce. Journal of Business Strategies 18(2):133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Conradie, P., and S. Choenni. 2014. On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly 31(S1):S10–S17. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, S., A. Gangemi, A. G. Nuzzolese, S. Peroni, V. Presutti, D. R. Recupero, and D. Spampinato. 2014. Geolinked open data for the municipality of Catania. In WIMS 2014: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, Vol. 58, 1–58. Thessaloniki, Greece: ACM ICPS.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, R., M. Martinsons, and N. Kock. 2004. Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal 14(1):65–86. doi:10.1111/isj.2004.14.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Reuver, M., H. Bouwman, and T. Haaker. 2009. Mobile business models: Organizational and financial design issues that matter. Electronic Markets 19(1):3–13. doi:10.1007/s12525-009-0004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Reuver, M., S. Stein, and J. F. Hampe. 2013. From eParticipation to mobile participation: Designing a service platform and business model for mobile participation. Information Polity 18(1):57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, L., T. Lebo, J. S. Erickson, D. DiFranzo, G. T. Williams, X. Li, J. Michaelis, A. Graves, J. G. Zheng, Z. Shangguan, J. Flores, D. L. McGuinness, and J. A. Hendler. 2011. TWC LOGD: A portal for linked open government data ecosystems. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 9(3):325–333. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2011.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, A., and V. Brasse. 2014. How to ensure the economic viability of an open data platform. Procedia Computer Science 33:179–182. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.030.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Open data: An engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0882:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed December 3, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Feller, J., P. Finnegan, and O. Nilsson. 2011. Open innovation and public administration: Transformational typologies and business model impacts. European Journal of Information Systems 20(3):358–374. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, E., and M. Osella 2013. Eight business model archetypes for PSI re-use. Open Data on the Web Workshop, Google Campus, London, UK. http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/odw13_submission_27.pdf (accessed October 12, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fong, P. S., Q. Shen, and E. W. L. Cheng. 2001. A framework for benchmarking the value management process. Benchmarking: An International Journal 8(4):306–316. doi:10.1108/14635770110403800.
   Google Scholar
• Germanakos, P., N. Tsianos, Z. Lekkas, C. Mourlas, and G. Samaras. 2008. Improving m-commerce services effectiveness with the use of user-centric content delivery. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations 6(1):1–18. doi:10.4018/JECO.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsley, M., and A. Meehan. 2007. E-government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems 16(2):134–148. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendler, J., J. Holm, C. Musialek, and G. Thomas. 2012. US Government linked open data: Semantic.data.gov. IEEE Intelligent Systems 27(3):25–31. doi:10.1109/MIS.2012.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. D., J. Moon, J. K. Kim, and Y. C. Choe. 2011. Impacts of organizational assimilation of e-government systems on business value creation: A structuration theory approach. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10(5):576–594. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITU. 2011. Understanding m-government adoption. M-Government Mobile Technologies for Responsive Governments and Connected Societies, 51–60. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IVM 2014. Gain Value Management Rewards. Online document of The Institute of Value Management. http://ivm.org.uk/benefits-and-rewards-of-value-management (accessed April 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., E. Estevez, and T. Janowski. 2014. Interoperability in big, open, and linked data-organizational maturity capabilities, and data portfolios. IEEE Computer 47(10):44–49. doi:10.1109/MC.2014.290.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., and G. Kuk. 2007. E-government business models for public service networks. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 3(3):54–71. doi:10.4018/IJEGR.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., and A. Zuiderwijk. 2014. Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users. Social Science Computer Review 32(5):694–711. doi:10.1177/0894439314525902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. 2013. A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago Open Data Project. Government Information Quarterly 30(4):508–513. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, P., and R. Williams. 2013. Value architectures for digital business: Beyond the business model. MIS Quarterly 37(2):643–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumeich, J., T. Burkhart, D. Werth, and P. Loos 2012. Towards a component-based description of business models: A state-of-the-art analysis. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings, AISeL, Seattle, Washington. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/EBusiness/19 (accessed January 5, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lariviere, B., H. Joosten, E. C. Malthouse, M. Van Birgelen, P. Aksoy, W. H. Kunz, M.-H. Huang, and L. Aksoy. 2013. Value fusion: The blending of consumer and firm value in distinct context of mobile technologies and social media. Journal of Service Management 24(3):268–293. doi:10.1108/09564231311326996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G., and Y. H. Kwak. 2012. An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29(4):492–503. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, D. 2013. Towards open development: Leveraging open data to improve the planning and coordination of international aid. Government Information Quarterly 30(4):426–434. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linne, M. R., and J. Cirincione. 2008. Creating open data standards for real estate, appraisal, and mortgage banking. Journal of Real Estate Literature 16(1):75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., J. R. Gil-Garcia, and G. Romero. 2012. Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspective. Government Information Quarterly 29(3):324–334. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhaes, G., C. Roseira, and L. Manley. 2014. Business models for open government data. In ICEGOV 2014: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 365–370. Guimarães, Portugal: ACM ICPS.
   Google Scholar
• Masip-Bruin, X., G.-J. Ren, R. Serral-Gracia, and M. Yannuzzi 2013. Unlocking the value of open data with a process-based information platform. CBI 2013: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics, 331–337. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Nabukenya, J. 2012. Combining case study, design science and action research methods for effective collaboration engineering research efforts. HICSS-45: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 343–352. Maui, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Nah, F. F. H., K. Siau, and H. Sheng. 2005. The value of mobile applications: A utility company study. Communications of the ACM 48(2):85–90. doi:10.1145/1042091.1042095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. 2012. Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(2):346–368. doi:10.1177/0020852312438783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nenonen, S., and K. Storbacka. 2010. Business model design: Conceptualizing networked value co-creation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 2(1):43–59. doi:10.1108/17566691011026595.
   Google Scholar
• Obama Administration. 2009. Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Transparency and open government. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/ (accessed October 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur 2002. An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. In Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, 139–146, Bled, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2010. Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers, 1/E. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos, P., M. M. Al-Debei, G. Fitzgerald, and T. Elliman. 2012. A business model perspective for ICTs in public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29(2):192–202. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3):45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peinel, G., M. Jarke, and T. Rose. 2010. Business models for eGovernment services. Electronic Government, an International Journal 7(4):380–401. doi:10.1504/EG.2010.035722.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2010. What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine 363(26):2477–2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, N., M. Jaiswal, and U. Gulla. 2009. A conceptual framework for measuring public value of enterprise applications. Electronic Government, an International Journal 6(3):307–326. doi:10.1504/EG.2009.024947.
   Google Scholar
• Rajala, R., M. Westerlund, and K. Moller. 2012. Strategic flexibility in open innovation—Designing business models for open source software. European Journal of Marketing 46(10):1368–1388. doi:10.1108/03090561211248071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: 5/E, New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-Almazan, R., and J. R. Gil-Garcia. 2014. Towards an evaluation model for open government: A preliminary proposal. In EGOV 2014, Dublin, Ireland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8653, ed. M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, and F. Bannister, 47–58. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sayogo, D. S., T. A. Pardo, and M. Cook 2014. A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts. HICSS-47: Proceedings of the 47^th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 1896–1905. Big Island, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Rauch, S., and G. Schwabe. 2014. Designing for mobile value co-creation—The case of travel counselling. Electronic Markets 24(1):5–17. doi:10.1007/s12525-013-0124-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, P., and J. F. Hampe. 2006. Mobile communities: How viable are their business models? An exemplary investigation of the leisure industry. Electronic Commerce Research 6(1):103–121. doi:10.1007/s10660-006-5990-0.
   Google Scholar
• Sein, M. K., O. Henfridsson, S. Purao, M. Rossi, and R. Lindgren. 2011. Action design research. MIS Quarterly 35(1):37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadbolt, N., and K. O’Hara. 2013. Linked data in government. IEEE Internet Computing 17(4):72–77. doi:10.1109/MIC.2013.72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, K. D. 2005. The value of open standards and open-source software in government environments. IBM Systems Journal 44(2):227–238. doi:10.1147/sj.442.0227.
   Google Scholar
• Timmers, P. 1998. Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets 8(2):3–8. doi:10.1080/10196789800000016.
   Google Scholar
• Trimi, S., and H. Sheng. 2008. Emerging trends in m-government. Communications of the ACM 51(5):53–58. doi:10.1145/1342327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trkman, M., and P. Trkman. 2014. Actors’ misaligned interests to explain the low impact of an information system—A case study. International Journal of Information Management 34(2):296–307. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney, U. 2008. Business models for mobile commerce services: Requirements, design, and the future. IT Professional 10(6):48–55. doi:10.1109/MITP.2008.117.
   Google Scholar
• Veljkovic, N., S. Bogdanovic-Dinic, and L. Stoimenov. 2014. Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly 31(2):278–290. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhardt, C., A. Anandasivam, B. Blau, and J. Stosser. 2009. Business models in the service world. IT Professional 11(2):28–33. doi:10.1109/MITP.2009.21.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven, F., M. Ehrenhard, and J. Kuhn. 2015. Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly 32(1):30–42. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T. M., J. Lo, H. J. Wang, and J. Shiang. 2013. Open data development and value-added government information: Case studies of Taiwan e-government. In ICEGOV 2013: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 238–241. Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM ICPS.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. C. 2001. An integrated framework of business models for guiding electronic commerce applications and case studies. In EC-Web 2001, Munich, Germany, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 2115, ed. K. Bauknecht, S. K. Madria, and G. Pernul, 111–120. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. C. 2005. Linking the balanced scorecard to business models for value based strategic management in E-business. In EC-Web 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 3590, ed. K. Bauknecht, B. Proell, and H. Werthner, 158–167. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. C. 2008. Building a value-centric e-government service framework based on a business model perspective. In EGOV 2008, Turin, Italy, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 5184, ed. M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, and E. Ferro, 160–171. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. C. 2013. Value proposition in mobile government. In EGOV 2013, Koblenz, Germany, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 8074, ed. M. A. Wimmer, M. Janssen, and H. J. Scholl, 175–187. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. C. 2014. Developing value-centric business models for mobile government. In EGOV 2014, Dublin, Ireland, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 8653, ed. M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, and F. Bannister, 325–336. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleti, F. A., A. Ojo, and E. Curry. 2014. Emerging business models for the open data industry: characterization and analysis. In dg.o’14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 215–226. Aguascalientes, Mexico: ACM ICPS.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, A., and M. Janssen. 2014. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly 31(1):17–29. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar