Toward an integrative assessment of open government: Proposing conceptual lenses and practical components

References

• Alanazi, J., and A. Chatfield. 2012. Sharing government-owned data with the public: A cross-country analysis of open data practice in the Middle East. 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2012), Seattle, Washington, USA, 1–10. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/EGovernment/16.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. L. 2009. Advancing e-government performance in the United States through enhanced usability benchmarks. Government Information Quarterly 26:82–88. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, F. 2007. The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(2):171–188. doi:10.1177/0020852307077959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, F., and R. Connolly. 2011. The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet 3(1):158–187. doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1076.
   Google Scholar
• Bayne, P. 1984. Freedom of information. Legal Service Bulletin 9:121. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/alterlj9&id=129&div=&collection=journals.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. In Government information quarterly, vol. 27, 264–71. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., and H. Choi. 2013. Big data and e-government: Issues, policies, and recommendations. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2479724.2479730.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., U. Gorham, P. T. Jaeger, L. C. Sarin, and H. Choi. 2014. Big data, open government and e-government: Issues, policies and recommendations. Information Polity 19(1–2):5–16. doi:10.3233/IP-140328.
   Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, P. 1997. Freedom of information. Parliamentary Affairs 50(1):166–181. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a028711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R. P., S. Gupta, and D. Thomas. 2009. A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 26(1):17–48. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 2007. Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal 13(4):447–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M., and M. Hernández Díaz. 2009. Comunicación y Poder. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-S., H.-T. Tsou, and R. K. H. Ching. 2011. Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 40(8):1331–1346. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., and T. C. Hsieh. 2014. Big data for digital government: Opportunities, challenges, and strategies. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age 1(1):1–14. doi:10.4018/ijpada.2014010101.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, S. A., S. Shulman, R. Sandoval, and E. Hovy. 2010. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age City University of New York, College of Staten Island. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico. University of Southern California - Information Science Institute. 15:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., and H. Margetts. 2014. Governments and citizens getting to know each other? Open, closed, and big data in public management reform. Policy & Internet 6(4):393–417. doi:10.1002/1944-2866.POI377.
   Google Scholar
• Conradie, P., and S. Choenni. 2014. On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly 31:S10–17. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, A., and F. Iannacci. 2010. Information systems in the public sector: The e-government enactment framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19(1):52–66. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa, A. S., P. L. P. Corrêa, and F. S. C. da Silva. 2014. Transparency portals versus open government data: An assessment of openness in Brazilian municipalities. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2014). Dg.o ’14. Aguascalientes, Mexico. doi:10.1145/2612733.2612760.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, N. F. D., A. F. Tavares, R. C. Marques, S. Jorge, and L. de Sousa. 2015. Measuring local government transparency. Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., and N. Helbig. 2010. Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6228 LNCS:50–60. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_5.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, B., M. D. S. N. Kellyton, M. A. da Silva Costa, V. C. Garcia, and S. R. de Lemos Meira. 2014. Using parliamentary Brazilian open data to improve transparency and public participation in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2014). Dg.o ’14. Aguascalientes, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Drachsler, D. A. 1976. Freedom of Information Act and the right of non-disclosure. The Administrative Law Review 28(1). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/admin28&id=49&div=&collection=journals.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, W. H. 2009. The fifth estate emerging through the network of networks. Prometheus 27(1). Routledge: 1–15. doi:10.1080/08109020802657453.
   Google Scholar
• Fishenden, J., and M. Thompson. 2013. Digital government, open architecture, and innovation: Why public sector IT will never be the same again. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23:977–1004. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. C N - JK2445.A8 F68. 2001. 352.13/0285. 2001. Building the virtual state : Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century, 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Gant, D. B., J. P. Gant, and C. L. Johnson. 2002. State web portals: Delivering and financing e-service, 60. Arlington, VA: The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for The Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, C. P., and V. L. Jörn. 2012. Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data). JeDEM—eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 4:265–278. http://www.jedem.org/article/view/143.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R. 2012. Towards a smart state? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 17:269–280. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-000287.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R., N. Helbig, and A. Ojo. 2014. Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly 31:I1–I8. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R. 2009. Measuring government performance to promote transparency. Public Manager 38:18–22. http://search.thepublicmanager.org/TPM/isysquery/574025a8-e66e-48d0-b9c0-c5ffad2393ef/1/doc/Vol38N1_MeasuringGovernment_Greene.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D., and K. Spraul. 2010. Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Public Administration Quarterly 34(3):338–377.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawong, P. 2015. Open government and social media: A focus on transparency. Social Science Computer Review 33(5):587–598. doi:10.1177/0894439314560685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A., and D. Greiling. 2013. Transparency, e-government, and accountability: Some issues and considerations. Public Performance & Management Review 36:562–584. doi:10.2753/Pmr1530-9576360404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, K., K. Belkacem, and L. Ekenberg. 2014. Open government and democracy: A research review. Social Science Computer Review 1–16. doi:10.1177/0894439314560847.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M., and D. Boyle. 2009. The Challenge of Co-production. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/challenge-co-production
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T. M., S. Guerrero, G. B. Burke, M. Cook, A. Cresswell, N. Helbig, J. Hrdinova, and T. C. N. Pardo. 2012. Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 17:83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S., and J. R. Gil-Garcia. 2007. Institutional theory and e-government research. In Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology, eds. G. D. Garson, and M. Khosrow-Pour, 349–360. Hershey, PA: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hellberg, A.-S., and K. Hedström. 2015. The story of the sixth myth of open data and open government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 9(1):35–51. doi:10.1108/TG-04-2014-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Hollyer, J. R., B. Peter Rosendorff, and J. R. Vreeland. 2014. Measuring transparency. Political Analysis 22(4):413–434. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iribarren, M., G. Concha, G. Valdes, M. Solar, M. T. Villarroel, P. Gutiérrez, and Á. Vásquez. 2008. Capability maturity framework for egovernment: A multi dimensional model and assessing tool. In Electronic Government, 136–147. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalampokis, E., E. Tambouris, and K. Tarabanis. 2011. Open government data: A stage model. In Electronic government: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2011, eds. M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, and Y.-H. Tan, Delft, The Netherlands: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. http://www.springerlink.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/content/61kmnr511x680518/.
   Google Scholar
• Karamagioli, E., E.-R. Staiou, and D. Gouscos. 2014. Can open-government models contribute to more collaborative ways of governance? In Open Government SE - 3, ed. M. Gascó-Hernández, vol. 4, 37–50. New York: Public Administration and Information Technology, Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Kassen, M. 2013. A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago Open Data Project. Government Information Quarterly 30(4):508–513. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, B. E. 2013. Big data, open government, and sunlight. Information Today 30:1–33. [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Kim, G.-H., S. Trimi, and J.-H. Chung. 2014. Big-data applications in the government sector. Communications of the ACM 57:78–85. doi:10.1145/2500873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabina, B., T. Prorok, and B. Lutz. 2012. Implementation of open government. Vienna, Austria. http://www.kdz.or.at/de/open-government-vorgehensmodell.
   Google Scholar
• Kucera, J., and D. Chlapek. 2014. Benefits and risks of open government data. Journal of Systems Integration 5(1):30–41. http://www.si-journal.org/index.php/JSI/article/view/185.
   Google Scholar
• Lathrop, D., and L. Ruma. 2010. Open government: Collaboration, transparency and participation in practice, 1st ed. California: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., and Y. H. Kwak. 2011. Open government implementation model: A stage model for achieving increased public engagement. 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2011), 254–261. Dg.o ’11. College Park, MD: ACM. doi:10.1145/2037556.2037598.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., and Y. H. Kwak. 2012. An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29(4):492–503. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, D. 2012. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 29:446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, D., and S. C. Wilson. 2011. What is open government?: One year after the directive. 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2011), 262–271. Dg.o ’11. College Park, MD: ACM. doi:10.1145/2037556.2037599.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, C., and D. Naurin. 2010. Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review 31(3):301–322. doi:10.1177/0192512110377602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodi, G., A. Maccioni, and F. Tortorelli. 2012. Linked open data in the Italian e-government interoperability framework. In 6th International Conference on Methodologies, Technologies, and Tools Enabling E-Government (MeTTeG12), 159–70. Belgrade, Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, R. P. 2015. An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly 32(3):323–332. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, R. P., P. M. e Sá, S. Jorge, and A. F. Pattaro. 2013. Online transparency for accountability: One assessing model and two applications. Electronic Journal of E-Government 11(2):279–291.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., J. R. Gil-Garcia, and G. Romero. 2012. Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspective. Government Information Quarterly 29(3):324–34. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, and C. B. Cruz. 2007. Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives. Government Information Quarterly 24:808–826. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, D., and M. Janssen. 2013. Measurement and benchmarking foundations: Providing support to organizations in their development and growth using dashboards. Government Information Quarterly 30:S83–S93. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. 2010. Building open government. Government Information Quarterly 27(4):401–413. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIvor, R., M. McHugh, and C. Cadden. 2002. Internet technologies: Supporting transparency in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management 15(3):170–187. doi:10.1108/09513550210423352.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. 2015. Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review 33(5):599–612. doi:10.1177/0894439314560851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meskell, D. 2009. Transparency and open government. GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications (Spring):1–37. http://www.astrid.eu/Malamminis/Documenti/GSA_Transparency_000.pdf\nhttp://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/gsa/transparency_000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Michener, G., and K. Bersch. 2013. Identifying transparency. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 18:233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. 2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review 62(4):424–433. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. 2012. Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly 29:12–20. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsom, G., and L. Dickey. 2013. Citizenville: How to take the town square digital and reinvent government, 1st ed. London, UK: The Penguin Press HC.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. 2009. Wiki Government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2009. Transparency and open government | The White House. Washington, DC: The Press Office. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/.
   Google Scholar
• OCDE. 2015. Gobierno Abierto En América Latina. In Estudios de la OCDE sobre Gobernanza Pública, Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Open Government Partnership. 2011, September. Open Government Declaration | Open Government Partnership. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/open-government-declaration (accessed January 11, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Open Government Working Group. 2007. Eight principles of open government data—OpenGovData.org. http://www.opengovdata.org/home/8principles (accessed January 11, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Peixoto, T. 2013. The uncertain relationship between open data and accountability: A response to Yu and Robinson’s the new ambiguity of ‘open government.’ UCLA Law Review Discourse 60(2007):200–213.
   Google Scholar
• Picazo-Vela, S., I. Gutiérrez-Martínez, F. Duhamel, D. E. Luna, and L. F. Luna-Reyes. 2015. Interorganizational collaboration and value creation in digital government projects. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2015) Dg.o ’15. Phoenix, AZ, USA ACM. doi:10.1145/2757401.2757403.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., L. Torres, and B. Acerete. 2007. Are ICTs promoting government accountability?: A comparative analysis of e-governance developments in 19 OECD countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 18:583–602. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2006.01.012.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L. M., A. C. Rodríguez, and J. Pimiento. 2012. Implementation framework for open data in Colombia, 14–17. Albany, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Raus, M., J. Liu, and A. Kipp. 2010. Evaluating IT innovations in a business-to-government context: A framework and its applications. Government Information Quarterly 27(2):122–33. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, S. W. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, S. W. 2010. Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management 10(1):5–21. doi:10.1080/14697010903549408.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, E. L. 1973. Freedom of information. Loyola Law Review 20:45. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/loyolr20&id=53&div=&collection=journals.
   Google Scholar
• Rorissa, A., D. Demissie, and T. Pardo. 2011. Benchmarking E-government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-government index and ranking. Government Information Quarterly 28(3):354–362. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. 2012. Co-Production: Option or obligation? Australian Journal of Public Administration 71(3):314–324. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00780.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagiroglu, S., and D. Sinanc. 2013. Big data: A review. International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 42–47. San Diego, CA: IEEE Comput. Soc. doi:10.1109/CTS.2013.6567202.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-Almazan, R. 2009. Midiendo La Transparencia En Internet: Ranking de Las Páginas Web de Los Institutos de Transparencia En Mexico. In Federalismo y Transparencia En México: Seis Estudios de Caso, ed. C. Herrera, G. Lizama, and L. Morales, vol. 1, 1st ed., 219–47. Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico: Alianza Civica-COmunidad Europea.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-Almazan, R. 2010. Ranking de Portales de Transparencia: La medición 2010. Política Digital. www.politicadigital.com.mx (accessed January 12, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-Almazan, R. 2013. La larga marcha del Gobierno Abierto. Teoría, medición y futuro. Publicando. Mexico City, Mexico: INAP. http://www.inap.mx/portal/images/pdf/book/larga_marcha.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-Almazan, R. 2011. The two door perspective: An assessment framework for open government. Journal of E Democracy and Open Government 3(2):166–181. http://www.jedem.org/article/view/67.
   Google Scholar
• Sayogo, D. S., and T. A. Pardo. 2013. Understanding smart data disclosure policy success: The case of green button. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2479724.2479737.
   Google Scholar
• Sayogo, D. S., T. A. Pardo, and M. Cook. 2014. A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-47). Waikoloa Village, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, H. J., and M. C. Scholl. 2014. Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. In Proceedings of the 9th iConference, eds. M. Kindling, and E. Greifeneder. Berlin, Germany: Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (IDEALS). doi:10.9776/14010.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, H. J. 2012. Five trends that matter: Challenges to 21st century electronic government. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 17:317–327. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-0280.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, H. J., and L. F. Luna-Reyes. 2011. Uncovering dynamics of open government, transparency, participation, and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-44). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. 2000. Accountability in the regulatory state. Journal of Law and Society 27(1):38–60. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, K. 2013. The ‘new institutionalism’ in organization theory: Bringing society and culture back in. The American Sociologist 44(1):76–95. doi:10.1007/s12108-012-9170-5.
   Google Scholar
• Shkabatur, J. 2012. Transparency with(out) accountability: Open government in the United States. Yale Law & Policy Review 31:79–140. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=07408048&AN=87725831&h=BxPS+wE+T3Z6og4/pZFKtt4JUh1fztElvi4c/pt8L6TYKoBWllYWvDKKgwTrib1TF1W/uS7D5rEmJgXM/hwB4g==&crl=c.
   Google Scholar
• Solar, M., G. Concha, and L. Meijueiro. 2012. A model to assess open government data in public agencies. In Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2012, eds. H. J. Scholl, M. Janssen, M. Wimmer, C. Moe, and L. Flak, Kristiansand, Norway: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. http://www.springerlink.com/content/xx4759667k518664/abstract/.
   Google Scholar
• Stough, R., and D. McBride. 2014. Big data and U.S. public policy. Review of Policy Research 31(4): 339–42. doi:10.1111/ropr.12083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D., and A. Williams. 2006. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything, 1st ed. New York: Portfolio Hardcover.
   Google Scholar
• Tauberer, J. 2014. Open government data, 2nd ed. Amazon Digital Services Inc. http://www.amazon.com/Open-Government-Data-Second-Edition-ebook/dp/B007U69DKU.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, G., M. Solar, H. Astudillo, M. Iribarren, G. Concha, and M. Visconti. 2011. Conception, development and implementation of an e-government maturity model in public agencies. Government Information Quarterly 28(2):176–187. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veljković, N., S. Bogdanović-Dinić, and L. Stoimenov. 2014. Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly 31:278–290. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Lucke, J., and K. Große. 2014. Open government collaboration. In Open Government SE - 12, ed. M. Gascó-Hernández, vol. 4, 189–204. New York: Public Administration and Information Technology. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_12.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. H., N. A. Stanton, P. M. Salmon, and D. P. Jenkins. 2008. A review of sociotechnical systems theory: A classic concept for new command and control paradigms. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 9(6): 479–99. doi:10.1080/14639220701635470.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, A. L. 2014. Government information policy in the era of big data. Review of Policy Research 31:319–325. doi:10.1111/Ropr.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzner, D. J. 2014. The jurisprudence of accountability. In 2nd International Workshop on Accountability: Science, Technology and Policy. http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2014/AccountableSystems2014/abs/weitzner-account-jurisprudence-abs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzner, D. J., H. Abelson, T. Berners-Lee, J. Feigenbaum, J. Hendler, and G. J. Sussman. 2008. Information accountability. Communications of the ACM 51(6):82–87. doi:10.1145/1349026.1349043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., and W. Wong. 2001. Global information technology pressure and government accountability: The mediating effect of domestic context on website openness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11:509–538. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. C., and D. Linders. 2011. The open government directive: A preliminary assessment. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference on iConference 11, 387–94. Washington, DC: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1940761.1940814.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., and S. Birkmeyer. 2015, April. Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration 38:381–396. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.942735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, W., and E. Welch. 2004. Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability. Governance 17:275–297. doi:10.1111/gove.2004.17.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-M., J. Lo, and J. Shiang. 2015. To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data. Journal of Information Science 1:1–17. doi:10.1177/0165551515586715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, A., and M. Janssen. 2014. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly 31:17–29. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, A., M. Janssen, and C. Davis. 2014. Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems. Information Polity 19(1–2):17–33. doi:10.3233/IP-140329.
   Google Scholar