Negotiation protocol based on ordered weighted averaging and Fuzzy metrics

References

• Ahn, B. S. 2006. On the properties of OWA operator weights functions with constant level of orness. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on Issue 4:511–15.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Alawi, B. M., and A. D. Coker. 2018. Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection. Energy 157:278–96. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo, C., and L. Godo. 2007. Artificial Intelligence Research and Development, Vol. 163, 450. IOS press.
   Google Scholar
• Aulkemeier, F., M.-E. Iacob, and J. Van Hillegersberg. 2017. An architectural perspective on service adoption: A platform design and the case of pluggable cross-border trade compliance in e-commerce. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 27:325–41. doi:10.1080/10919392.2017.1363588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourcier, D. 2003 Legal knowledge and information systems. The sixteenth annual conference University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Campanella, G., and R. A. Ribeiro. 2011 December. A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decision Support Systems 52(1):52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrashekhar, H., and B. Bhasker. 2011 December. Quickly locating efficient, equitable deals in automated negotiations under two-sided information uncertainty. Decision Support Systems 52(1):157–68. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez, A., D. Dreilinger, R. Guttman, and P. Maes 1997. A real-life experiment in creating an agent marketplace. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM’97), London.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Z., and L. Xing; (2009): A negotiation model of supply chain based on multi-agent. Second International Conference on Information and Computing Science, vol. 1, 228–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chinchuluun, A., P. Pardalos, A. Migdalas, and L. Pitsoulis. 2008. Pareto optimality, game theory and equilibria. Springer optimization and its application, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, A. K., R. Shankar, and M. K. Tiwari. 2006 December. Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1776–99. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de almeida, A. M., D.C., Costa, A. P. C. S., Alencar, L. H., Daher, S. F. D. (2012). Decisão em grupo e negociação: Método e aplicações. Ed. Atlas.
   Google Scholar
• de Paula, G., F. Ramos, and G. Ramalho. (2001). Bilateral Negotiation Model for Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. AMEC 2000: Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce III, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• de Paula, G. E., F. Ramos, and G. L. Ramalho, (2000): Bilateral negotiation model for agent mediated electronic commerce. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce (AMEC III) in International Conference in Autonomous Agents (Agents 2000), 1–16. Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, C., A. Castiglionea, F. Palmieria, and Ficcob. 2018. M: Building a network embedded FEC protocol by using game theory. Information Sciences 433–434: 365–380.
   Google Scholar
• Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision function for autonomous agents. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24:sv:159–182. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(98)00029-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten, G, and H. Lai. 2007. Satisfiability and completeness of protocols for electronic negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research 180 (2):922–37. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.056.
   Google Scholar
• Goeltner, C. 1987. The computer as a third party: Decision support system for two party single issue and two parties multi-issue negotiations. MIT, Cambridge, MA: Sloan School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Hering, J., L. Nunnenmacher, and H. Von Waldow. 2018. Perspectives from a water research institute on knowledge management for sustainable water management. In Handbook of knowledge management for sustainable water systems, ed. Meir Russ, 15.30. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, G., and G. Lo. 2003. Aspire: An integrated negotiation support system and software agents for e-business negotiation. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management 1 (3):293. doi:10.1504/IJIEM.2003.003822.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgour, M., and C. E Eden. 2010. Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer science business media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. 2011. Distributed coordination of project schedule changes: An agent-based compensatory negotiation approach. Standford: CIFE, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Leao, J., and D. Morais (2011): A bilateral negotiation model for supply chain systems. Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011 IEEE International Conference, Anchorage.
   Google Scholar
• Leãp, J., and D. C. Morais. 2012. Using Faratin model to aid decision in a non-electronic negotiation. In GDN - group decision and negotiation. Recife: GDN.
   Google Scholar
• Madani, K., O. M. Rouhani, A. Mirchi, and S. Gholizadeh. 2014. A negotiation support system for resolving an international trans-boundary natural resource conflict. Environmental Modelling & Software 51:240–49. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, T. 2006. Maximal orness weights with a fixed variability for OWA operators. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 14 (3):271–76. doi:10.1142/S021848850600400X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, A. 1993. The decision to attack Iraq: A noncompensatory theory of decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37:595–618. doi:10.1177/0022002793037004001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, A., N. Geva, and K. Derouen Jr. 1994. Mathematical models of foreign policy decision-making: Compensatory vs. noncompensatory. Synthese 100:441–60. doi:10.1007/BF01063911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, M. 2006. Building a decision support system with a knowledge modeling tool. Journal of Decision Systems 14 (3):303–320. Lavoisier.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, A., J. Rothe, and A. Marple. 2017. Path-disruption games. Bribery and a Probabilistic Model Theory of Computing Systems 60 (2):222–52. doi:10.1007/s00224-016-9669-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoop, M., A. Jertila, and T. List. 2003. Negoisst: A negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce. Data and Knowledge Engineering 47:371–401. doi:10.1016/S0169-023X(03)00065-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, F., T. Pinto, I. Praça, and Z. Vale, (2017) Decision support system for the negotiation of bilateral contracts in electricity markets, In Trends in Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection - 15th International Conference, eds. F. De la Prieta, Z. Vale, L. Antunes, T. Pinto, A. T. Campbell, V. Julian, A. Neves, and M. N. Moreno. PAAMS, PAAMS.
   Google Scholar
• Taghezout, N., I. Bessedik, and A. Adla. 2011. A multi-agent architecture for a web-based DSS application to resource allocation problems in a flow-shop manufacturing system. Journal of Decision Systems 20 (4):443–66.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. A., T. M. Burns, and J. Mesmer-Magnus. 2008. Teaching the art of negotiation: Improving students’ negotiating confidence and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business 83 (3):135–40. doi:10.3200/JOEB.83.3.135-140.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. K., and G. E. Kersten. 2017. Procurement auctions and negotiations: An empirical comparison. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 27 (4):281–303. doi:10.1080/10919392.2017.1363576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagger, R. 1998. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man ad Cybernetics 18: 183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, B., Ding, L., Zhang, Z. (2007): An agent-based integrated negotiation framework of material procurement for lean construction material delivery. IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, ICAL.
   Google Scholar