278
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

USERS’ SOCIOCULTURAL ORIENTATION AND SMART SYSTEMS ACCEPTANCE LINK: DO DEMOGRAPHICS MATTER?

, , , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adams, D. A., R. R. Nelson, and P. A. Todd. 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly 16 (2):227–47. doi:10.2307/249577.
  • Ajjan, A., and R. Hartshorne. 2008. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory adoption of enterprise resource planning. Computers in Industry 59 (6):548–64.
  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Al-Gahtani, S., and M. King. 1999. Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 18 (4):277–97. doi:10.1080/014492999119020.
  • Al-Jumeily, D., and A. Hussain. 2014. The impact of cultural factors on technology acceptance: A technology acceptance model across Eastern and Western cultures. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development 2 (4):37–62.
  • Al-Khouri, A. M. 2012a. Emerging markets and digital economy: Building trust in the virtual world. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy 3 (2):57–69. doi:10.4018/IJIDE.
  • Al-Khouri, A. M. 2012b. PKI in government digital identity management systems. The European Journal of ePractice 14:4–21.
  • Al-Suqri, M., and A. Al-Aufi. 2015. Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.
  • Andriole, S., T. Cox, and K. Khin. 2018. The innovator‘s imperative: Rapid technology adoption for digital transformation. New York: CRC Press.
  • Bandiera, O., and I. Rasul. 2006. Social networks and technology adoption in northern Mozambique. The Economic Journal 116 (514):869–902. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01115.x.
  • Baudier, P., C. Ammi, and M. Deboeuf-Rouchon. 2018. Smart home: Highly-educated students‘ acceptance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.043.
  • Bhatnagar, A., and S. Ghose. 2004. A latent class segmentation analysis of e-shoppers. Journal of Business Research 57 (7):758–67. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00357-0.
  • Brown, S., and V. Venkatesh. 2005. Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly 29 (3):399–426. doi:10.2307/25148690.
  • Caragliua, A., and C. Bo. 2018. Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 142: 373–83.
  • Chatti, M. A., M. Jarke, and D. Frosch-Wilke. 2007. The future of e-learning: A shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3 (4/5):404–20. doi:10.1504/IJKL.2007.016702.
  • Cheung, R., and D. Vogel. 2013. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education 63:160–75. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003.
  • Cho, H. 2011. Theoretical intersections among social influences, beliefs, and intentions in the context of 3G mobile services in Singapore: Decomposing perceived critical mass and subjective norms. Journal of Communication 61 (2):283–306. doi:10.1111/jcom.2011.61.issue-2.
  • Conner, M., and C. J. Armitage. 1998. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 (15):1429–64. doi:10.1111/jasp.1998.28.issue-15.
  • Daim, T., N. Behkami, N. Basoglu, O. Kok, and L. Hohaboam. 2016. Healthcare technology innovation adoption electronic health records and other emerging health information technology innovations. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3):319–40. doi:10.2307/249008.
  • Davis, F., R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8):982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  • Eom, S., N. Choi, and W. Sung. 2016. The use of smart work in government: Empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Government Information Quarterly 33 (3):562–71. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005.
  • European Commission (2014). Smart system integration community. Digital agenda for Europe. April 14, 2014 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/communities/smart-system-integration-community.
  • Fanning, K., and D. P. Centers. 2013. Intelligent business process management: Hype or reality? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 24 (5):9–14. doi:10.1002/jcaf.21870.
  • Frambach, R., and N. Schillewaert. 2002. Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research 55 (2):163–76. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1.
  • Hair, J., W. Black, B. Babin, R. Anderson, and R. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. Upper saddle river, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Prentice Hall.
  • Harbor Research (2013). Emergence of smart systems: Analysing market opportunities. Retrieved from: http://harborresearch.com/wp-content/onHarbor-Research_IoT-Market-Opps-Paper_2013.pdf August 2013
  • Hofstede, G. 1997. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw- Hill.
  • Holsapple, C., and M. Singh. 2000. Toward a unified view of electronic commerce, electronic business, and collaborative commerce: A knowledge management approach. Knowledge and Process Management 7 (3):151–64. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1441.
  • Hsu, C., and J. Lin. 2016. An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 62 (3):516–27. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.023.
  • Huntsville, A. (2013, March 13). New Zealand Police equips 6,000 frontline officers with intergraph mobile technology. Retrieved from: http://www.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/news-releases/new-zealand-police-equips-6000-frontline-officers-with-intergraph-mobile-technolog October 2016
  • Igbaria, M., N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg, and A. Cavaye. 1997. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21 (3):279–305. doi:10.2307/249498.
  • Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, and G. Davis. 1995. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (4):87–114. doi:10.1080/07421222.1995.11518061.
  • Kautonen, T., E. T. Tornikoski, and E. Kibler. 2011. Entrepreneurial intentions in the third age: The impact of perceived age norms. Small Business Economics 37 (2):219–34. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9238-y.
  • Khan, R. H., and J. Y. Khan. 2013. A comprehensive review of the application characteristics and traffic requirements of a smart grid communications network. Computer Networks 57 (3):825–45. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.11.002.
  • Khosrow-Pour, M. 2017. Handbook of research on technology adoption, social policy, and global integration. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
  • Kim, S., and G. Garrison. 2009. Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology model. Information Systems Frontier 11 (3):323–33. doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9073-8.
  • Konana, P., and S. Balasubramanian. 2005. The social-economic-psychological (SEP) model of technology adoption and usage: An application to online investing. Decision Support Systems 39 (3):505–24. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2003.12.003.
  • Kwok, S., and S. Gao. 2006. Attitude towards knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer Information Systems 46 (2):45–51.
  • Lai, H. M., and C. P. Chen. 2011. Factors influencing secondary school teachers’ adoption of teaching blogs. Computers & Education 56 (4):948–60. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.010.
  • Lam, T., V. Cho, and H. Qu. 2007. A study of hotel employee behavioral intentions towards adoption of information technology. International Journal of Hospitality Management 26 (1):49–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.09.002.
  • Lerouge, C., S. Newton, and J. Blanton. 2005. Exploring the systems analyst skill set: Perceptions, preferences, age, and gender. Journal of Computer Information Systems 45 (3):12–23.
  • Lewis, W., R. Agarwal, and V. Sambamurthy. 2003. Sources of influence of beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly 27 (4):657–78. doi:10.2307/30036552.
  • Li, K. F. 2013. Smart home technology for telemedicine and emergency management. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 4 (5):535–46. doi:10.1007/s12652-012-0129-8.
  • Liao, Z., and J. R. Landry 2000. An empirical study on organizational acceptance of new information systems in a commercial bank environment. System Sciences Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference January 4-7, 2000 1–7.
  • Lin, H. F. 2011. An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. International Journal of Information Management 31 (3):252–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.006.
  • Lu, J., C. Yu, and C. Liu. 2005. Facilitating conditions, wireless trust and adoption intention. Journal of Computer Information Systems 46 (1):17–24.
  • Noppers, E., K. Keizer, M. Milovanovic, and L. Steg. 2016. The importance of instrumental, symbolic, and environmental attributes for the adoption of smart energy systems. Energy Policy 98:12–18. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.007.
  • O‘Neill, S. A., S. I. McClean, M. D. Donnelly, C. D. Nugent, L. Galway, I. Cleland, and D. Craig. 2014. Development of a technology adoption and usage prediction tool for assistive technology for people with dementia. Interacting with Computers 26 (2):169–76. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwt041.
  • Oliveira, T., M. Thomas, G. Baptista, and F. Campos. 2016. Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior 61:404–14. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030.
  • Ooi, K. B., J. J. Sim, K. T. Yew, and B. Lin. 2011. Exploring factors influencing consumers’ behavioral intention to adopt broadband in Malaysia. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (3):1168–78. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.011.
  • Park, K., C. Kwak, J. Lee, and J. Ahn. 2018. The effect of platform characteristics on the adoption of smart speakers: Empirical evidence in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics 35:2118–32. in press. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.013.
  • Park, W. J., S. Woo, and S. Lee. 2014. Identification of applications of mobile devices to improve airport BHS maintenance. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 18 (5):1207–12. doi:10.1007/s12205-014-0080-7.
  • Peansupap, V., and D. Walker. 2005. Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organizations: A micro analysis. Construction Innovation 5 (3):135–57. doi:10.1108/14714170510815221.
  • Pentikousis, K., R. Agüero, and A. Timm-Gie. 2014. Advances on smart object management. Mobile Networks and Applications 19 (1):1–3. doi:10.1007/s11036-014-0493-z.
  • Peslak, A., W. Ceccucci, and P. Sendall. 2012. An empirical study of social networking behavior using theory of reasoned action. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research 5 (3):12–23.
  • Porter, C., and N. Donthu. 2006. Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research 59 (9):999–1007. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003.
  • Putzer, J. G., and Y. Park. 2010. The effects of innovation factors on smart phone adoption among nurses in community hospitals. Research Perspectives in Health Informatics 7(1b):12.
  • Quazi, A., and M. Talukder. 2011. Demographic determinants of employees’ perception and adoption of technological innovation. Journal of Computer Information Systems 51 (3):38–46.
  • Reeder, B., E. Meyer, A. Lazar, S. Chaudhuri, H. J. Thompson, and G. Demiris. 2013. Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 82 (7):565–79. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.007.
  • Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.
  • Sanguinetti, A., B. Karlin, and R. Ford. 2018. Understanding the path to smart home adoption: Segmenting and describing consumers across the innovation-decision process. Energy Research & Social Science 46:274–83. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.002.
  • Santos, J., Y. Doz, and P. Williamson. 2013. Is your innovation process global MIT? Sloan Management Review 45 (4):31–37.
  • Shen, G. 2015. Users’ adoption of mobile applications: Product type and message framing’s moderating effect. Journal of Business Research 68 (11):2317–21. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.018.
  • Sherif, K., R. Zmud, and G. Browne. 2006. Managing peer-to-peer conflicts in disruptive information technology innovations: The case of software reuse. MIS Quarterly 30 (2):339–56. doi:10.2307/25148734.
  • Shin, D. H., Y. Hwang, and H. Choo. 2013. Smart TV: Are they really smart in interacting with people? Understanding the interactivity of Korean Smart TV. Behaviour & Information Technology 32 (2):156–72. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.603360.
  • Shin, J., Y. Park, and D. Lee. 2018. Who will be smart home users? An analysis of adoption and diffusion of smart homes. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 134: 246–53.
  • Singh, S. 2016. Technology adoption and the new dimensions of mobile banking. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
  • Spaargaren, G. 2011. Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world order. Global Environmental Change 21 (3):813–22. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010.
  • Stephen, J. 2011. Organizational culture and information systems adoption: A three-perspective approach. Information and Organization 21 (2):57–83. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.003.
  • Taherdoost, H., S. Sahibuddin, M. Namayandeh, N. Jalaliyoon, A. Kalantari, and S. S. Chaeikar. 2012. Smart card adoption model: Social and ethical perspectives. International Journal of Research & Reviews in Computer Science 3 (4):1792–96.
  • Talukder, M. 2011. Development of an enhanced model of innovation adoption by individual employees. Journal of Asia Pacific Business 12 (4):316–39. doi:10.1080/10599231.2011.591691.
  • Talukder, M. 2014. Managing innovation adoption: From innovation to implementation. USA: Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  • Talukder, M., and A. Quazi. 2011. The impact of social influence on individuals’ adoption of innovation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 21 (2):111–35. doi:10.1080/10919392.2011.564483.
  • Talukder, M., and A. Quazi. 2017. Developing a research framework for virtual community systems. International Journal of Web Based Communities 13 (2):213–35. doi:10.1504/IJWBC.2017.084415.
  • Talukder, M., A. Quazi, and B. Keating. 2014. Virtual systems in Australia: A study of individual users’ commitments’ and usage. Journal of Internet Commerce 13 (1):1–21. doi:10.1080/15332861.2014.910730.
  • Taylor, S., and P. Todd. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information System Research 6 (2):144–76. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
  • van Everdingen, Y., and B. Wierenga. 2002. Intra-firm adoption decisions: Role of inter-firm and intra-firm variables. European Management Journal 20 (6):649–63. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00116-0.
  • Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, and P. Ackerman. 2000. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83 (1):33–60. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2896.
  • Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540.
  • Venkatesh, V., and S. Brown. 2001. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly 25 (1):71–102. doi:10.2307/3250959.
  • Venkatesh, V., T. A. Sykes, and X. Zhang (2011). ‘Just what the doctor ordered’: A revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), USA, 1–10. IEEE.
  • Vu, K. M. 2011. ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996–2005 period. Telecommunications Policy 35 (4):357–72. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.02.008.
  • Wang, K., G. Chen, and H. Chen. 2018. Understanding technology adoption behavior by older adults. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal 46 (5):801–14. doi:10.2224/sbp.6483.
  • Wang, Y., H. Li, C. Li, and D. Zhang. 2016. Factors affecting hotels’ adoption of mobile reservation systems: A technology-organization-environment framework. Tourism Management 53:163–72. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.021.
  • Westphal, J., R. Gulati, and S. Shortell. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of tqm adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (2):366–94. doi:10.2307/2393924.
  • Woodside, A., and W. Bieman. 2005. Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion and adoption/rejection processes. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 20 (7):380–93. doi:10.1108/08858620510628614.
  • Worden, K., W. A. Bullough, and J. Haywood. 2003. Smart Technologies. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
  • Yi, M., J. Jackson, J. Park, and J. Probst. 2006. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management 43 (3):350–63. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006.
  • Yousafzai, S. Y., G. R. Foxall, and J. G. Pallister. 2010. Explaining internet banking behavior: Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, or technology acceptance model? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40 (5):1172–202. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1559-1816.
  • Yu, C. S. 2012. Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 13 (2):104–21.
  • Yu, E., A. Hong, and J. Hwang. 2016. A socio-technical analysis of factors affecting the adoption of smart TV in Korea. Computers in Human Behavior 61:89–102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.099.
  • Zhang, J. 2009. Exploring drivers in the adoption of mobile commerce in China. The Journal of the American Academy of Business 15 (1):64–69.
  • Zhou, T., Y. B. Lu, and B. Wang. 2010. Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior 26 (4):760–67. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013.
  • Zorn, T. E., A. J. Flanagin, and M. D. Shoham. 2011. Institutional and noninstitutional influences on information and communication technology adoption and use among nonprofit organizations. Human Communication Research 37 (1):1–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01387.x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.