302
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Connecting the Role of the Information Technology Function to its Contribution to the Organization

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Agarwal, R., and V. Sambamurthy. 2002. Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quarterly Executive 1 (1):1–16.
  • Armstrong, J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3):396–402. doi:10.1177/002224377701400320.
  • Augier, M., and D. J. Teece. 2009. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Science 20 (2):410–21. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0424.
  • Auh, S., and B. Menguc. 2005. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research 58 (12):1652–61. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007.
  • Banker, R. D., N. Hu, P. A. Pavlou, and J. Luftman. 2011. CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quarterly 35 (2):487–504. doi:10.2307/23044053.
  • Banker, R. D., and H. H. Johnston. 1995. An empirical study of the business value of the U.S. airlines’ computerized reservations systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 5 (3):255–75. doi:10.1080/10919399509540253.
  • Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1):99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.
  • Benner, M. J., and M. L. Tushman. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28 (2):238–56. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.9416096.
  • Bharadwaj, A., O. A. El Sawy, P. A. Pavlou, and N. Venkatraman. 2013. Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly 37 (2):471–82. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
  • Bhatt, G., A. Emdad, N. Roberts, and V. Grover. 2010. Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage. Information & Management 47 (7–8):341–49. doi:10.1016/j.im.2010.08.001.
  • Bhatt, G. D., and V. Grover. 2005. Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (2):253–77. doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045844.
  • Birkinshaw, J., and K. Gupta. 2013. Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (4):287–98. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0167.
  • Brown, C. V., E. R. McLean, and D. W. Straub. 1996. Partnering roles of the IS executive. Information Systems Management 13 (2):14–18. doi:10.1080/10580539608906982.
  • Burgers, J. H., J. J. P. Jansen, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2009. Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing 24:206–20. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.006.
  • Burns, T., and G. M. Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
  • Carte, T. A., and C. J. Russell. 2003. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly 27 (3):479–501. doi:10.2307/30036541.
  • Chakravarty, A., R. Grewal, and V. Sambamurthy. 2013. Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research 24 (4):976–97. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0500.
  • Chen, D. Q., M. Mocker, D. S. Preston, and A. Teubner. 2010. Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly 34 (2):233–59. doi:10.2307/20721426.
  • Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 9 (2):233–55. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
  • Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1):128–52. doi:10.2307/2393553.
  • Coltman, T., P. P. Tallon, R. Sharma, and M. Queiroz. 2015. Strategic IT alignment: Twenty-five years on. Journal of Information Technology 30:91–100. doi:10.1057/jit.2014.35.
  • Cottrell, T., and B. R. Nault. 2004. Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management Journal 25:1005–25. doi:10.1002/()1097-0266.
  • Danneels, E. 2016. Survey measures of first- and second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal 37 (10):2174–88. doi:10.1002/smj.2428.
  • Drolet, A. L., and D. G. Morrison. 2001. Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? Journal of Service Research 3 (3):196–204. doi:10.1177/109467050133001.
  • Duncan, R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In The management of organization, ed. R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, and D. Slevin, Vol. 1, 167–88. New York: North-Holland.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., and B. N. Tabrizi. 1995. Accelerating adapative processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:84–110. doi:10.2307/2393701.
  • Gerow, J. E., V. Grover, J. Thatcher, and P. L. Roth. 2014. Looking toward the future of IT-business strategic alignment through the past: A meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly 38 (4):1159–85. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.10.
  • Gerow, J. E., J. B. Thatcher, and V. Grover. 2015. Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: An investigation of the constructs and their measurement. European Journal of Information Systems 24 (5):465–91. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.6.
  • Gibson, C. B., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47 (2):209–26.
  • Guillemette, M. G., and G. Pare. 2012. Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Quarterly 36 (2):529–51. doi:10.2307/41703466.
  • Gupta, A. K., K. G. Smith, and C. E. Shalley. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal 49 (4):693–706. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083026.
  • Haffke, I., B. Kalgovas, and A. Benlian. 2017. Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Quarterly Executive 16 (2):101–20.
  • He, Z.-L., and P.-K. Wong. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15 (4):481–94. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078.
  • Helfat, C. E., and M. A. Peteraf. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24 (10):997–1010. doi:10.1002/()1097-0266.
  • Hill, S. A., and J. Birkinshaw. 2014. Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management 40 (7):1899–931. doi:10.1177/0149206312445925.
  • Jansen, J. J. P., M. P. Tempelaar, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2009. Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science 20 (4):797–811. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0415.
  • Kappelman, L., R. Torres, E. R. McLean, C. Maurer, V. Johnson, and K. Kim. 2019. The 2018 SIM IT issues and trends study. MIS Quarterly Executive 18 (1):51–84. doi:10.17705/2msqe.
  • Karimi, J., T. M. Somers, and A. Bhattacherjee. 2007. The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (2):221–60. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240209.
  • Kettinger, W. J., C. Zhang, and K.-C. Chang. 2013. A view from the top: Integrated information delivery and effective information use from the senior executive’s perspective. Information Systems Research 24 (3):842–60. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0473.
  • Kohli, R., and V. Grover. 2008. Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (1):23–29. doi:10.17705/1jais.
  • Kopanaki, E., P. Karvela, and N. Georgopoulos. 2018. From traditional interorganisational systems to cloud-based solutions: The impact on supply chain flexibility. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 28 (4):334–53. doi:10.1080/10919392.2018.1517480.
  • Lacity, M. C., S. A. Khan, and L. P. Willcocks. 2009. A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18 (3):130–46. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2009.06.002.
  • Lapointe, L., and S. Rivard. 2005. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 29 (3):461–91. doi:10.2307/25148692.
  • Laureiro-Martinez, D., S. Brusoni, and M. Zollo. 2010. The neuroscientific foundations of the exploration-exploitation dilemma. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 3 (2):95–115. doi:10.1037/a0018495.
  • Lavie, D., U. Stettner, and M. L. Tushman. 2010. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1):109–55. doi:10.5465/19416521003691287.
  • Lawrence, P. R., and J. W. Lorsch. 1967. Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Leidner, D. E., J. Lo, and D. Preston. 2011. An empirical investigation of the relationship of IS strategy with firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20 (4):419–37. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2011.09.001.
  • Lindell, M. K., and D. J. Whitney. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1):114–21. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114.
  • MacKenzie, S. B., P. M. Podsakoff, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2011. Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly 35 (2):293–334. doi:10.2307/23044045.
  • Malhotra, A., S. Gosain, and O. A. El Sawy. 2005. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly 29 (1):145–87. doi:10.2307/25148671.
  • March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1):71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
  • Martins, R., T. Oliveira, and M. A. Thomas. 2015. Assessing organizational adoption of information systems outsourcing. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 25 (4):360–78. doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.1087702.
  • Mata, F. J., W. L. Fuerst, and J. B. Barney. 1995. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 19 (4):487–505. doi:10.2307/249630.
  • Mithas, S., and R. T. Rust. 2016. How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly 40 (1):223–45. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
  • Mom, T. J. M., F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2009. Understanding variation in managers’ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science 20 (4):812–28. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0427.
  • Morgan, G. 2006. Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Nandy, M., and P. Seetharaman. 2019. Interorganizational processes in buyer–supplier dyads: An information intensity perspective. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 29 (2):96–114. doi:10.1080/10919392.2018.1554280.
  • Newkirk, H. E., and A. L. Lederer. 2006. The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty. Information & Management 43 (4):481–501. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.12.001.
  • O’Reilly, C. A., and M. L. Tushman. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28:185–206. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002.
  • O’Reilly, C. A., and M. L. Tushman. 2013. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (4):324–38. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025.
  • Overby, E., A. Bharadwaj, and V. Sambamurthy. 2006. Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (2):120–31. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600.
  • Pavlou, P. A., and O. A. El Sawy. 2006. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research 17 (3):198–227. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0094.
  • Pawlowski, S. D., and D. Robey. 2004. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly 28 (4):645–72. doi:10.2307/25148658.
  • Peppard, J. 2018. Rethinking the concept of the IS organization. Information Systems Journal 28 (1):76–103. doi:10.1111/isj.12122.
  • Peppard, J., and J. Ward. 1999. Mind the gap: Diagnosing the relationship between the IT organization and the rest of the business. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8 (1):29–60. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(99)00013-X.
  • Piccoli, G., and B. Ives. 2005. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly 29 (4):747–76. doi:10.2307/25148708.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Rai, A., P. Brown, and X. Tang. 2009. Organizational assimilation of electronic procurement innovations. Journal of Management Information Systems 26 (1):257–96. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260110.
  • Rai, A., R. Patnayakuni, and N. Seth. 2006. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly 30 (2):225–46. doi:10.2307/25148729.
  • Raisch, S., and J. Birkinshaw. 2008. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 34 (3):375–409. doi:10.1177/0149206308316058.
  • Ravichandran, T., and C. Lertwongsatien. 2005. Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (4):237–76. doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820.
  • Roberts, N., P. S. Galluch, M. Dinger, and V. Grover. 2012. Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. MIS Quarterly 36 (2):625–48. doi:10.2307/41703470.
  • Roberts, N., and V. Grover. 2012. Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems 28 (4):231–70. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280409.
  • Ross, J. W. 2003. Creating a strategic IT architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIS Quarterly Executive 2 (1):31–43.
  • Sambamurthy, V., A. Bharadwaj, and V. Grover. 2003. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly 27 (2):237–63. doi:10.2307/30036530.
  • Schwarz, A., and R. Hirschheim. 2003. An extended platform logic perspective of IT governance: Managing perceptions and activities of IT. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 12:129–66. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(03)00021-0.
  • Schwarz, A., T. Rizzuto, C. Carraher-Wolverton, J. L. Roldan, and R. Barrera-Barrera. 2017. Examining the impact and detection of the ‘urban legend’ of common method bias. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 48 (1):93–119. doi:10.1145/3051473.3051479.
  • Smith, S. 1914. Right and left handedness. Psychological Bulletin 11 (11):400–02. doi:10.1037/h0075050.
  • Subramani, M. 2004. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly 28 (1):45–74. doi:10.2307/25148624.
  • Tallon, P. P. 2007. Does IT pay to focus? An analysis of IT business value under single and multi-focused business strategies. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16 (3):278–300. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.04.001.
  • Tallon, P. P. 2008a. Inside the adapative enterprise: An information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information Technology and Management 9 (1):21–36. doi:10.1007/s10799-007-0024-8.
  • Tallon, P. P. 2008b. A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3):227–68. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240308.
  • Tallon, P. P. 2014. Do you see what I see? The search for consensus among executives’ perceptions of IT business value. European Journal of Information Systems 23 (3):306–26. doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.2.
  • Tallon, P. P., K. L. Kraemer, and V. Gurbaxani. 2000. Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (4):145–73. doi:10.1080/07421222.2000.11518269.
  • Tallon, P. P., and A. Pinsonneault. 2011. Competing perspectives on the link between strategic IT alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly 35 (2):463–86. doi:10.2307/23044052.
  • Tempelaar, M. P., and N. A. Rosenkranz. 2019. Switching hats: The effect of role transition on individual ambidexterity. Journal of Management 45 (4):1517–39. doi:10.1177/0149206317714312.
  • Teo, T. S. H., and W. R. King. 1999. An empirical study of the impacts of integrating business planning and information systems planning. European Journal of Information Systems 8 (3):200–10. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000334.
  • Tushman, M. L., and C. A. O’Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38 (4):8–30. doi:10.2307/41165852.
  • Uotila, J., M. Maula, T. Keil, and S. A. Zahra. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal 30:221–31. doi:10.1002/smj.738.
  • Vaast, E., and N. Levina. 2006. Multiple faces of codification: Organizational redesign in an IT organization. Organization Science 17 (2):190–201. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0171.
  • Van de Ven, A. H., M. Ganco, and C. R. Hinings. 2013. Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Academy of Management Annals 7 (1):393–440. doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.774981.
  • Vithayathil, J. 2018. Will cloud computing make the information technology (IT) department obsolete? Information Systems Journal 28 (4):634–49. doi:10.1111/isj.12151.
  • Volberda, H. W., and G. H. Van Bruggen. 1997. Environmental turbulence: A look into its dimensionality. In Dynamiek in Bedrijfsvoering, ed. M. T. A. Bemelmans. Enschede, 137-145. The Netherlands: NOBO.
  • Wagner, H.-T., D. Beimborn, and T. Weitzel. 2014. How social capital among information technology and business units drives operational alignment and IT business value. Journal of Management Information Systems 31 (1):241–72. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222310110.
  • Wang, H., and J. Li. 2008. Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of organizational dynamism. Journal of Management 34:925–51. doi:10.1177/0149206308321547.
  • Wanous, J. P., A. E. Reichers, and M. J. Hudy. 1997. Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (2):247–52. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.
  • Willcocks, L. P., and D. Feeny. 2006. IT outsourcing and core IS capabilities: Challenges and lessons at Dupont. Information Systems Management 23 (1):49–56. doi:10.1201/1078.10580530/45769.23.1.20061201/91772.6.
  • Xue, Y., H. Liang, and W. R. Boulton. 2008. Information technology governance in information technology investment decision processes: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context. MIS Quarterly 32 (1):67–96. doi:10.2307/25148829.
  • Yeow, A., C. Soh, and R. Hansen. 2018. Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 27:43–58. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.09.001.
  • Zajac, E. J., M. S. Kraatz, and R. K. F. Bresser. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 21 (4):429–53.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.