Efficient Nested Simulation for Conditional Tail Expectation of Variable Annuities

REFERENCES

• Artzner, P., F. Delbaen, J. M. Eber, and D. Heath. 1999. Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3): 203–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D., A. Reuss, and D. Singer. 2012. On the calculation of the solvency capital requirement based on nested simulations. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA 42(2): 453–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, N. P. 1998. Valuing options in regime-switching models. The Journal of Derivatives 6(1): 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bollerslev, T. 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31(3): 307–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadie, M., Y. Du, and C. C. Moallemi. 2011. Efficient risk estimation via nested sequential simulation. Management Science 57(6): 1172–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadie, M., Y. Du, and C. C. Moallemi. 2015. Risk estimation via regression. Operations Research 63(5): 1077–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadie, M., and P. Glasserman. 1996. Estimating security price derivatives using simulation. Management Science 42(2): 269–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathcart, M., and S. Morrison. 2009. Variable annuity economic capital: The least-squares Monte Carlo approach. Life & Pensions, pp. 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Actuaries. 2017. Standards of Practice, Part 2000— Insurance. Technical report, Canadian Institute of Actuaries. Available at http://www.cia-ica.ca/docs/default-source/standards/si020317e.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, J. C. 1995. The GARCH option pricing model. Mathematical Finance 5(1): 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, R 2014. A comparative study of risk measures for guaranteed minimum maturity benefits by a PDE method. North American Actuarial Journal 18(4): 445–61.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, R., Z. Cui, and P. Li. 2016. Nested stochastic modeling for insurance companies. Technical report, Society of Actuaries. Available at https://www.soa.org/research/2015-nested-stochastic-modeling.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, M. C. ed. 2016. Handbook of simulation optimization. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, G. 2013. Application of data clustering and machine learning in variable annuity valuation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 53(3): 795–801. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, G. 2015a. Application of metamodeling to the valuation of large variablbe annuity portfolios. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, 1103–14. doi:10.1109/WSC.2015.7408237.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, G. 2015b. A multi-asset Monte Carlo simulation model for the valuation of variable annuities. In Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, 3162–63. doi:10.1109/WSC.2015.7408450.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, G., and X. S. Lin. 2015. Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios under nested simulation: A functional data approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 62: 138–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, G., and X. S. Lin. 2017. Efficient greek calculation of variable annuity portfolios for dynamic hedging: A two-level metamodeling approach. North American Actuarial Journal 21(2): 161–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman, P. 2013. Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering, Vol. 53. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gordy, M. B., and S. Juneja. 2010. Nested simulation in portfolio risk measurement. Management Science 56(10): 1833–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. R. 2001. A regime-switching model of long-term stock returns. North American Actuarial Journal 5(2): 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. R. 2003. Investment guarantees: Modeling and risk management for equity-linked life insurance, Vol. 215. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, H., B. L. Nelson, and J. Staum. 2010. A confidence interval procedure for expected shortfall risk measurement via two-level simulation. Operations Research 58(5): 1481–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’Ecuyer, P. 1990. A unified view of the IPA, SF, and LR gradient estimation techniques. Management Science 36(11): 1364–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M., and J. Staum. 2010. Stochastic kriging for efficient nested simulation of expected shortfall. The Journal of Risk 12(3): 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall C., M. R. Hardy, and D. Saunders. 2010. Valuation of a guaranteed minimum income benefit. North American Actuarial Journal 14(1): 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ng A. C. Y., and J. S. H. Li. 2013. Pricing and hedging variable annuity guarantees with multiasset stochastic investment models. North American Actuarial Journal 17(1): 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutes Canada. 2017. Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test. Technical report, Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutes Canada. Available at http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng/Docs/LICAT18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wirch J. L., and M. R. Hardy. 1999. A synthesis of risk measures for capital adequacy. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 25(3): 337–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar