Pricing Flood Insurance with a Hierarchical Physics-Based Model

REFERENCES

• American Meteorological Society. 2019. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations. Available at https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/authors/journal-and-bams-authors/formatting-and-manuscript-components/list-of-acronyms-and-abbreviations/.
   Google Scholar
• Atreya, A., S. Hanger, H. Kunreuther, J. Linnerooth-Bayer, and E. Michel-Kerjan. 2015. A comparison of residential flood insurance markets in 25 countries. Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. A. 1963. Insurance rates with minimum bias. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society 50 (93); 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, O. 2016. Guide d’utilisation 2016—Grilles climatiques quotidiennes du Programme de surveillance du climat du Québec, version 1.2. Québec: Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, Direction du suivi de l’état de l’environnement.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnifait, L. 2005. Développement de courbes submersion-dommages pour l’habitat résidentiel québécois. Ph.D. diss. Institut national de la recherche scientifique.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., J. Friedman, C. J. Stone, and R. Olshen. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, G. W. 2016. Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System: Hydraulic reference manual. Technical Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Centre d’expertise hydrique du Québec. 2015. Atlas hydroclimatique du Québec méridional—Impact des changements climatiques sur les régimes de crue, d’étiage et d’hydraulicité á l’horizon 2050. Québec: Centre d’expertise hydrique du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, M. 2018. A watershed moment: Private flood insurance is here. Casualty Actuarial Society Webinar. Available at https://www.casact.org/education/webinar/2018/index.cfm?fa=flood.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. 2018. The global risks report 2018. 13th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Available at http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRR18_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dantzig, D. 1956. Economic decision problems for flood prevention. Econometrica 3 (24): 276–87.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, D., S. Herath, and K. Musiake. 2003. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology 277 (1–2): 24–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falter, D., N. V. Dung, S. Vorogushyn, K. Schröter, Y. Hundecha, H. Kreibich, H. Apel, F. Theisselmann, and B. Merz. 2016. Continuous, large-scale simulation model for flood risk assessments: Proof-of-concept. Jourmal of Flood Risk Managent 9 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flato, G., J. Marotzke, B. Abiodun, P. Braconnot, S. C. Chou, W. J. Collins, P. Cox, F. Driouech, S. Emori, V. Eyring, et al. 2013. Evaluation of climate models. In Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley, pp. 741–866. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_Chapter09_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, J., R. Turcotte, S. Massicotte, R. Moussa, J. Fitzback, and J. Villeneuve. 2001. A distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. Part 2: Application to the Chaudière watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6 (2): 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. G. 1972. Insurance and the natural hazards. ASTIN Bulletin 7 (1): 4–58.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. G. 1984. Natural hazard risk assessment for an insurance program. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 9 (30): 57–128.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gaborit, É., S. Ricard, S. Lachance-Cloutier, F. Anctil, and R. Turcotte. 2015. Comparing global and local calibration schemes from a differential split-sample test perspective. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 52 (11): 990–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennaretti, F., L. Sangelantoni, and P. Grenier. 2015. Toward daily climate scenarios for Canadian Arctic coastal zones with more realistic temperature–precipitation interdependence. Journal of Geophysical Research - D: Atmospheres 120 (23): 11862–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenier, P. 2018. Two types of physical inconsistency to avoid with univariate quantile mapping: A case study over North America concerning relative humidity and its parent variables. Journal of Applied Meteorology Climatology 57 (2): 347–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbel, E. J. 1941. The return period of flood flows. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12 (2): 163–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, H. V., H. Kling, K. K. Yilmaz, and G. F. Martinez. 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology 377 (1-2): 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitson, B. C., J. Daron, R. G. Crane, M. F. Zermoglio, and C. Jack. 2014. Interrogating empirical–statistical downscaling. Climate Change 122 (4): 539–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, R. F., D. W. McKenney, E. J. Milewska, M. F. Hutchinson, P. Papadopol, L. A. Vincent, R. F. Hopkinson, D. W. McKenney, E. J. Milewska, M. F. Hutchinson, et al. 2011. Impact of aligning climatological day on gridding daily maximum minimum temperature and precipitation over Canada. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 50 (8): 1654–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, M. F., D. W. McKenney, K. Lawrence, J. H. Pedlar, R. F. Hopkinson, E. Milewska, P. Papadopol, M. F. Hutchinson, D. W. McKenney, K. Lawrence et al., 2009. Development and testing of Canada-wide interpolated spatial models of daily minimum maximum temperature and precipitation for 1961 2003. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 48 (4): 725–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance Bureau of Canada. 2015. The financial management of flood risk. Insurance Bureau of Canada. Available at http://assets.ibc.ca/Documents/Natural%20Disasters/The_Financial_Management_of_Flood_Risk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley, p. 1535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman, S. N., M. Bočkarjova, M. Kok, and P. Bernardini. 2008. Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in The Netherlands. Ecological Economics 66 (1): 77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. W., M. B. Parlange, and P. Naveau. 2002. Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Advances in Water Resources 25, 1287–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klugman, S. A., H. H. Panjer, and G. E. Willmot. 2012. Loss models: From data to decisions. Hoboken, NJ: 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mailhot, A., G. Talbot, S. Ricard, R. Turcotte, and K. Guinard. 2018. Assessing the potential impacts of dam operation on daily flow at ungauged river reaches. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 18: 156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, D., M. Ceci, and A. Appice. 2005. Mining model trees from spatial data. In Knowledge discovery in databases: PKDD 2005, vol. 3721, 169–80. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Maraun, D. 2016. Bias correcting climate change simulations—A critical review. Current Climate Change Reports 2 (4): 211–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClenahan, C. 2001. Ratemaking. In Foundations of casualty actuarial science, 4th ed. 75–148. Casualty Actuarial Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques. 2015. Cadre de référence hydrologique du Québec (CRHQ) [Données numériques vectorielles]. MDDEFP-DPEP, 1/20000. Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, Direction générale de l’écologie et de la conservation, Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques. 2018. Atlas hydroclimatique du Québec méridional — Impact des changements climatiques sur les régimes de crue, d’étiage et d’hydraulicité à l’horizon 2050 et 2080. Québec: Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques.
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, L., M. Hulme, T. Carter, R. Leemans, M. Lal, P. Whetton, L. Hay, R. Jones, T. Kittel, J. Smith, et al. 2001. Climate scenario development. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, pp.739–68. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michel-Kerjan, E. O., and C. Kousky. 2010. Come rain or shine: Evidence on flood insurance purchases in Florida. Journal of Risk and Insurance 77 (2): 369–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, P. 2010. Constructing climate knowledge with computer models. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (4): 565–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouranos. 2015. Vers l’adaptation. Synthèse des connaissances sur les changements climatiques au Québec. Montréal: Ouranos.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel, Y., W. J. Botzen, J. C. Aerts, and T. K. Dijkstra. 2015. Risk allocation in a public-private catastrophe insurance system: An actuarial analysis of deductibles, stop-loss, and premiums. Journal of Flood Risk Management 8 (2): 116–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricard, S., R. Bourdillon, D. Roussel, and R. Turcotte. 2013. Global calibration of distributed hydrological models for large-scale applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 18 (6): 719–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shangguan, W., Y. Dai, Q. Duan, B. Liu, and H. Yuan. 2014. A global soil data set for earth system modeling. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 6 (1): 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1994). Flood damage estimation—A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions. Water SA 20 (3): 232–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surminski, S., and J. Eldridge. 2017. Flood insurance in England—An assessment of the current and newly proposed insurance scheme in the context of rising flood risk. Journal of Flood Risk Management 10 (4): 415–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szeto, K., T. Motchalova, and P. Vivier. 2008. On the preparation of a 1-km resolution gridded soil texture dataset—A CRB internal report. Technical Report, Environment Canada, Downview, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq, M. A., O. A. Hoes, and N. C. Van de Giesen. 2014. Development of a risk-based framework to integrate flood insurance. Journal of Flood Risk Management 7 (4): 291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Themeßl, M. J., A. Gobiet, and G. Heinrich. 2012. Empirical-statistical downscaling and error correction of regional climate models and its impact on the climate change signal. Climate Change 112 (2): 449–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resources Research 43 (1): 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vuuren, D. P., J. Edmonds, M. Kainuma, K. Riahi, A. Thomson, K. Hibbard, G. C. Hurtt, T. Kram, V. Krey, J.-F. Lamarque, et al. 2011. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climate Change 109 (1-2): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V. 2018. Machine learning in individual claims reserving. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2018 (6): 465–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V., and C. Buser. 2017. Data analytics for non-life insurance pricing. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper. Swiss Finance Institute. Available at https://www.sfi.ch/de/publications/n-16-68-data-analytics-for-non-life-insurance-pricing-m.-v.-wuethrich-and-c.-buser-2016
   Google Scholar