Mixture Composite Regression Models with Multi-type Feature Selection

References

• Bakar, S. A., N. A. Hamzah, M. Maghsoudi, and S. Nadarajah. 2015. Modeling loss data using composite models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 61:146–54. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blostein, M., and T. Miljkovic. 2019. On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 85:35–46. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderín-Ojeda, E., and C. F. Kwok. 2016. Modeling claims data with composite Stoppa models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2016 (9):817–36. doi:10.1080/03461238.2015.1034763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooray, K., and M. M. Ananda. 2005. Modeling actuarial data with a composite lognormal-Pareto model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2005 (5):321–34. doi:10.1080/03461230510009763
   Google Scholar
• Devriendt, S., K. Antonio, T. Reynkens, and R. Verbelen. 2021. Sparse regression with multi-type regularized feature modeling. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 96:248–61. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embrechts, P., C. Klüppelberg, and T. Mikosch. 1997. Modelling extremal events: For insurance and finance. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and R. Li. 2001. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (456):1348–60. doi:10.1198/016214501753382273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frees, E. W. 2009. Regression modeling with actuarial and financial applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frees, E. W., R. A. Derrig, and G. Meyers. 2014. Predictive modeling applications in actuarial science. Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, T. C., A. L. Badescu, and X. S. Lin. 2019. A class of mixture of experts models for general insurance: Application to correlated claim frequencies. ASTIN Bulletin 49 (3):647–88. doi:10.1017/asb.2019.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, T. C., A. L. Badescu, and X. S. Lin. 2021. A new class of severity regression models with an application to IBNR prediction. North American Actuarial Journal 25 (2):206–31. doi:10.1080/10920277.2020.1729813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, T. C., A. L. Badescu, and X. S. Lin. 2022. Fitting censored and truncated regression data using the mixture of experts models. North American Actuarial Journal. doi:10.1080/10920277.2021.2013896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grün, B., and T. Miljkovic. 2019. Extending composite loss models using a general framework of advanced computational tools. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2019 (8):642–60. doi:10.1080/03461238.2019.1596151
   Google Scholar
• Gui, W., R. Huang, and X. S. Lin. 2018. Fitting the Erlang mixture model to data via a GEM-CMM algorithm. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 343:189–205. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2018.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., H. Chang, and E. A. Valdez. 2021. A non-convex regularization approach for stable estimation of loss development factors. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2021 (9):779–803. doi:10.1080/03461238.2021.1882550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, A. 2010. New estimation and feature selection methods in mixture-of-experts models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 38 (4):519–39. doi:10.1002/cjs.10083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, A., and J. Chen. 2007. Variable selection in finite mixture of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 (479):1025–38. doi:10.1198/016214507000000590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudagé, C., S. Desmettre, and J. Wenzel. 2019. Severity modeling of extreme insurance claims for tariffication. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 88:77–92. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., and X. S. Lin. 2010. Modeling and evaluating insurance losses via mixtures of Erlang distributions. North American Actuarial Journal 14 (1):107–30. doi:10.1080/10920277.2010.10597580
   Google Scholar
• Leisch, F. 2004. Flexmix: A general framework for finite mixture models and latent class regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software 11 (8):1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v011.i08
   Google Scholar
• Miljkovic, T., and B. Grün. 2016. Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 70:387–96. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., and S. A. Bakar. 2014. New composite models for the Danish fire insurance data. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2014 (2):180–87. doi:10.1080/03461238.2012.695748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder, J. A., and R. W. Wedderburn. 1972. Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General) 135 (3):370–84. doi:10.2307/2344614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelker, M.-R., and G. Tutz. 2017. A uniform framework for the combination of penalties in generalized structured models. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification 11 (1):97–120. doi:10.1007/s11634-015-0205-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi, P. 2020. A generalised property exposure rating framework that incorporates scale-independent losses and maximum possible loss uncertainty. ASTIN Bulletin 50 (2):513–53. doi:10.1017/asb.2020.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigeon, M., and M. Denuit. 2011. Composite lognormal-Pareto model with random threshold. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2011 (3):177–92. doi:10.1080/03461231003690754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, S. I. 2007. Heavy-tail phenomena: Probabilistic and statistical modeling. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Reynkens, T., R. Verbelen, J. Beirlant, and K. Antonio. 2017. Modelling censored losses using splicing: A global fit strategy with mixed Erlang and extreme value distributions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 77:65–77. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollnik, D. P. 2007. On composite lognormal-Pareto models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2007 (1):20–33. doi:10.1080/03461230601110447
   Google Scholar
• Scollnik, D. P., and C. Sun. 2012. Modeling with Weibull-Pareto models. North American Actuarial Journal 16 (2):260–72. doi:10.1080/10920277.2012.10590640
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, W., K. Sever, and H. Ševčíková. 2006. Efficient calculation of the NPMLE of a mixing distribution for mixtures of exponentials. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 50 (5):1248–71. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58 (1):267–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzougas, G., S. Vrontos, and N. Frangos. 2014. Optimal bonus–malus systems using finite mixture models. ASTIN Bulletin 44 (2):417–44. doi:10.1017/asb.2013.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzougas, G., S. Vrontos, and N. Frangos. 2018. Bonus–malus systems with two-component mixture models arising from different parametric families. North American Actuarial Journal 22 (1):55–91. doi:10.1080/10920277.2017.1368398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, H. 2006. The adaptive Lasso and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101 (476):1418–29. doi:10.1198/016214506000000735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 58 (1):267–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzougas, G., S. Vrontos, and N. Frangos. 2014. Optimal bonus–malus systems using finite mixture models. ASTIN Bulletin 44 (2):417–44. doi:10.1017/asb.2013.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzougas, G., S. Vrontos, and N. Frangos. 2018. Bonus–malus systems with two-component mixture models arising from different parametric families. North American Actuarial Journal 22 (1):55–91. doi:10.1080/10920277.2017.1368398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, H. 2006. The adaptive Lasso and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101 (476):1418–29. doi:10.1198/016214506000000735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar