Computing and Estimating Distortion Risk Measures: How to Handle Analytically Intractable Cases?

References

• Albrecht, P. 2004. Risk measures. In Encyclopedia of actuarial science, ed. B. Sundt and J. Teugels, vol. 3, 1493–501. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Artzner, P., F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath, D. 1999. Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance 9 (3):203–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balbás, A., J. Garrido, and S. Mayoral. 2009. Properties of distortion risk measures. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 11 (3):385–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belles-Sampera, J., M. Guillén, and M. Santolino. 2014. Beyond Value-at-Risk: GlueVaR distortion risk measures. Risk Analysis 34 (1):121–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belles-Sampera, J., M. Guillén, and M. Santolino. 2016. The use of flexible quantile-based measures in risk assessment. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 45 (6):1670–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., B. Jones, and R. Zitikis. 2009. Robust fitting of claim severity distributions and the method of trimmed moments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (6):2028–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., and A. Kleefeld. 2011. Folded and log-folded-t distributions as models for insurance loss data. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2011 (1):59–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., and A. Kleefeld. 2014. Authors’ reply to “Letter to the Editor: Regarding folded models and the paper by Brazauskas and Kleefeld (2011)” by Scollnik. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2014 (8):753–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., and A. Kleefeld. 2016. Modeling severity and measuring tail risk of Norwegian fire claims. North American Actuarial Journal 20 (1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., and T. Kaiser. 2004. Discussion of “Empirical estimation of risk measures and related quantities” by Jones and Zitikis. North American Actuarial Journal, 8 (3):114–17.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, W. 1968. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol. 1, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, R., and H. W. Volkmer. 2012. Analytical calculation of risk measures for variable annuity guaranteed benefits. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 51 (3):636–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, R., and H. W. Volkmer. 2014. Spectral methods for the calculation of risk measures for variable annuity guaranteed benefits. ASTIN Bulletin 44 (3):653–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, R., X. Jing, and J. Dhaene. 2017. Comonotonic approximations of risk measures for variable annuity guaranteed benefits with dynamic policyholder behavior. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 311:272–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, E., and Z. Landsman. 2006. Tail variance premium with applications for elliptical portfolio of risks. ASTIN Bulletin 36 (2):433–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, E., R. Wang, and R. Zitikis. 2017. Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocations, and heavy-tailed risks. Journal of Banking and Finance 83:70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. 1994. Continuous univariate distributions. Vol. 1, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. L., and R. Zitikis. 2003. Empirical estimation of risk measures and related quantities (with discussion). North American Actuarial Journal 7 (4):44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and R. Zitikis. 2004. Authors’ reply to Discussion of “Empirical estimation of risk measures and related quantities” by Brazauskas and Kaiser. North American Actuarial Journal, 8 (3):117–18.
   Google Scholar
• Klugman, S. A., H. H. Panjer, and G. E. Willmot. 2012. Loss models: From data to decisions. 4th ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., and S. A. A. Bakar. 2015. New folded models for the log-transformed Norwegian fire claim data. Communications in statistics: Theory and methods 44 (20):4408–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollnik, D. P. M. 2007. On composite lognormal-Pareto models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2007 (1):20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Scollnik, D. P. M. 2014. Letter to the Editor: Regarding folded models and the paper by Brazauskas and Kleefeld (2011). Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2014 (3):278–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollnik, D. P. M., and C. Sun. 2012. Modeling with Weibull-Pareto models. North American Actuarial Journal 16 (2):260–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tapiero, C. S. 2004. Risk management: An interdisciplinary framework. In Encyclopedia of actuarial science, ed. B. Sundt and J. Teugels, vol. 3, 1483–93. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., R. Wang, and R. Zitikis. 2021. Risk measures induced by efficient insurance contracts. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 103:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., and R. Zitikis. 2021. An axiomatic foundation for the expected shortfall. Management Science 67 (3):1413–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. 1995. Insurance pricing and increased limits ratemaking by proportional hazards transforms. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17 (1):43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. 2000. A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance 67 (1):15–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. 2002. A universal framework for pricing financial and insurance risks. ASTIN Bulletin 32 (2):213–34.
   Google Scholar
• Young, V. R. 2004. Premium principles. In Encyclopedia of actuarial science, ed. B. Sundt and J. Teugels, vol. 3, 1322–31. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., V. Brazauskas, and J. Ghorai. 2018. Robust and efficient fitting of severity models and the method of winsorized moments. ASTIN Bulletin 48 (1):275–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar