The Semantics of Eating in Afrikaans and Northern Sotho: Cross-linguistic Variation in Metaphor

REFERENCES

• Boers, F. (2003). Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 231–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (1997). A few metaphorical models in (western) economic discourse. In W.A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & Waugh, L. ( Eds.), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 115–130). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Callies, M., & Zimmermann, R. (2002). Cross-cultural metaphors: Investigating domain mappings across cultures. Marburg, Germany: Philipps-Universität Marburg. Retrieved from http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/mcallies/metaphor/complete-report-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2003). Metaphorical expressions and culture: an indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, A., & Potter, L. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1231–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it in the cultural world. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen ( Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics ( pp. 145–166). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (2007). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In V. Evans, B. Bergen & J. Zinken ( Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader: Advances in cognitive linguistics ( pp. 40–56). Sheffield, England: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Costa Limab, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, M. (1948). The classification of the Bantu languages. London, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (1995). Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and psychology in the light of cross-cultural evidence. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury ( Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world ( pp. 181–196). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses. Z. (1999). Metaphor: Does it constitute or reflect cultural models? In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen ( Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics ( pp. 167–188). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2007). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In V. Evans, B. Bergen & J. Zinken ( Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader: Advances in cognitive linguistics ( pp. 267–315). Sheffield, England: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, Y., Assaf, D., Cohen, Y., Last, M., Argamon, S., Howard, N., & Frieder, O. (2013). Metaphor identification in large texts corpora. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (1997). Eating and drinking as sources of metaphor in English. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa, 6(2), 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2009a). A cross-linguistic overview of “eat” and “drink.” In J. Newman ( Ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking ( pp. 1–26). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2009b). Preface. In J. Newman ( Ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking ( pp. vii–xii). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2011). Corpora and cognitive linguistics. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 521–559.
   Google Scholar
• Pragglejaz Group. (2007). A practical and flexible method for identifying metaphorically-used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shutova, E., Devereux, B. J., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Conceptual metaphor theory meets the data: A corpus-based human annotation study. Lang Resources & Evaluation, 47, 1261–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simó, J. (2011). Metaphors of blood in American English and Hungarian: A cross-linguistic corpus investigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2897–2910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G., & Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (1999). Introduction. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen ( Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics ( pp. 1–8). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanowitsch, A. (2007). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries ( Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy ( pp. 1–16). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (Eds.). (2007). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (2009). All people eat and drink. Does this mean that “eat” and “drink” are universal human concepts? In J. Newman ( Ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking ( pp. 65–89). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar