Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising: A Corpus-Based Account

References

• Ang, S., & Lim, E. (2006). The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 39–53. doi:10.1080/00913367.2006.10639226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, C. (2006). Services marketing (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Excel Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T., & Yen, C.-T. (2013). Missing ingredients in metaphor advertising: The right formula of metaphor type, product type, and need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 80–94. doi:10.1080/00913367.2012.749090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, M. (1924). Principles of merchandising. Chicago, IL: A. W. Shaw.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2009b). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp. 56–74). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2009a). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.). (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–342. doi:10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, L., & Kraljevic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. In F. Gonzálvez, S. Peña, & L. Pérez-Hernández (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Special issue of the Review of Cognitive Linguistics (Vol. 9(1), pp. 153–178). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1997). Marketing: An introduction (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 1–38. doi:10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Lester, P. M. (1995). Syntactic theory of visual communication. Retrieved from http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/lester/writings/viscomtheory.html
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., & Perez-Sobrino, P. (Forthcoming). Eyelashes, speedometers or breasts? An experimental cross-cultural approach to multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. In A. Baicchi and A. Bagasheva (Eds.), Figurative language we live by: The cognitive underpinnings and mechanisms of figurativity in language. Rome, Italy: Carocci Editore.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. (2005). Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures and words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7–20. doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S., & Reichert, T. (1999). The message is in the metaphor: Assessing the comprehension of metaphors in advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 1–12. doi:10.1080/00913367.1999.10673592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hernández, L. (2014). Cognitive grounding for cross-cultural commercial communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(2), 203–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Hernández, L. (2013). Illocutionary constructions: (Multiple-source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification links. Language & Communication, 33(2), 128–149. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2013). Metaphor use in advertising: Analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a greenwashing advertisement. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor in focus: Philosophical perspectives on metaphor use (pp. 67–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2016). Shockvertising: Patterns of conceptual interaction constraining advertising creativity. Círculo De Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 65. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, W., & McCarthy, J. (2004). Basic marketing: A global managerial approach. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Díez, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Pérez-Hernández, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 161–185. doi:10.1080/10926488.2011.583189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–118). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Villacañas, B., & White, M. (2013). Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificación García advertising campaigns. In L. Hidalgo & B. Kraljevic (Eds.), Metaphorical creativity across modes: Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World (Vol. 3(2), pp. 220–239). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar