1,023
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Spatial Subsystem of Moral Metaphors: A Cognitive Semantic Study

, &

References

  • Barcelona, A. (2000). On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31–58). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2011). The chain of being: A hierarchy of morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(5), 428–446. doi:10.1177/1745691611414587
  • Casasanto, D. (2009). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–145). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Casasanto, D. (2010). Space for thinking. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 453–478). London, UK: Equinox.
  • Casasanto, D. (2016). Linguistic relativity. In N. Riemer (Ed.), Routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 158–174). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Spatial language and abstract concepts. WIREs Cognitive Science, 5, 139–149. doi:10.1002/wcs.1271
  • Cienki, A. (1998). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 107–150. doi:10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.107
  • Crawford, L. E. (2009). Conceptual metaphors of affect. Emotion Review, 1(2), 129–139. doi:10.1177/1754073908100438
  • Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dong, P., Huang, X., & Zhong, C. (2015). Ray of hope: Hopelessness increases preferences for brighter lighting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(1), 84–91. doi:10.1177/1948550614542344
  • Forceville, C., & Renckens, T. (2013). The good is light and bad is dark metaphor in feature films. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2), 160–179. doi:10.1075/msw.3.2.03for
  • Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Gattis, M. (Ed.). (2001). Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetic mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48, 529–562. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
  • Gibbs, R. W. (2014). Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 17–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Grady, J. (1997a). Foundation of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation) University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
  • Grady, J. (1997b). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. doi:10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267
  • Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphors: Correlations vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Jäkel, O. (2002). Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Metaphorik.de, 2, 20–42.
  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Johnson, M. (2014). Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the perspective of cognitive science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (Eds.). (2014). The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. doi:10.1037/a0020970
  • Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1423–1425. doi:10.1177/0956797610382788
  • Lizardo, O. (2012). The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 367–393. doi:10.1515/cog-2012-0011
  • Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
  • Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Caven, A. J. (2008). Why a Big Mac is a good mac: Associations between affect and size. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 46–55. doi:10.1080/01973530701866516
  • Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2004). Why good guys wear white: Automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. American Psychological Society, 15(2), 82–87.
  • Meier, B. P., Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 757–767. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.001
  • Radden, G. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 93–108). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219–1222. doi:10.1111/psci.2008.19.issue-12
  • Schneider, I. K., Rutjens, B., Jostmann, N. B., & Lakens, D. (2011). Weighty matters: Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2(5), 474–478. doi:10.1177/1948550610397895
  • Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1
  • Sherman, G. D., & Clore, G. L. (2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1019–1025. doi:10.1111/psci.2009.20.issue-8
  • Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 499–535. doi:10.1111/tops.2011.3.issue-3
  • Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008a). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19, 302–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
  • Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008b). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606–607. doi:10.1126/science.1162548
  • Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1257–1267. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v39:7
  • Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yu, N. (2009). The Chinese HEART in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Yu, N. (2015). Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(3), 163–183. doi:10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500
  • Yu, N. (2016). Spatial metaphors for morality: A perspective from Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 108–125. doi:10.1080/10926488.2016.1150763
  • Yu, N., & Jia, D. (2016). Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 147–180. doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0080
  • Zhong, C., & House, J. (2014). Dirt, pollution, and purity: A metaphoric perspective on morality. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 109–131). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Zhong, C., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838–842. doi:10.1111/psci.2008.19.issue-9
  • Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452. doi:10.1126/science.1130726

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.