The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review

References

• References marked with * were included in the review. An overview of all references included in the systematic review can be retrieved from the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/6n5gg)
   Google Scholar
• *A’Beckett, L. (2012). The play of voices in metaphor discourse: A case study of “NATIONS ARE BROTHERS.” Metaphor and Symbol, 27(2), 171–194. doi:10.1080/10926488.2012.665797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ahn, H. K., Kim, H. J., & Aggarwal, P. (2014). Helping fellow beings anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychological Science, 25(1), 224–229. doi:10.1177/0956797613496823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Alexandrescu, L. (2014). Mephedrone, assassin of youth: The rhetoric of fear in contemporary drug scares. Crime, Media, Culture, 10(1), 23–37. doi:10.1177/1741659013511975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Andréani, G. (2004). The “War on Terror”: Good cause, wrong concept. Survival, 46(4), 31–50. doi:10.1080/00396330412331342446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113–134. doi: 10.1080/15213260701301194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bartolucci, V. (2012). Terrorism rhetoric under the Bush administration: Discourses and effects. Journal of Language and Politics, 11(4), 562–582. doi:10.1075/jlp.11.4.05bar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougher, L. D. (2012). The case for metaphor in political reasoning and cognition. Political Psychology, 33(1), 145–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Brugman, B. C., Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y., & Steen, G. J. (2016). HIP: A method for linguistic hyperbole identification in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(3), 163–178. doi:10.1080/10926488.2016.1187041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016), Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. doi: 10.1111/comt.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D. (2010). Space for thinking. In V. Evans, & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: State of the art and new directions (pp. 453–478). London, England: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• *Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563–581. doi:10.1177/0957926506066345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (pp. 19–51). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• *Dragojevic, M., Bell, R. A., & McGlone, M. S. (2014). Giving radon gas life through language effects of linguistic agency assignment in health messages about inanimate threats. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(1), 89–98. doi:10.1177/0261927X13495738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Elwood, W. N. (1995). Declaring war on the home front: Metaphor, presidents, and the war on drugs. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(2), 93–114. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1002_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Steen, G. J. (Eds.). (1999). Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected Papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 (Vol. 175). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 163–189. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hartman, T. K. (2012). Toll booths on the information superhighway? Policy metaphors in the case of net neutrality. Political Communication, 29(3), 278–298. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.694983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hayden, S. (2003). Family metaphors and the nation: Promoting a politics of care through the Million Mom March. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(3), 196–215. doi:10.1080/0033563032000125313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ismael, T. Y., & Ismael, J. S. (1999). Cowboy warfare, biological diplomacy: Disarming metaphors as weapons of mass destruction. Politics and the Life Sciences, 18(1), 70–78. doi:10.1017/S0730938400023571
   Google Scholar
• *Ivie, R. L. (1999). Fire, flood, and red fever: Motivating metaphors of global emergency in the Truman doctrine speech. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(3), 570–591. doi:10.1111/j.0268-2141.2003.00050.x
   Google Scholar
• *Jansen, C., Van Nistelrooij, M., Olislagers, K., Van Sambeek, M., & De Stadler, L. (2010). A fire station in your body: Metaphors in educational texts on HIV/AIDS. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 28(2), 133–139. doi:10.2989/16073614.2010.519102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jaspaert, K., Van De Velde, F., Brône, G., Feyaerts, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2011). Does framing work? An empirical study of simplifying models for sustainable food production. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(3), 459–490. doi:10.1515/cogl.2011.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jia, L., & Smith, E. R. (2013). Distance makes the metaphor grow stronger: A psychological distance model of metaphor use. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 492–497. Doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, L. A., Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2014). Embodied metaphor and abstract problem solving: Testing a metaphoric fit hypothesis in the health domain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for systematic reviews. (Report No. TR/SE-0401). Keele, UK: Keele University.
   Google Scholar
• *Koller, V. (2002). “A shotgun wedding”: Co-occurrence of war and marriage metaphors in mergers and acquisitions discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(3), 179–203. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2005). Some like it bad: Testing a model for perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7(2), 107–144. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krennmayr, T., Bowdle, B. F., Mulder, G., & Steen, G. J. (2014). Economic competition is like auto racing: Building metaphorical schemas when reading text. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 65–89. doi:10.1075/msw.4.1.04kre
   Google Scholar
• *Kuusisto, R. (2002). Heroic tale, game, and business deal? Western metaphors in action in Kosovo. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88(1), 50–68. doi:10.1080/00335630209384359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1421–1427. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02462.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1),159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959–983. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lederer, J. (2013). “Anchor baby”: A conceptual explanation for pejoration. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 248–266. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Kashima, Y. (2009). Understanding the relationship between attribute-based and metaphor-based dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 747–762. doi:10.1177/1368430209347726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., Bortfeld, H., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2007). Laying it on thin: Analogical cue frequency in the manipulation of choice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 721–731. doi:10.1177/0146167206298565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mio, J. S. (1997). Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(2), 113–133. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2
   Google Scholar
• *Mirghani, S. (2011). The war on piracy: Analyzing the discursive battles of corporate and government-sponsored anti-piracy media campaigns. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(2), 113–134. doi:10.1080/15295036.2010.514933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morant Marco, R. M., & Martín López, A. M. (2011). La metáfora bélica durante la crisis sanitaria de la gripe A [Wartime metaphors during the H1N1 flu health crisis]. Círculo De Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 46, 91–112. doi:10.5209/rev_CLAC.2011.v46.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Morris, M. W., Sheldon, O. J., Ames, D. R., & Young, M. J. (2007). Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 174–192. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphors and political discourse. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• *Musolff, A. (2014). Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors: Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(2), 218–233. doi:10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nerlich, B., Hamilton, C., & Rowe, V. (2002). Conceptualizing foot and mouth disease: The socio-cultural role of metaphors, frames and narratives. Metaphorik.De, 2(2002), 90–108. Retrieved from http://www.metaphorik.de/sites/www.metaphorik.de/files/journal-pdf/02_2002_nerlich.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Nerlich, B., & James, R. (2009). “The post-antibiotic apocalypse” and the “war on superbugs”: Catastrophe discourse in microbiology, its rhetorical form and political function. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 574–590. doi:10.1177/0963662507087974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *O’Brien, G. V. (2003). Indigestible food, conquering hordes, and waste materials: Metaphors of immigrants and the early immigration restriction debate in the United States. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(1), 33–47. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottati, V., Renstrom, R., & Price, E. (2014). The metaphorical framing model: Political communication and public opinion. In M. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 179–202). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• *Parrott, R., & Smith, R. A. (2014). Defining genes using “blueprint” versus “instruction” metaphors: Effects for genetic determinism, response efficacy, and perceived control. Health Communication, 29(2), 137–146. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.729181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Quintilian (1959). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian: With an English translation by H. E. Butler, MA (Vol. 3). London, England: William Heinemann (original work published around AD 95).
   Google Scholar
• *Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes, 30(1), 57–86. doi: 10.1207/S15326950dp3001_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Santa Ana, O. (1999). “Like an animal I was treated”: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191–224. doi:10.1177/0957926599010002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sopory, P. (2008). Metaphor and intra-attitudinal structural coherence. Communication Studies, 59(2), 164–181. doi:10.1080/10510970802062493
   Google Scholar
• *Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. doi:10.1080/10926480802426753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J. (2011). Metaphor, language, and discourse processes. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 585–591. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.606424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Vol. 14). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS One, 9(12), e113536. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514–521. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829. doi:10.1177/107769900007700406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS One, 6(2), e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS One, 8(1), e52961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar