Primary Metaphors across Languages: Difficulty as Weight and Solidity

References

• Casasanto, D. (2016). Linguistic relativity. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 158–174). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D. (2017a). Relationships between language and cognition. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 19–37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D. (2017b). The hierarchical structure of mental metaphors. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 46–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetic mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. (1997a). Foundation of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. (1997b). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. doi:10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1595–1614. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E., & Ascoli, G. A. (2017). Sources and targets in primary metaphor theory: Looking back and thinking ahead. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 27–45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampe, B. (Ed.). (2017). Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HYDCD. Hànyŭ Dà Cídiăn [汉语大辞典Grand dictionary of Chinese language]. Retrieved from http://www.hydcd.com/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2013). The metaphor-metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88. doi:10.1080/10926488.2013.768498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2015). Surprise as a conceptual category. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 270–290. doi:10.1075/rcl.13.2.01kov
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. doi:10.1515/cog-2016-0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Longman dictionary of contemporary English. Retrieved from https://www.ldoceonline.com
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2011). Corpora and cognitive linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 11(2), 521–559. doi:10.1590/S1984-63982011000200010
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English living dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/
   Google Scholar
• Slepian, M. L., Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2012). Proprioception and person perception: Politicians and professors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1621–1628. doi:10.1177/0146167212457786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In S. T. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 63–104). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Stickles, E., David, O., Dodge, E., & Hong, H. (2016). Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory: A structured repository for metaphor analysis. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 166–213. doi:10.1075/cf.8.2.03sti
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Svanlund, J. (2007). Metaphor and convention. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 3–14. doi:10.1515/COG.2007.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, B., & Matlock, T. (2017). Primary metaphors are both cultural and embodied. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 99–115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• XDHYCD. (2002). Xiàndài Hànyŭ cídiăn [现代汉语词典 Contemporary Chinese dictionary (Chinese-English ed.)]. Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• XDHYCD. (2012). Xiàndài Hànyŭ cídiăn [现代汉语词典 Contemporary Chinese dictionary] (6th ed.). Beijing, China: Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• XSDHYDCD. (2004). Xīn shídài Hàn-Yīng dà cídiăn [新时代汉英大词典 New age Chinese-English dictionary]. Beijing, China: Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, N. (2017). Life as opera: A cultural metaphor in Chinese. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 65–87). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, N., & Jia, D. (2016). Metaphor in culture: Life is a show in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 147–180. doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, N., Yu, L., & Lee, Y. C. (2017). Primary metaphors: Importance as size and weight in a comparative perspective. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(4), 231–249. doi:10.1080/10926488.2017.1384276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar