The Interplay of Metaphor and Metonymy in Christian Symbols

References

• Barbour, I. G. (1976). Myths, models and paradigms. A comparative study in science and religion. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelona, A. (2000). The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelona, A. (2003). The metaphorical and metonymic understanding of the Trinitarian dogma. International Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelona, A. (2008). The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 208–281. doi:10.1075/arcl.6.10bar
   Google Scholar
• Benczes, R. (2006). Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, R. (2014). Charles Sanders Peirce. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce/
   Google Scholar
• Cirlot, J. E. (1990). A dictionary of symbols (2nd ed.). Trans. from Spanish by J. Sage. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Chapeaurouge, D. (2014). Symbole chrześcijańskie [The Christian symbols]. Trans. from German by G. Rawski. Kraków, Poland: Wydawnictwo WAM.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, O. (2001–2002). Metaphor, metonymy, and image schemas: An analysis of conceptual interaction patterns. Journal of English Studies, 3, 47–63. doi:10.18172/jes.69
   Google Scholar
• Dirven, R., & Radden, G. (2004). The cognitive basis of language: Language and thought. In R. Dirven & M. Verspoor (Eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics (pp. 1–23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 19–44). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Forstner, D. (2001). Świat symboliki chrześcijańskiej. Leksykon [The world of Christian symbols. A lexicon]. Trans. from German by W. Zakrzewska, P. Pachciarek & R. Turzyński. Warszawa, Poland: Instytut Wydawniczy Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, D. (2002). The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, L. (2002). Metaphtonymy. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349–377). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Gomariz, I. (2018). Analysis of metonymic triggers, metonymic chaining, and patterns of interaction with metaphors and with other metonymies as part of the metonymy database in the Córdoba project. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy. Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (pp. 75–96). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, J. (2006). The role of metaphor, metonymy, and conceptual blending in understanding advertisements: The case of drug-prevention ads. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 19(19), 169–190. doi:10.14198/raei.2006.19.10
   Google Scholar
• Kiełtyka, R. (2019). Patterns of metaphor-metonymy interactions in animal-specific complex lexical units. Linguistica Silesiana, 40, 225–256.
   Google Scholar
• Kołakowski, L. (2001). Religion. If there is no God … On God, the devil, sin and other worries of the so-called philosophy of religion. Chicago, IL: St. Augustine’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosecki, K. (2014). Metaphors and metonymies in American and British Signed Languages: A contrastive cognitive perspective. Linguistica Silesiana, 35, 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. A practical introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2011). The biblical story retold. A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar, S. T. Gries, & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics. Convergence and expansion (pp. 325–354). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Krzeszowski, T. P. (1997). Angels and devils in hell. On elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa, Poland: Energeia.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczok, M. (2011). The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in noun-to-verb conversion. In B. Bierwiaczonek, B. Cetnarowska, & A. Turula (Eds.), Syntax in Cognitive Grammar (pp. 41–54). Częstochowa, Poland: Wyższa Szkoła Lingwistyczna.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczok, M. (2014). The conceptualisation of the Christian life in John Henry Newman’s Parochial and Plain Sermons. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczok, M. (2016). The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in English noun+noun compounds. In G. Drożdż (Ed.), Studies in lexicogrammar: Theory and applications (pp. 193–210). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczok, M. (2020). Metaphorical interplay of words and gestures in the Catholic liturgy. In A. Baicchi (Ed.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language (pp. 209–222). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. With a new afterword. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (2009). Metonymic grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 45–71). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 329–356). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Negro, I. (2019). Metaphor and metonymy in food idioms. Languages, 4(3), 47. doi:10.3390/languages4030047
   Google Scholar
• Nerlich, B., Clarke, D. D., & Todd, Z. (1999). “Mommy, I like being a sandwich”: Metonymy in language acquisition. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 361–384). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• New Revised Standard Version. (1989). Grand Rapids, MI: National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Panther, K.-U. (2013). Motivation in language. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 407–432). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (2009). Introduction: On figuration in grammar. In K.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg, & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 1–44). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–124). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Diez, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Mendoza, F., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, M. F., & Harrison, R. K. (2006). The new Unger’s Bible dictionary. Chicago, IL: Moody Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 95–117). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar