Metaphorical Humor in Satirical News Shows: A Content Analysis

References

• Attardo, S. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3–4), 293–348. doi:10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293
   Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2005). The daily show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2013). Breaking boundaries| political media as discursive modes: A comparative analysis of interviews with Ron Paul from meet the press, tonight, the daily show, and hannity. International Journal of Communication, 7, 489–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G., & Jones, J. (2012). News parody in global perspective: Politics, power, and resistance. Popular Communication, 10(1–2), 2–13. doi:10.1080/15405702.2012.638566
   Google Scholar
• Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2021). From the daily show to last week tonight: A quantitative analysis of discursive integration in satirical television news. Journalism Studies, 22(9), 1181–1199. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2021.1929416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2022). Humor in satirical news headlines on Facebook: Analyzing humor structure and content, and their relations with audience engagement. Mass Communication and Society. doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2144747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caufield, R. P. (2008). The influence of “infoenterpropagainment”: Exploring the power of political satire as a distinct form of political humor. In J. C. Baumgartner & J. S. Morris (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age (pp. 3–20). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 551–558. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1998). Analogy and irony: Rebuttal to” rebuttal analogy”. Metaphor & Symbol, 13(1), 69–75. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1301_5
   Google Scholar
• Condren, C. (2012). Satire and definition. Humor, 25(4), 375–399. doi:10.1515/humor-2012-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, R. V., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1984). The use of analogies in written text. Instructional Science, 13(2), 99–117. doi:10.1007/BF00052380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droog, E., Burgers, C., & Steen, G. J. (2020). How satirists alternate between discursive modes: An introduction of the Humoristic Metaphors in Satirical News (HMSN) typology. International Journal of Communication, 14, 3964–3985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543–549. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies: Friend or foe. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 11–24). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L. (2016). Entertainment television and political campaigns: The political satire appropriateness (PSA) model. In W. L. Benoit (Ed.), Praeger handbook of political campaigning in the United States (pp. 171–190). ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Iliev, R., & Axelrod, R. (2017). The paradox of abstraction: Precision versus concreteness. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(3), 715–729. doi:10.1007/s10936-016-9459-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363–374. doi:10.2307/2529786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2013). The Swiss “Tina Fey effect”: The content of late-night political humor and the negative effects of political parody on the evaluation of politicians. Communication quarterly, 61(5), 596–614. doi:10.1080/01463373.2013.822405
   Google Scholar
• Oring, E. (2011). Parsing the joke: The general theory of verbal humor and appropriate incongruity. International Journal of Humor Research, 24(2), 203–222. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2011.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otieno, R. F., Owino, F. R., & Attyang, J. M. (2016). Metaphors in political discourse: A review of selected studies. International Journal of English and Literature, 7(2), 21–26. doi:10.5897/IJEL2015.0856
   Google Scholar
• Piata, A. (2016). When metaphor becomes a joke: Metaphor journeys from political ads to internet memes. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 39–56. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. doi:10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, G. (2004). The linguistic analysis of jokes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, W., Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1993). Toward an empirical verification of the general theory of verbal humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 6(2), 123–136. doi:10.1515/humr.1993.6.2.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J. (2016). Mixed metaphor is a question of deliberateness. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 113–132). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010b). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765–796. doi:10.1515/cogl.2010.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010a). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veale, T. (2013). Humorous similes. Humor, 26(1), 3–22. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley, B. B., & Holloway, R. L. (1997). Rebuttal analogy in political communication: Argument and attack in sound bite. Political Communication, 14(3), 293–305. doi:10.1080/105846097199335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke, J., Heimprecht, C., & Cohen, A. (2012). The geography of foreign news on television: A comparative study of 17 countries. International Communication Gazette, 74(4), 301–322. doi:10.1177/1748048512439812
   Google Scholar
• Yates, D., Moore, D., & McCabe, G. (1999). The Practice of Statistics. W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, W. H., Burgers, C., & Ahrens, K. (2021). Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free Economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997–2017). Lingua, 252, 102955. advance online publication doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar