MSDIP: A Method for Coding Source Domains in Metaphor Analysis

References

• Adams, N. (2015). Scaling up content analysis: Crowd-coding text units. Available at SSRN. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2617222
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, K., & Jiang, M. (2020). Source domain verification using corpus-based tools. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(1), 43–55. doi:10.1080/10926488.2020.1712783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, P. (2020, November 19). Georgia Democrats defend embattled Republican Secretary of State. Fox5 Atlanta. https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/georgia-democrats-defend-embattled-republican-secretary-of-state
   Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Brugman, B. C., Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y., & Steen, G. J. (2016). HIP: A method for linguistic hyperbole identification in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(3), 163–178. doi:10.1080/10926488.2016.1187041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. doi:10.1111/comt.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P. J. (2011). Finding irony: An introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP). Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 186–205. doi:10.1080/10926488.2011.583194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, C. (2020, February 15). Bloomberg is right about the 2008 financial crash. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/15/opinion/bloomberg-redlining.html
   Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2017). Fire metaphors: Discourses of awe and authority. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Coll-Florit, M., & Climent, S. (2019). A new methodology for conceptual metaphor detection and formulation in corpora: A case study on a mental health corpus. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 32, 43–74.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2010). The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810-2009. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2008). Corpus linguistic data and Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. C. Calvacanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic perspective (pp. 149–162). John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/pbns.173.10dei
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2016). From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. In E. Semino & Z. Demjèn Eds., The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (1st, pp. 102–116). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315672953
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, E., Hong, J., & Stickles, E. (2015). MetaNet: Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, 40–49. 10.3115/v1/W15-1405
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, A. G., Reijnierse, W. G., & Venhuizen, G. (2013). One small step for MIP towards automated metaphor identification? Formulating general rules to determine basic meanings in large-scale approaches to metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 77–99. doi:10.1075/msw.3.1.04dor
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, P. (2000). A war of words in the discourse of trade: The rhetorical constitution of metaphor. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronewold, A. (2020, September 21). Can Rochester’s mayor survive the storm? Politico.com. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/24/can-rochesters-mayor-survive-the-storm-421220
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, S. (2019, September 16). Mean, moody, or a mope? If Boris is the Hulk, which Hulk is he? The Guardian International Edition. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/sep/16/boris-the-hulk-could-the-pm-really-be-the-superhero-marvel-mark-ruffalo
   Google Scholar
• Hungerford, E. (1949). Wells Fargo: Advancing the American frontier. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2016). Conceptual metaphor theory. In E. Semino & Z. Demjèn Eds., The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (1st, pp. 13–27). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315672953
   Google Scholar
• Krennmayr, T. (2013). Adding transparency to the identification of cross-domain mappings in real language data. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1), 163–184. doi:10.1075/rcl.11.1.05kre
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2016). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (Third ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). Master Metaphor List (second copy). http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel Entertainment. (n.d.). Hulk (Bruce Banner) in Comics Powers, Villains, Weaknesses: Marvel. https://www.marvel.com/characters/hulk-bruce-banner/in-comics.
   Google Scholar
• Musolff, A. (2020). National conceptualisations of the body politic. Cultural experience and political imagination. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., & Reijnierse, W. G., Eds. 2019. Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world. John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/celcr.22
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary Online. (n.d.). Retrieved November 22, 2020, from http://www.oed.com/
   Google Scholar
• Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi:10.1080/10926480709336752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princeton University. (2010). About WordNet. WordNet. https://wordnet.princeton.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018a). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. doi:10.1007/s41701-017-0026-7
   Google Scholar
• Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018b). On metaphorical views, dynamite, and doodlings: Functions of domain adjectives in metaphorical domain constructions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 431–454. doi:10.1075/rcl.00017.rei
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. (2003). “ARGUMENT is WAR”—Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 125–146. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semino, E., & Demjèn, Z. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A., & Rayson, P. (2017). The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: A mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 7(1), 60–66. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J. (1999). From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen(Eds., Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (Vol. 175, pp. 57–77). John Benjamins Publishing Company doi:10.1075/cilt.175.05ste
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Biernacka, E., Dorst, A. G., Kaal, A., López Rodríguez, C. I., & Pasma, T. (2010). Pragglejaz in practice: Finding metaphorically used words in natural discourse. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron(Eds., Human Cognitive Processing (Vol. 26, pp. 165–184). John Benjamins Publishing Company doi:10.1075/hcp.26.11ste
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/cal.14
   Google Scholar