Why Moral Theories Matter: A Review of Ethics and Adoption Literature

References

• Abramson, M. (1996). Reflections on knowing oneself ethically: Towards a working framework for social work practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 31, 195–202. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angle, S. C., & Tiwald, J. (2017). Neo-confucianism: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babb, L. A. (1999). Ethics in American adoption. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Baden, A.L., & Wiley, M.O. (2007). Counseling adopted persons in adulthood: Integrating practice and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(6), 868–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2006). Ethics and values in social work (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnor, R., & Raley, Y. (2017). Ethical choices: An introduction to moral philosophy with cases (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Callister, L.C. (2011). Ethics of infant relinquishment, cultural considerations, and obstetric conveniences. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 36(3), 172–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devettere, R. J. (2002). Introduction to virtue ethics: Insights of the ancient Greeks. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, R. H., & Goldberg, A. E. (2018). Sexual orientation, gender identity, and adoption law. Family Court Review, 56(3), 374–383. doi:10.1111/fcre.12354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeark, K., Rosenberg, E.B., Bornstein, J., Jozefowicz-Simbeni, D., Linkevich, M., & Lohnes, K. (2005). Gender differences and dynamics shaping the adoption life cycle: Review of the literature and recommendations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(1), 86–101. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Freundlich, M. D. (1998). The case against preadoption genetic testing. Child Welfare, 77(6), 663–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freundlich, M. D. (2000a). Adoption and ethics, volume 1: The role of race, culture, and national origin in adoption. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• Freundlich, M. D. (2000b). Adoption and ethics, volume 2: The market forces in adoption. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• Freundlich, M. D. (2001a). Adoption and ethics, volume 3: The impact of adoption on members of the triad. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• Freundlich, M. D. (2001b). Adoption and ethics, volume 4: Adoption and assisted reproduction. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• *Freundlich, M.D., & Phillips, R. (2000). Ethical issues in adoption. Adoption & Fostering, 24(4), 7–17. doi:10.1177/030857590002400403
   Google Scholar
• *Fronek, P., & Cuthbert, D. (2013). Apologies for forced adoption practices: Implications for contemporary intercountry adoption. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 402–414. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2013.777970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotevant, H., & McDermott, J. (2014). Adoption: Biological and social processes linked to adaptation. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 235–265. doi:10.1146/psych.annualreviews.org
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hall, R. E., & Whipple, E. E. (2017). The complex connection: Ideal light skin as a vehicle of adoption process discrimination vis-à-vis social work practitioners. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 27(7), 669–677. doi:10.1080/10911359.2017.1321511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hayes, P. (2011). The legality and ethics of intercountry adoption under the Hague Convention. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(3), 288–317. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebr016
   Google Scholar
• Hinman, L.M. (2013). Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• *Higgins, M., & Smith, W. (2002). Engaging the commodified face: The use of marketing in the child adoption process. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(2), 179–190. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00274
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. A. (2012). Untangling the Web: The Internet’s transformative impact on adoption: Policy & practice perspective. Evan B. New York, NY: Donaldson Adoption Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R., & Bowles, W. (2012). Social work values, ethics and professional regulation. In K. Lyons, T. Hokenstad, M. Pawar, N. Huegler, and N. Hall (Eds), The sage handbook of international social work (pp. 150–162). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• *Jones, S. (2010). The ethics of intercountry adoption: Why it matters to healthcare providers and bioethicists. Bioethics, 24(7), 358–364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01832.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, B. D., & Boisen, L. S. (2019). The Use-of-selves interdependent model: A pedagogical model for reflective practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(2), 338–350. doi:10.1080/10437797.2018.1513880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, B. D., Kim, J. R., & McRoy, R. (2017). Exploring adoption-specific curricula in undergraduate and graduate degree programs. Adoption Quarterly, 20(3), 252–265. doi:10.1080/10926755.2017.1349698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Leighton, K. J. (2014). Accepting adoption’s uncertainty: The limited ethics of pre-adoption testing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 11(2), 245–260. doi:10.1007/s11673-014-9519-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lo, A. Y. H., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2019). Ethical considerations in adoption research: Navigating confidentiality and privacy across the adoption kinship network. Adoption Quarterly, 22(1), 75–93. doi:10.1080/10926755.2018.1488328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Brawley, E., & Zorita, P. (2017). Contemporary social work practice and education: A call for the reexamination of virtue ethics. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 30(1), 109–118. doi:10.5209/CUTS.49446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattison, M. (2000). Ethical decision making: The person in the process. Social Work, 45(3), 201–212. doi:10.1093/sw/45.3.201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2017). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Osmo, R., & Landau, R. (2006). The role of ethical theories in decision making by social workers. Social Work Education, 25(8), 863–876. doi:10.1080/0261547
   Google Scholar
• Osmo, R., & Landau, R. (2003). Religious and secular beliefs in social work: A survey of Israeli social worker professionals. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 84(3), 359–366. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios, J., Rolock, N., Selwyn, J., & Barbosa-Ducharne, M. (2019). Adoption breakdown: Concept, research, and implications. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 130–142. doi:10.1177/1049731518783852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2015). Elements of moral philosophy (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (1983). The concept of paternalism in social work. Social Service Review, 57(2), 254–271. doi:10.1086/644516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (1998). The evolution of social work ethics. Social Work, 43(6), 488–500.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (2018a). Social work values and ethics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (2018b). Ethical standards for social workers’ use of technology: Emerging consensus. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 15(2), 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• *Reamer, F. G., & Siegel, D. H. (2007). Ethical issues in open adoption: Implications for practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(1), 11–18. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rios-Kahn, R. (1998). Intercountry adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 1(4), 3–32. doi:10.1300/J145v01n04_02
   Google Scholar
• *Roby, J. L., & Matsumura, S. (2002). If I give you my child, aren’t we family?. Adoption Quarterly, 5(4), 7–31. doi:10.1300/J145v05n04_02
   Google Scholar
• *Roby, J. L., & White, H. (2010). Adoption activities on the Internet: A call for regulation. Social Work, 55(3), 203–212. doi:10.1093/sw/55.3.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schweitzer, H., & Pollack, D. (2006). Ethical and legal dilemmas in adoption social work. Family Court Review, 44(2), 258–212. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00084.x
   Google Scholar
• *Shapiro, J. (2012). Ethically informed practice with families formed via international adoption: Linking care ethics with narrative approaches to social welfare practice. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(4), 333–350. doi:10/1080/17496535.2011.591812
   Google Scholar
• Shun, K., & Wong, D. B. (2004). Confucian ethics: A comparative study of self, autonomy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. H. (1998). Adoption. In R. Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied ethics (Vol. 1, pp. 29–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Smolin, D. M. (2013). The corrupting influence of the United States on a vulnerable intercountry adoption system: A guide for stakeholders, Hague and non-Hague nations, NGOs, and concerned parties. Utah Law Review, 4(15), 81–151.
   Google Scholar
• *Stuy, B. (2013). Open secret: Cash and coercion in China’s international adoption program. Cumberland Law Review, 44, 355–422.
   Google Scholar
• *Sullivan, R., & Harrington, M. (2009). The politics and ethics of same-sex adoption. Journal of Glbt Family Studies, 5(3), 235–246. doi:10.1080/15504280903035662
   Google Scholar
• *Tefre, O.S. (2015). The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, W. M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Wall, S. (2012). Ethics and the socio-political context of international adoption: Speaking from the eye of the storm. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(4), 318–332. doi:10.1080/17496535.2011.567256
   Google Scholar
• *Watson, L.D., & Cobb, N. H. (2012). Ethical issues in the use of putative father registries in infant adoption: Implications for administrators and practitioners. Adoption Quarterly, 15(3), 206–219. doi:10.1080/109276755.2012.699912
   Google Scholar
• Williams-Mbengue, N. (2016). Adult adoptee access to original birth certificates. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/adult-adoptee-access-to-original-birth-certificates.aspx
   Google Scholar