Ethical Lawyering in Adoption: Centering the Child in Adoption Law

References

• American Bar Association. (2012). Model Rules of Professional Conduct. ABA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appell, A. R. (2010). Controlling for kin: Ghosts in the postmodern family. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 25(1), 73–136.
   Google Scholar
• Baden, A. (2016). “Do you know your real parents?” and other adoption microaggressions. Adoption Quarterly, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2015.1026012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholet, E. (1991). Where do black children belong? The politics of race matching in adoption. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 139(5), 1163–1256. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholet, E. (1995). International adoption: propriety, prospects and pragmatics. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 13, 181–210.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. J., Cohen, E. J., & Gunnarsson, H. W. (2015). Annotated Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Center for Professional Responsibility, American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M. (1993). Adoptive parents' perceptions of, and comfort with, open adoption. Child Welfare. 72, 231–53.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, E. (2005). Cautionary tales of adoption: Addressing the litigation crisis at the moment of adoption. Whittier Journal of Child & Family Advocacy, 4(2), 187–232.
   Google Scholar
• Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors and Practitioners of Professional Responsibility and Family Law, In re Krigel, 480 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. 2016). (No. SC95098).
   Google Scholar
• Brodzinsky, D., Singer, L. M., & Braff, A. (1984). Children’s understanding of adoption. Child Development, 55(3), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodzinsky, D. (1987). Adjustment to adoption: A psychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 7(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(87)90003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodzinsky, D. (1990). A stress and coping model of adoption adjustment. In D. Brodzinsky & M. D. Schecter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption (pp. 3–24). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodzinsky, D. (2006). Family structural openness and communication openness as predictors in the adjustment of adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 9(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v09n04_01
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, G. M., & Norfleet, M. A. (1979). Women who place their infants up for adoption: A pilot study. Patient Counseling & Health Education, 1(4), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(79)80006-3
   Google Scholar
• Carp, E. W. (1998). Family matters: Secrecy and disclosure in the history of adoption. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, C. L., McRoy, R. G., Grotevant, H., & Bryant, C. (1997). Grief resolution of birthmothers in confidential, time-limited mediated, ongoing mediated, and fully disclosed ddoptions. Adoption Quarterly, 1(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v01n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Clapton, G. (2003). Birth Fathers and their adoption experiences. Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Clapton, G. (2007). The experiences and needs of birth fathers in adoption: What we know now and some practice implications. Practice: Social Work in Action, 19(1), 61–71., https://doi.org/10.1080/09503150701220515
   Google Scholar
• Claridge, A. M. (2014). Supporting birth parents in adoption: A couple treatment approach. Adoption Quarterly, 17(2), 112–133.
   Google Scholar
• Daicoff, S. (2008). Lawyer, be thyself: An empirical investigation of the relationship between the ethic of care, the feeling of decisionmaking preference, and lawyer wellbeing. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 16(1), 87–140.
   Google Scholar
• Deykin, E. Y., Patti, P., & Ryan, J. (1988). Fathers of adopted children: A study of the impact of child surrender on birthfathers. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1988.tb01585.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J. G. (2008). First parents: Reconceptualizing newborn adoption. Capital University Law Review, 37(2), 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmann, S. (1993). The ethic of care as an ethic for lawyers. Georgetown Law Journal, 81(7), 2665–2726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freundlich, M. (2000). The market forces in adoption: Adoption and ethics (Vol. 2). Child Welfare League of America.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, X., Natsuaki, M. N., Martin, D. M., Leve, L. D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D. S., Villareal, G., Scaramella, L., Reid, J. B., & Reiss, D. (2008). Bridging the divide: Openness in adoption and postadoption psychosocial adjustment among birth and adoptive parents. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 22(4), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E., & Pollack, D. (2008). Trade-offs in formulating a consistent national policy on adoption. Family Court Review, 46(2), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00206.x
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins DeBose, C. (2015). Mastering adoption law and policy. Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger, J. H. (2015). Adoption law and practice (Vol. 1). Newark, N.J.: Matthew Bender. https://www.lexisnexis.com
   Google Scholar
• Krigel. (2016). In re Krigel, 480 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Krigel Brief. (2016). Brief for Informant, In re Krigel, 480 S.W.3d 294 (Mo. 2016) (No. SC95098).
   Google Scholar
• Janoff, S. (1991). The influence of legal education on moral reasoning. Minnesota Law Review, 76(2), 193–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., & Cahn, K. (1992). Improving child welfare practice through improvements in attorney-social worker relationships. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 54(1), 229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, S. (2004). The impact of early institutionalization on child and family outcomes. Adoption Quarterly, 7(3), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v07n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Juffer, F. (2006). Children’s awareness of adoption and their problem behavior in families with 7-year-old internationally adopted children. Adoption Quarterly, 9(2–3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v09n02_01
   Google Scholar
• Kalmuss, D., Namerow, P. B., & Bauer, U. (1992). Short-term consequences of parenting versus adoption among young unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/353277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, K. (2018, February 3). Kansas City attorney successfully completes probation following bungled 2010 adoption case. Retrieved February 3, 2020, from https://stlrecord.com/stories/511325785-kansas-city-attorney-successfully-completes-probation-following-bungled-2010-adoption-case
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, K. R. (2011). Engaged client-centered representation of the moral foundations of the lawyer-client relationship. Hofstra Law Review, 39(3), 577–594.
   Google Scholar
• Lande, J. (2003). Possibilities for collaborative law: Ethics and practice of lawyer disqualification and process control in new model of lawyering. Ohio State Law Journal, 64(5), 1315–1384.
   Google Scholar
• Luban, D., & Wendel, W. B. (2017). Philosophical legal ethics: An affectionate history. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30(3), 337–365.
   Google Scholar
• Mainemer, H., Gilman, L., & Ames, E. (1998). Parenting stress in families adopting children from Romanian orphanages. Journal of Family Issues, 19(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251398019002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinn, M. F. (2007). Developmental challenges for adoptees across the life cycle. In R. Javier, A. Baden, F. A. Biafora, & A. Camacho-Gingerich (Eds.), Handbook of adoption: Implications for researchers, practitioners, and families (pp. 61–76). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone, K., Santos, L., Kazama, L., Fong, R., Mueller, C. (2002) Psychological Stress in Adoptive Parents of Special-Needs Children. Child Welfare, 81(2), 151–171.
   Google Scholar
• McRoy, R. G., Grotevant, H., Ayers-Lopez, S., & Henney, S. M. (2007). Open adoptions: Longitudinal outcomes for the adoption triad. In R. Javier, A. Baden, F. A. Biafora, & A. Camacho-Gingerich (Eds.), Handbook of adoption: Implications for researchers, practitioners, and families (pp. 175–189). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Menkel-Meadow, C. (2017). The evolving complexity of dispute resolution ethics. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30(3), 389–415.
   Google Scholar
• Mo. Rev. Stat. § 192.016. (2005).
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of ethics of the national association of social workers. NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios, J., & Sanchez-Sandoval, Y. (2006). Stress in parents of adopted children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(6), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406071492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, P. C. (1991). The particular challenges of being adopted. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 61(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377319109516694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, D., & Debele, G. (2017). Shifting ethical and social conundrums and “stunningly anachronistic” laws: What lawyers in adoption and assisted reproduction may want to consider. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 30(1), 127–176.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, D. (1981). Why the ABA bothers: A functional perspective on professional codes. Texas Law Review, 59(4), 689–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, J. S. (2000). Constructing families in democracy: Courts, legislatures and second-parent adoption. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 75(3), 933–950.
   Google Scholar
• Schneyer, T. (2008). The organized bar and the collaborative law movement: Study in professional change. Arizona Law Review, 50(1), 289–336.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, H., & Pollack, D. (2006). Ethical and legal dilemmas in adoption social work. Family Court Review, 44(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00084.x
   Google Scholar
• Seymore, M. L. (2015). Openness in international adoption. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 46(3), 163–226.
   Google Scholar
• Seymore, M. L. (2017). Grasping fatherhood in abortion and adoption. Hastings Law Journal, 68(4), 817–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymore, M. L. (2019). Adopting civil damages: Wrongful family separation in adoption. Washington and Lee Law Review, 76(2), 895–962.
   Google Scholar
• Seymore, M. L. (2020). Ethical blind spots in adoption lawyering. University of Richmond Law Review, 54(2), 461–526.
   Google Scholar
• Soares, J., Ralha, S., Barbosa-Ducharne, M., Palacios, J. (2019). Adoption-Related Gains, Losses and Difficulties: The Adopted Child's Perspective. Child Adolescent Social Work Journal 36, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-018-0582-0
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, M. (2000). Adoption with Contact: A Study of Adoptive Parents and the Impact of Continuing Contact with Families of Origin. Adoption & Fostering, 24(2), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590002400205
   Google Scholar
• Tesler, P. H. (1999). Collaborative law: A new paradigm for divorce lawyers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 967–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.4.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserstrom, R. (1975). Lawyers as professionals: Some moral issues. Human Rights, 5(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J. (1997). And never the twain shall meet: The best interests of children and the adversary system. University of Miami Law Review, 52(1), 79–176.
   Google Scholar
• Whitesel, A. L. (2008). Post adoption adjustment of birth fathers: The effects of relationships with birth mothers and family [ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (3330769)].(Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Washington, D.C.: Howard University
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki, M. (1993). Psychological adjustment of adoptees: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22(4), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2204_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, M., & Baden, A. (2005). Birth parents in adoption: Research, practice, and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004265961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, R., & Van Keppel, M. (1984). Relinquishing mothers in adoption: Their long-term adjustment. Monograph #3. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar