Factors Mediating and Moderating the Relationship between Abuse and Commitment

REFERENCES

• Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 163–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias, I., & Pape, K. T. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners. Violence Victims, 14, 55–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett, O. W. (2000). Why battered women do not leave: Part 1. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1, 343–372.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, J. S. (2002). Implicit self-theories of shyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1009–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiding, M. J., Black, M. C., & Ryan, G. W. (2008). Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 34, 112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaldi, D. M., & Crosby, L. (1997). Observed and reported psychological and physical aggression in young, at-risk couples. Social Development, 6, 184–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 23, 260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follingstad, D. R., Rogers, M. J., & Duvall, J. L. (2012). Factors predicting relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment when women report high prevalence of psychological abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 257–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., & Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kaura, S. A., & Lohman, B. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 376–381.
   Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., Nanayakkara, A., Vietor, N. A., Neighbors, C., & Patrick, H. (2001). Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 808–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., & Neighbors, C. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 617–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods of test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne, S., Badr, H., Zaider, T., Nelson, C., & Kissane, D. (2010). Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 4, 74–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niolon, P. H., Rollins, C. M., Glass, N., Billhardt, K., Connor-Smith, J., & Baker, C. (2009). An innovative approach to serving the needs of IPV survivors: Descriptions of a CDC-funded study examining the volunteers of American Home Free Rent Assistance Program. Journal of Women’s Health, 18, 775–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. D., Resick, P. A., & Nishith, P. (2004). An exploration of comorbid depression among female victims of intimate partner violence with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 15, 315–320.
   Google Scholar
• Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. K. (2006). Using the investment model to understand battered women’s commitment to an abusive relationship. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortt, J. W., Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Laurent, H. K. (2010). The effects of intimate partner violence on relationship satisfaction over time for young at-risk couples: The moderating role of observed negative and positive affect. Partner Abuse, 1, 131–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spanier, G. D. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S. B., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar