Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering
Volume 49, 2014 - Issue 10
Submit an article Journal homepage
203
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Comparison of permeable reactive barrier, funnel and gate, nonpumped wells, and low-capacity wells for groundwater remediation

Paul F. HudakDepartment of Geography and Environmental Science Program, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USACorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 1171-1175 | Received 22 Nov 2013, Published online: 20 May 2014

References

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Economic Analysis of the Implementation of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Remediation of Contaminated Ground Water. Author: Washington, DC, 2002.
  • Ludwig, R.D.; McGregor, R.G.; Blowes, D.W.; Benner, S.G.; Mountjoy, K. A permeable reactive barrier for treatment of heavy metals. Ground Water 2002, 40(1), 59–66.
  • Gilbert, O.; Pablo, J.; Cortina, J.-L.; Ayora, C. In situ removal of arsenic from groundwater by using permeable reactive barriers of organic matter/limestone/zero-valent iron mixtures. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32(4), 373–378.
  • Robertson, W.D.; Blowes, D.W.; Cherry, J.A. Long-term performance of in situ reactive barriers for nitrate remediation. Ground Water 2000, 38(5), 689–695.
  • Guerin, T.F.; Horner, S.; McGovern, T.; Davey, B. An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater. Water Res. 2002, 36(1), 15–24.
  • Lai, K.C.K.; Lo, I.M.C.; Birkelund, V.; Kjeldsen, P. Field monitoring of a permeable reactive barrier for removal of chlorinated organics. J. Environ. Eng. 2006, 132(2), 199–210.
  • Blowes, D.W.; Ptacek, C.J.; Benner, S.G.; McRae, C.W.T.; Puls, R.W. Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2000, 45(1), 123–137.
  • Gupta, N.; Fox, T.C. Hydrogeologic modeling for permeable reactive barriers. J. Hazard. Mater. 1999, 68(1), 19–39.
  • Elder, C.R.; Benson, C.H.; Eykholt, G.R. Effects of heterogeneity on influent and effluent concentration from horizontal permeable reactive barriers. Water Resour. Res. 2002, 38(8), 1–19.
  • Painter, B.D.M. Reactive barriers: Hydraulic performance and design enhancements. Ground Water 2004, 42(4), 609–619.
  • Hemsi, P.S.; Shackelford, C.D. An evaluation of the influence of aquifer heterogeneity on permeable reactive barrier design. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(3), 1–13.
  • Hudak, P.F. Mass transport in groundwater near hanging-wall interceptors. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2007, 42(3), 317–321.
  • Striegel, J.; Sanders, D.A.; Veenstra, J.N. Treatment of contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive barriers. Environ. Geosci. 2001, 8(4), 258–265.
  • Scherer, M.M.; Richter, S.; Valentine, R.L.; Alvarez, P.J. Chemistry and microbiology of permeable reactive barriers for in situ groundwater clean up. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 30(3), 363–411.
  • Starr, R.C.; Cherry, J.A. In situ remediation of contaminated ground water: The funnel-and-gate system. Ground Water 1994, 32(3), 465–476.
  • Sedivy, R.A.; Shafer, J.M.; Bilbrey, L.C. Design screening tools for passive funnel and gate systems. Ground Water Monitor. Remed. 1999, 19(4), 125–133.
  • Bilbrey, L.C.; Shafer, J.M. Funnel-and-gate performance in a moderately heterogeneous flow domain. Ground Water Monitor. Remed. 2001, 21(3), 144–151.
  • Cirpka, O.A.; Burger, C.M.; Nowak, W.; Finkel, M. Uncertainty and data worth analysis for the hydraulic design of funnel-and-gate systems in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40(11), 1–12.
  • Klausen, J.; Ranke, J.; Schwarzenbach, R.P. Influence of solution and column aging on the reduction of nitroaromatic compounds by zero-valent iron. Chemosphere 2001, 44(4), 511–517.
  • US Geological Survey (USGS). Deep aquifer remediation tools (DARTs): A new technology for ground-water remediation. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 156-99; Author: Reston, VA, 1999.
  • Hudak, P.F. Internal versus external configurations of passive wells with filter cartridges for cleaning contaminated groundwater. Remediation 2009, 20(1), 133–141.
  • Hudak, P.F. Evaluation of reactive well networks for remediating heterogeneous aquifers. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2008, 43, 731–737.
  • Zheng, C.; Wang, P.P. MT3DMS, a modular three-dimensional multi-species transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user's guide. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Contract Report SERDP-99-1; US Army Corps of Engineers: Vicksburg, MS, 1999.
  • Newell, C.J.; Hopkins, L.P.; Bedient, P.B. Hydrogeologic Database for Ground Water Modeling. American Petroleum Institute: Washington, DC, 1989.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.