Sensitivity analyses and simulations of a full-scale experimental membrane bioreactor system using the activated sludge model No. 3 (ASM3)

References

• McKinney, R.E. Mathematics of Complete-Mixing Activated Sludge. J. Sanitary Engng. Div. ASCE. 1962, 88, 87–113.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer, J.; Seco, A.; Serralta, J.; Ribes, J.; Manga, J.; Asensi, E.; Morenilla, J.J.; Llavador, F. DESASS: A software tool for designing, simulating and optimising WWTPs. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2008, 23, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenu, A.; Guglielmi, G.; Jimenez, J.; Spèrandio, M.; Saroj, D.; Lesjean, B.; Brepols, C.; Thoeye, C.; Nopens, I. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modeling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: A critical review with special regard to MBR specifities. Water Res. 2010, 44, 4272–4294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppsson, U. Modelling aspects of wastewater treatment processes. Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Henze, M.; Grady, C.P.L. Jr.; Gujer, W.; Marais, G.v.R.; Matsuo, T. Activated Sludge Model No. 1. Scientific and Technical Report No. 1, International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control (IAWPRC): London, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Sperandio, M.; Espinosa, M.C. Modelling an aerobic submerged membrana bioreactor with ASM models on a large range of sludge retention time. Desalination 2008, 231, 82–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galleguillos, M.; Keffala, C.; Vasel, J.L. Simulation of a membrane bioreactor pilot treating old landfill leachates with activated sludge model No. 1 and No. 3. Environ. Technol. 2011, 32(16), 1955–1965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsbeek, J.J.W.; Kruit, J.; Roeleveld, P.J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45(6), 127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naessens, W.; Maere, T.; Nopens, I. Critical review of membrane bioreactor models – Part 1: Biokinetic and filtration models. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122, 95–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckenfelder, W.W.; Grau, P. Activated sludge process design and control: theory and practice. Technomic Publishing Company: Lancaster, PA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Tian, Y.; Cao, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of an extended ASM3-SMP model describing membrane bioreactor operation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389, 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoso-Bravo, A.; Mailier, J.; Ruiz-Filippi, G.; Wouwer, A.V. Identification in an anaerobic batch system: global sensitivity analysis, multi-start strategy and optimization criterion selection. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocaoglu, S.M.; Atasoy, E.; Baban, A.; Orhon, D. Modeling biodegradation characteristics of grey water in membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429, 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Liwarska-Bizukojc, E.; Biernacki, R. Identification of the most sensitive parameters in the activated sludge model implemented in BioWin software. Bioresource Technol. 2010, 101, 7278–7285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhooren, H.; Meirlaen, J.; Amerlinck, Y.; Claeys, F.; Vangheluwe, H.; Vanrolleghem, P.A. WEST: Modelling biological wastewater treatment. J. Hydroinform. 2003, 5(1), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J.; Premier, C.; Dinsdale, R.; Guwy, A.J. An implementation framework for wastewater treatment models requiring a minimum programming expertise. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(2), 367–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, E. Sensitivity analysis in the context of incertainty analysis for computationally intensive models. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1999, 117, 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanrolleghem, P.A.; Insel, G.; Petersen, B.; Sin, G.; De Pauw, D.; Nopens, I.; Dovermann, H.; Weijers, S.; Gernaey, K. A comprehensive model calibration procedure for activated sludge models. Water Environment Federation: Los Angeles CA, USA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gujer, W.; Henze, M.; Mino, T.; Van Loosdrecht, M. Activated Sludge Model No. 3. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39(1), 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melcer, H.; Dold, P.L.; Jones, R.M.; Bye, C.M.; Takacs, I.; Stensel, H.D.; Wilson, A.W.; Sun, P.; Bury, S. Methods for wastewater characterization in activated sludge modeling. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), Alexandria, VA, USA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.S.; Kim, M.H.; Yoo, C.K. A new statistical framework for parameter subset selection and optimal parameter estimation in the activated sludge model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183(1–3), 441–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, T.; Liu, X.; Kennedy, M.D.; Schippers, J.C.; Vanrolleghem, P.A. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No.1. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52(10–11), 359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liwarska-Bizukojc, E.; Olejnik, D.; Biernacki, R.; Ledakowicz, S. Calibration of a complex activated sludge model for the full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 34, 659–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalmau, M.; Rodriguez-Roda, I.; Ayesa, E.; Odriozola, J.; Sancho, L.; Comas, J. Development of a decision tree for the integrated operation of nutrient removal MBRs based on simulation studies and expert knowledge. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 217, 174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arévalo, J.; Ruiz, L.M.; Pérez, J.; Gómez, M.A. Effects of temperature on membrane bioreactor performance working with high hydraulic and sludge retention time. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 88, 42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, L.; Jun, L.; Yang, Q.; Wang, S.; Ma, B.; Peng, Y. Biomass characteristics and simultaneous nitrification–denitrification under long sludge retention time in an integrated reactor treating rural domestic sewage. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 119, 277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar