Marcellus and mercury: Assessing potential impacts of unconventional natural gas extraction on aquatic ecosystems in northwestern Pennsylvania

References

• Chen, C.Y.; Stemberger, R.S.; Kamman N.C.; Mayes, B.M; Folt, C.L. Patterns of Hg bioaccumulation and transfer in aquatic food webs across multi-lake studies in the northeast US. Ecotoxicology 2005, 14, 135–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, W.F.; Lamborg, C.H.; Hammerschmidt, C.R. Marine biogeochemical cycling of mercury. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 641–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller, M.H.; Jagoe, C.H.; Bennett, H.; Brant, H.A.; Bowers, J.A. Influence of methylmercury from tributary streams on mercury levels in Savannah River Asiatic clams. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 325, 209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J.E.; Hines, M.E.; Biester, H. Mercury methylation influenced by areas of past mercury mining in the Terlingua district, Southwest Texas, USA. Appl. Geochem. 2006, 21(11), 1940–1954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustin, M.S.; Lindberg S.E.; Weisberg, P.J. An update on the natural sources and sinks of atmospheric mercury. Appl. Geochem. 2008, 23, 482–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacyna, E.G.; Pacyna, J.M.; Sundseth, K.; Munthe, J.; Kindborn, K.; Wilson, S.; Steenhuisen, F.; Maxson, P. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44(20), 2487–2499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seigneur, C.; Jayaraghavan, K.; Lohman, K.; Karamchandani, P.; Scott, C. Globalsource attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 555–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty, S.K.; Lin, C.J.; Streets, D.G.; Jang, C. Model estimate of mercury emission from natural sources in East Asia. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 8674–8685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Electronic report on the environment for 2008; mercury indicator. NTIS PB2008-112484 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2009/600/R-07/045F, 2009. Available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/eroe/index.cfm?fuseaction=detail.viewInd&lv=list.listByAlpha&r=188199&subtop=341. (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S.; Bullock, O.R.; Ebinghaus, R.; Engstrom, D.; Feng, X.; Fitzgerald, W.; Pirrone, N.; Prestbo, E.; Seigneur, C. A synthesis of progress and uncertainties in attributing the sources of mercury in deposition. Ambio 2007, 36, 19–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason R.P.; Abbott, M.L.; Bodaly, R.A.; Bullock, O.R.; Evers, D.; Lindberg, S.E.; Murray, M.; Swain, E.B. Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 39(1), 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Proection Agency (USEPA). National Listing of Fish and Wildlife Advisories (NLFWA). Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2001. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ost/fish/listing.html (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Proection Agency (USEPA). National listing of fish advisories: technical fact sheet; 2008 biennial national listing. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, EPA-823-F-09-007, 2009. Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fishshellfish/fishadvisories/tech2008.cfm (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Great Lakes water quality initiative technical support document for wildlife criteria: EPA 820-B95-009 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Office of Water: Washington, DC, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Drohan, P.J.; Brittingham, M.; Bishop, J.; Yoder, K. Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: A potential outcome for the northcentral Appalachians. Environ. Manage. 2012, 49(5), 1061–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US DOE. Modern shale gas development in the United States: A primer. Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, United States Department of Energy; Oklahoma City, OK, 2009; 96 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Vidic, R.D.; Brantley, S.L.; Vandenbossche, J.M.; Yoxtheimer, D.; Abad, J D. Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality. Science 2013, 340(6134), 1235009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharaka, Y.K.; Thordsen, J.J.; Conaway, C.H.; Thomas R.B. The energy-water nexus: potential groundwater-quality degredation associated with production of shale gas. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 2013, 7, 417–422.  
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, Z. A study of natural gas extraction in Marcellus Shale. Master's Thesis, submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011, 73 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-volume Hydraulic Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-permeability Gas Reservoirs. Revised Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on the Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Division of Mineral Resources: Albany, NY, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Struchtemeyer, C.G.; Elshahed, M.S. Bacterial communities associated with hydraulic fracturing fluids in thermogenic natural gas wells in North Central Texas, USA. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 81, 13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali Mohan, A.; Hartsock, A.; Hammack, R.W.; Vidic, R.D.; Gregory, K.B. Microbial communities in flowback water impoundments from hydraulic fracturing for recovery of shale gas. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 86, 576–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahm, B.; Bates, J.T.; Bertoia, L.R.; Galford, A.E.; Yoxtheimer, D.A.; Riha, S.J. Wastewater management and Marcellus shale gas development: trends, drivers, and planning implications. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 120, 105–113.  
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vengosh, A.; Warner, N.; Jackson, R.; Darrah, T. The effects of shale gas exploration and hydraulic fracturing on the quality of water resources in the United States. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 2013, 7, 863–866.
   Google Scholar
• Kargbo, D.; Wilhelm, R.; Campbell, D. Natural gas plays in the Marcellus shale: challenges and potential opportunities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 5679–5684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Challenges and strategies of shale gas development. Master's Thesis, University of Texas at Austin: Austin, TX, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, D. Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: the case of Texas. Energy Pol. 2011 39, 2974–2981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, T.; Watson, R.; Considine, N.; Martin, J. Environmental impacts during Marcellus Shale gas drilling: causes, impacts, and remedies, Shale Resources and Society Institute Report 2012-1, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, N.; Jackson, R.; Darrah, T.; Osborn, S.; Down, A.; Zhao, K.; White, A.; Vengosh, A. Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109(30), 11961–11966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peduzzi, P.; Ruth, H.R.R. Gas fracking: can we safely squeeze the rocks? Environ. Develop. 2013, 6, 86–99.
   Google Scholar
• New York City Department of Environmental Protection. Impact assessment of natural gas production in the New York City water supply watershed. City of New York: New York, NY, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rahm, B.; Riha, S. Toward strategic management of shale gas development: Regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environ. Sci. Poll. 2012, 17, 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, M. Support to the identification of potential risks for the environment and human health arising from hydrocarbons operations involving hydraulic fracturing in Europe. AEA 2012, 17c, 1–210.
   Google Scholar
• Leff, E. Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement on the Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program, Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume, Hydraulic Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation: New York, NY, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, D.M.; Nislow, K.H.; Folt, C.L. Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2010, 1195, 62–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickhardt, P.C.; Fisher, N.S. Accumulation of inorganic and methylmercury by freshwater phytoplankton in two contrasting water bodies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41(1), 125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. 2010. Pennsylvania energy impacts assessment. The Nature Conservancy, Harrisburg, PA. Available at http://www.marcellus.psu.edu/resources/PDFs/tncenergy.pdf (accessed Jan 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ladlee, J.; Jacquet, J. The implications of multi-well pads in the Marcellus Shale. Community and Regional Development Institute at Cornell (CaRDI) Research and Policy Brief Series, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, 2011, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Schelker, J.; Eklöf, K.; Bishop, K.; Laudon, H. Effects of forestry operations on dissolved organic carbon concentrations and export in boreal first-order streams. J. Geophys. Res. 2012, 117 (G1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardine, T.; Kidd, K.; Rasmussen, J. Aquatic and terrestrial organic matter in the diet of stream consumers: implications for mercury bioaccumulation. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22(3), 843–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryce, S.A.; Lomnicky, G.A.; Kaufmann, P.R. Protecting sediment-sensitive aquatic species in mountain streams through the application of biologically based streambed sediment criteria. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 2010, 29(2), 657–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudel, M.; Rasmussen, J.B. Bioenergetics and mercury dynamics in fish: a modelling perspective. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2006, 63, 1890–1902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasar, L.C.; Scudder, B.C.; Stewart, A.R.; Bell, A.H.; Aiken, G.R. Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 3. Trophic dynamics and methylmercury bioaccumulation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2733–2739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabana, G.; Rasmussen, J.B. Modeling food-chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes. Nature 1994, 372, 255–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). Oil and Gas Reports. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Harrisburg, PA, 2013. Available at http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/marcellusshale/20296 (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Penn State Marcellus Center for Outreach and Development. Map of Issued Permits for Unconventional Wells. Penn State University: University Park, PA, 2012. Available at http://www.marcellus.psu.edu/resources/maps.php (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Olmstead, S.; Muehlenbachs, L.; Shih, J.; Chu, Z.; Krupnick, A. Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 110(13), 4962–4967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entrekin, S.; Evans-White, M.; Johnson, B.; Hagenbuch, E. Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9(9), 503–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP). Permits Issued Detail Report. Harrisburg, PA, 2012. http://www.depreportingservices.state.pa.us/ReportServer/Pages/ReportViewer.aspx?/Oil_Gas/Permits_Issued_Detail (accessed July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP). SPUD Data Report. PA DEP: Harrisburg, PA, 2012. http://www.depreportingservices.state.pa.us/ReportServer/Pages/ReportViewer.aspx?/Oil_Gas/Spud_External_Data (accessed July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ground Water Protection Council (GWPC), & Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC). FracFocus: Chemical Disclosure Registry. FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry, 2010. Available at http://www.fracfocusdata.org/DisclosureSearch/ (accessed Jul 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M.L.; DeWild, J.F. Techniques for the collection and species-specific analysis of low levels of mercury in water, sediment, and biota: U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 99–4018-B, 11 pp, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• John, F.B. Collection water-quality samples for dissolved metals-in-water. USA Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2000. http://www.epa.gov/region6/qa/qadevtools/mod5_sops/surface_water_sampling/low_level_metals/r6wtr-sampling-metals.pdf (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M.E.; Brigham, M.E. Low-level mercury. In Processing of Water Samples, F. D. Wilde, D.B. Radtke, J. Gibs, R. T. Iwatsubo, Eds. US Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 9, Chapter A5, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hazen, T.C.; Dubinsky, E.A.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Andersen, G.L.; Piceno, Y.M.; Singh, N.; Jansson, J.K.; Probst, A.; Borglin, S.E.; Fortney, J.L.; Stringfellow, W.T.; Bill, M.; Conrad, M.E.; Tom, L.M.; Chavarria, K.L.; Alusi, T.R.; Lamendella, R.; Joyner, D.C.; Spier, C.; Baelum, J.; Auer, M.; Zemla, M.L.; Chakraborty, R.; Sonnenthal, E.L.; D’haeseleer, P.; Holman, H.N.; Osman, S., Lu’ Z., Van Nostrand, J.D.; Deng, Y.; Zhou, J.; Mason, O.U. Deep-Sea oil plume enriches indigenous oil-degrading bacteria. Science 2010, 330, 204–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, D.V.; Lazorchak, J.M.; Klemm, D.J. Field operations and methods for wadeable streams; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Corvallis, OR, 2003; 203–232.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M.T.; Gerritsen, J.; Snyder, B.D.; Stribling, J.B. Chapter 8: Fish Protocol. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Water: Washington, DC, 1999; 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M.T.; Gerritsen, J.; Snyder, B.D.; Stribling, J.B. Chapter 7 (part A): Benthic Macroinvertebrate Protocols. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Water: Washington, DC, 1999; 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, M.A.; Brigham, M.E.; Marvin-DiPasquale, M. Procedures for collecting and processing streambed sediment and pore water for analysis of mercury as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program; Open-File Report 2008-1279, U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J.A.; Aboal, J.R.; Carballeira, A. Identification of pollution sources by means of moss bags. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2004, 59, 76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. Chapter Three: Inorganic Analytes. SW-846, Revision 4; US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2007; 1–28. Available at (http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/chap3.pdf" (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cesa, M.; Campisi, B.; Bizzotto, A.; Ferraro, C.; Fumagalli, F.; Nimis, P.L. A Factor Influence study of trace element bioaccumulation in moss bags. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 55, 386–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brightbill, R.A.; Murray, K.R.; Bilger, M.D.; Byrnes, J.D. Total mercury and methylmercury in fish fillets, water, and bed sediments from selected streams in the Delaware River Basin, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, 1998-2001. Water Resources Investigation Report 03-4183, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. Methods for Collection, Storage and Manipulation of Sediments for Chemical and Toxicological Analyses: Technical Manual. US EPA 823-B-01-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2001; 1–208.
   Google Scholar
• Scudder, B.C.; Chasar, L.C.; Wentz, D.A.; Bauch, N.J.; Brigham, M.E.; Moran, P.W.; Krabbenhoft, D.P. Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998–2005. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5109, Reston, VA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, R.W., Cummins, K.W., Berg, M.B., Eds. An Introduction to Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th ed.; Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company: Dubuque, IA 2008; 1158 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, T. Key to the crayfishes of Pennsylvania. The Carnegie Museum of Natural History: Pittsburgh, PA. Available at http://iz.carnegiemnh.org/crayfish/key_to_pa_crayfishes.html (accessed Dec 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Caporaso, G.J.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Gonzalez Peña, A.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; Huttley, G.A.; Kelley, S.T.; Knights, D.; Koenig, J.E.; Ley, R.E.; Lozupone, C.A.; McDonald, D.; Muegge, B.D.; Pirrung, M.; Reeder, J.; Sevinsky, J.R.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Walters, W.A.; Widmann, J.; Yatsunenko, T.; Zaneveld, J.; Knight, R. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Meth. 2010, 7, 335–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. CUPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Meth. 2013, 10, 996–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trexler, R.; Solomon, C.; McClure, E.; Brislawn, C.; Peterson, M.; Keddache, M.; Mason, O.; Hazen, T.; Hazen, T.; Grant, C.; Lamendella, R. The response of freshwater aquatic microbial communities to Marcellus Shale natural gas extraction. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00522.
   Google Scholar
• Cenci, R.M. The use of aquatic moss (Fontinalis antipyretica) as monitor of contamination in standing and running waters: limits and advantages. Scientific and legal aspects of biological monitoring in freshwater J. Limnol. 2000, 60, 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrometry, Draft method 7473; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Cizdziel, J.V.; Hinners, T.A.; Heithmar, E.M. Determination of total mercury in fish tissues using combustion atomic absorption spectrometry with gold amalgamation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002, 135, 355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S.A.; Van Sickle, J.; Hughes, R.M.; Schacher. J.A., Echols, S.F. A biopsy procedure for determining filet and predicting whole-fish mercury concentration. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2005, 48, 99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Method 1631 Revision E-Mercury in water by oxidation, purge, and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry: EPA-821-R-02-019: 38, US EPA: Washington, DC, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Olund, S.D.; DeWild J.F.; Olson, M.L.; Tate, M.T. Methods for preparation and analysis of solids and suspended solids for total mercury: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, vol. 5, chap. A8; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, G.R. Chloride interference in the analysis of dissolved organic carbon by the wet oxidation method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 2435–2439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.K. Quality Sssurance of Chemical Measurements; Lewis Publishers: Chelsea, MI, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Gesch, D.B. The National Elevation Dataset. In Maune, D. Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM Users Manual, 1st Ed.; Maune, D. Ed.; American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Bethesda, Maryland, 2007; 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• PAMAP. PAMAP program land cover for Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania geospatial data clearinghouse; University Park, PA, 2005. Available at http://www.pasda.psu.edu/uci/FullMetadataDisplay.aspx?file=palanduse05utm18nad83.xml. (accessed Mar 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for Pennsylvania. Available at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov (accessed Mar 2013).
   Google Scholar
• PASDA. Networked streams of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Geospatial Data Clearinghouse, 1998. Available at http://www.pasda.psu.edu/uci/FullMetadataDisplay.aspx?file=netstreams1998.xml (accessed Mar 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Eros, T. Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: the roles of habitat types and non-native species. Freshwater Biol. 2007, 52(7), 1400–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzweiser, D.P.; Hazlett, P.W., Gunn, J.M. Logging impacts on the biogeochemistry of boreal forest soils and nutrient export to aquatic systems: A review. Environ. Rev. 2008, 16, 157–179.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C.A.; Shmagin, B.A.; Frost, P.C.; Cherrier, C.; Larson, J.H.; Lamberti, G.A.; Bridgham, S.D. Wetland types and wetland maps differ in ability to predict dissolved organic carbon concentrations in streams. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 404(2–3), 326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudon, H.; Berggren, M.; Ågren, A.; Buffam, I.; Bishop, K.; Grabs, T.; Jansson, M.; Köhler, S. Patterns and dynamics of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in boreal streams: The role of processes, connectivity, and scaling. Ecosystems 2011, 14, 880–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittman, J.; Shanley, J.; Driscoll, C.; Aiken, G.; Chalmers, A.; Towse, J.; Selvendiran, P. Mercury dynamics in relation to dissolved organic carbon concentration and quality during high flow events in three northeastern U.S. streams. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46(7), W07522, doi:10.1029/2009WR008351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, D.; Riva-Murray, K.; Bradley, P.; Aiken, G.; Brigham, M. Landscape controls on total and methyl Hg in the upper Hudson River basin, New York, USA. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 117, (G1).
   Google Scholar
• Selvendiran, P.; Driscoll, C.; Bushey, J.; Montesdeoca, M. Wetland influence on mercury fate and transport in a temperate forested watershed. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 154, 46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Cai, Y., O’Driscoll, N., Eds. Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology of Mercury; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Somerset, NJ, 2012; 468–471.
   Google Scholar
• Munthe, J.; Hultberg, H. Mercury and methylmercury in runoff from a forested catchment – concentrations, fluxes, and their response to manipulation. Water Air Soil Poll..2004, 4, 607–618.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, M.T.K.; Finlay, J.C.; Nater, E.A. Mercury bioaccumulation in a stream network. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7016–7022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigal, D.F. Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review. Environ. Rev. 2002, 10, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• St. Louis, V.L.; Rudd, J.W.; Kelly, C.A.; Beaty, K.G.; Bloom, N.S.; Flett, R.J. Importance of wetlands as sources of methyl mercury to boreal forest ecosystems. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 51(5), 1065–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agren, A.; Löfgren, S. pH sensitivity of Swedish forest streams related to catchment characteristics and geographical location – Implications for forest bioenergy harvest and ash return. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 276, 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C.T. Ecological Effects of Acidic Deposition, In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C.; Driscoll, K.; Mitchell, M.; Raynal, J. Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in New York State. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 123, 327–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J.; Van Sickle, J.; Gagen, C.J.; DeWalle, D.R.; Sharpe, W.E.; Corlin, R.F.; Baldigo, B.P.; Murdoch, P.S.; Bath, D.W.; Krester, W.A.; Simonin, H.A.; Wigington, P.J. Episodic acidification of small streams in the northeastern United States: Effects on fish populations. Ecol. Soc. Am. 1996, 6, 422–437.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarstrom, J.M.; Brady, K.; Cravotta, C.A. Acid-Rock Drainage at Skytop, Centre County, Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1148. USGS: Reston, VA. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C.; Jack, R.; Lopez, L. Determination of anions in fracking flowback water from the Marcellus shale using automated dilution and ion chromatography. Thermo Scientific Technical Note 139, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jardine, T.D.; Kidd, K.A.; O’ Driscoll, N. Food web analysis reveals effects of pH on mercury bioaccumulation at multiple trophic levels in streams. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 132–133, 46–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedder, S.C.J.; Maly, E.J. The avoidance response of groups of juvenile brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis to varying levels of acidity. Aquat. Toxicol. 1986, 8(2), 111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonin H.A.; Krester W.A.; Bath D.W.; Olson M.; Gallagher J. In situ bioassays of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus) in Adirondack streams affected by episodic acidification. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50(5), 902–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldigo B.P.; Lawrence G.B. Effects of stream acidification and habitat on fish populations of a North American River. Aquat. Sci. 2001, 63, 196–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson R.H.; Coombs K.; Power J.; Paim U. Responses of several fish species to pH gradients. Can. J. Zool. 1989, 67(6), 1566–1572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shami, S.; Heino, J.; Salmah, M.; Hassan, A.; Suhaila, A.; Madrus, M. Drivers of beta diversity of macroinvertebrate communities in tropical forest streams. Freshwater Biol. 2013, 58(6), 1126–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaller, M.; Hartman K. Evidence of a threshold level of fine sediment accumulation for altering benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 2004, 518, 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M.; Winsor, L.; Nislow, K. What predicts the use by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) of terrestrial invertebrate subsidies in headwater streams? Freshwater Biol. 2013, 59(1), 187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, G.C.; Bartha, R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: Principal methylators of Mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50, 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, C.C.; Henry, E.A.; Mitchell, R. Sulfate stimulation of Mercury methylation in Freshwater Sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 2281–2287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, E.J.; Mack, E.E.; Green, P.G.; Nelson, D.C. 2006. Mercury Methylation from unexpected sources: Molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and Iron-reducing bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 457–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerin, E.J.; Gilmour, C.C.; Roden, E.; Suzuki, M.T.; Coates, J.D.; Mason, R.P. Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 7919–7921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cébron, A.; Beguiristain, T.; Faure, P.; Norini, M.P.; Masfaraud, J.F.; Leyval, C. Influence of vegetation on the in situ bacteria community and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) degraders in aged PAH-contaminated or Thermal-Desorption-treated soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75(19), 6322–6330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnivetskaya, T.A.; Mosher, J.J.; Palumbo, A.V.; Yang, Z.K.; Podar, M., Brown; S.D., Brooks; S.C., Gu, B.; Southworth, G.R.; Drake, M.M.; Brandt, C.C.; Elias, D.A. Mercury and other heavy metals influence bacterial community structure in contaminated Tennessee streams. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 302–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlemann, D.P.; Geissinger, O.; Brune, A. The Termite Group I Phylum is highly diverse and widespread in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6682–6685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dojka, M.A.; Hugenholtz, P.; Haack, S.K.; Pace, N.R. Microbial diversity in a hydrocarbon- and chlorinated-solvent-contaminated aquifer undergoing intrinsic bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3896–3977.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin-Dipasquale, M.; Lutz, M.A.; Brigham, M.E.; Krabbenhoft, D.P.; Aiken, G.R.; Orem, W.H.; Hall, B.D. Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems: Benthic methylmercury production and bed sediment-pore water partitioning. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009, 43, 2726–2732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson, A.J. Sources of mercury in sediments, Water, and fish of the lakes of Whatcom County, Washington. USGS, Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5084. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kamman, N.C.; Burgess, N.M.; Driscoll, C.T.; Simonin, H.A.; Goodale, W.; Linehan, J.; Estabrook, R.; Hutcheson, M.; Major, A.; Scheuhammer, A.M.; Scruton, D.A. Mercury in freshwater fish of Northeast North America: a geographic perspective based on fish tissue monitoring databases. Ecotoxicology 2005, 14, 163–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S.A.; Sickel, J.V.; Herlihy, A.T.; Hughes, RM. Mercury concentrations in fish from streams and rivers throughout the western United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41(1), 58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, J.G.; Knights, B.C.; Sandheinrich, M.B.; Jeremiason, J.D.; Brigham, M.E.; Engstrom, D.R.; Woodruff, L.G.; Cannon, W.F.; Balogh, S.J. Mercury in soils, lakes, and fish in Voyageurs National Park: importance of atmospheric deposition and ecosystem factors. Environ. Science Technol. 2006, 40, 6261–6268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C.T.; Han, Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Evers, D.C.; Fallon, L.K.; Holsen, T.M.; Kamman, N.C.; Munson, R.K. Mercury Contamination in Forest and Freshwater Ecosystems in the Northeastern United States. Bioscience 2007, 57(1), 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, M.S.; Hilderbrand, R.H.; Thompson, J.; Heft, A.; Rivers, S.E. Relationship between wetlands and mercury in brook trout. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 52, 97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mierzykowski, S.E.; Ruksznis, P.; McCaw, D.; Czapiga, J. Environmental contaminants in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) from Cove Brook and two tributaries of the Sheepscot River. USFWS. Spec. Proj. Rep. FY07-MEFO-5-EC. Maine Field Office. Old Town, ME, 2008. 41 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R.P.; Reinfelder, J.R.; Morel, F.M.M. Uptake, Toxicity, and Trophic Transfer of Mercury in a Coastal Diatom. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30(6), 1835–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watras, C.J.; Back, R.C.; Halvorsen, S.; Hudson, R.J.M.; Morrisson, K.A.; Wente, S.P. Bioaccumulation of mercury in pelagic freshwater food webs. Sci Total Environ. 1998, 219, 183–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, B.K.; Hrabik, T.R.; Harvey, C.J.; Carpenter, S.R. Predicting mercury levels in yellow perch: use of water chemistry, trophic ecology, and spatial traits. Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2001, 58, 1419–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, R.; Chen, C.Y.; Pickhardt, P.C.; Fisher, N.S.; Folt, C.L. Stoichiometric controls of mercury dilution by growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 7477–7482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homeostasis and Toxicology of Non-Essential Metals, In Fish Physiology, Wood, Chris M., Farrell, Anthony P., Brauner, Colin J. Eds.; Academic Press, 2011, Vol. 31B, 1–531.
   Google Scholar
• Homeostasis and Toxicology of Non-Essential Metals, In Fish Physiology, Wood, Chris M., Farrell, Anthony P., Brauner, Colin J. Eds.; Academic Press, 2011, Vol. 31B, 1–531.
   Google Scholar
• Boudou; A., Ribeyre, F. Contamination of aquatic biocenoses by mercury compounds: an experimental ecotoxicological approach. In Aquatic Toxicology (Advances in Environmental Sceince and Technology), John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1983, Vol. 13, 73–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lemes, M.; Wang, F. Methylmercury speciation in fish muscle by HPLC-ICP_MS following enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2009, 24, 663–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentes, S.; Maury-Brachet, R.; Guyoneaud, R.; Monperrus, M.; Andre, J.; Davail, S.; Legeay, A. Mercury bioaccumulation along food webs in temperate aquatic ecosystems colonized by aquatic macrophytes in south western France. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2013, 91, 180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouba, A.; Buric, M.; Kozak, P. Bioaccumulation and effects of heavy metals in crayfish: a review. Water Air and Soil Pollut. 2010, 211, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, A.; Arcagni, M.; Arribére, M.A.; Bubach, D.; Ribeiro Guevara, S. Mercury in the biotic compartments of Northwest Patagonia lakes, Argentina. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 454–455, 170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R.; Laporte, J.M.; Andres, S. Factors controlling the bioaccumulation of mercury, methylmercury, arsenic, selenium, and cadmium by freshwater invertebrates and fish. Arch. Environ Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchanek, T.H.; Richerson, P.J.; Zierenberg, R.A.; Eagles-Smith, C.A.; Slotton, D.G.; Harner, E.J.; Osleger, D.A.; Anderson, D.W.; Cech, J.J.; Schladow, S.G.; Colwell, A.E.; Mount, J.F.; King, P.S.; Adam, D.P.; McElroy, K.J. The Legacy of Mercury Cycling from Mining Sources in an Aquatic Ecosystem: From Ore to Organism. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18(8), A12–A28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, O.; Boudou, A. Simultaneous experimental study of direct and direct plus trophic contamination of the crayfish Astacus astacus by inorganic mercury and methylmercury. Environ Toxicol. Chem. 2001, 20(6), 1206–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barriada J.L.; Herrero R.; Prada-Rodriguez D.; Sastre de Vicente M.E. Interaction of mercury with chitin: A physicochemical study of metal binding by a natural biopolymer. React. Funct. Polym. 2008, 68(12), 1609–1618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boening D.W. Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere 2000, 40 (12), 1335–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho J.P.; Reis A.T.; Ventura S.; Pereiera M.E.; Duarte A.C.; Pardal M.A. Pattern and pathways for mercury lifespan bioaccumulation in Carcinus maenas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56(6), 1104–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizek S.; Horvat M.; Gibicar D.; Fajon V.; Toman M.J. Bioaccumulation of mercury in benthic communities of a river ecosystem affected by mercury mining. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 377(2-3), 407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennuto, C.M.; Lane, O.P.; Evers, D.C; Taylor, R.J.; Loukmas, J. Mercury in the Northern Crayfish, Orconectes virilis (Hagen), in New England, USA. Ecotoxicology 2005, 14(1-2), 149–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklina, I.; Kouba, A.; Kozák, P. Real-time monitoring of water quality using fish and crayfish as bio-indicators: a review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185(6), 5043–5053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva-Murray, K.; Chasar, L.C.; Bradley, P.M.; Burns, D.A.; Brigham, M.E.; Smith, M.J.; Abrahamson, T.A. Spatial patterns of mercury in macroinvertebrates and fishes from streams of two contrasting forested landscapes in the eastern United States. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 1530–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, K.M.; Gowland, J.A.; Dillon, P.J. Mercury concentration in black flies Simulium spp. (Diptera, Simuliidae) from soft-water streams in Ontario, Canada. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 143(3), 529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T.R.; Bubier, J.L.; Heyes, A.; Flett, R.J. Methyl and total mercury in boreal wetland plants, experimental lakes area, northwestern Ontario. J. Environ. Qual. 1995, 24(5), 845–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veglio, F.; Beolchini, F. Removal of metals by biosorption: a review. Hydrometallurgy 1997, 44, 301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouvet, C.; Morhain, E.; Sutter, C.; Couturieux, N. Aquatic mosses for the detection and follow-up of accidental discharges in surface waters. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1993, 66, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikolainen, J.; Kubin, E.; Piispanen, J.; Karhu, J. Atmospheric heavy metal deposition in Finland during 1985–2000 using mosses as bioindicators. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 318, 171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, R.; Adatto, I.; Monesdeoca, M.R.; Driscoll, C.T.; Hines, M.E.; Barkay, T. Mercury methylation in Sphagnum moss mats and its association with sulfate-reducing bacteria in an acidic Adirondack forest lake wetland. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 74(3), 655–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 655–bert, K.F.; Holsen, T.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Clair, T.A.; Butler, T. Biological mercury hotspots in the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Biosci. Mag. 2007, 57, 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultberg, H.; Iverfeldt, A.; Lee, Y.H. Methylmercury input and accumulation in forested catchments and critical loads for lakes in southewestern Sweden. In Mercury Pollution: Integration and Synthesis: Watras, J., Huckabee, J.W. Eds. Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL; 1994; 313–322.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.H.; Bishop, K.H.; Munthe, J.; Iverfeldt, A.; Verta, M.; Parkman, H.; Hulberg, H. An examination of current Hg deposition and export in Fenno-Scandian cathments. Biogeochemistry 1998, 40, 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar