Modelling anaerobic digestion in an industrial biogas digester: Application of lactate-including ADM1 model (Part II)

References

• Weissbach, F. Gas production potential of fresh and ensiled sugar beets in biogas production. Landtechnik. 2009, 64(6), 394–397.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H.T.; Nie, Y.F. Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in China. J. Air &Waste Manage Assoc. 2001, 51, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B.; Wei-min, C.; Pin-jing, H. Influence of lactic acid on the two-phase anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19, 244–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoso- Bravo, A.; Mailier, J.; Martin, C.; Rodriguez, J.; Aceves-Lara, C.; Wouwer, A.V. Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: A review. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5347–5364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen, M.; Sperl, D.; Gadermaier, M.; Goberna, M.; Franke- Whittle, I.; Insam, H.; Ablinger, J.; Bermhard, W. Population dynamics at digester overload conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(23), 5648–5655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batstone D.J.; Keller, J.; Angelidaki, I.; Kalyuzhnyi, S.V.; Pavlostathis, S.G.; Rozzi, A.; Sanders, W. T.; Siegrist, H.; Vavilin, V. A. Anaerobic digestion model no.1. International Water Association, London, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P.; Steinigeweg, S.; Borchert, A.; Uhlenhut, F.; Brehm, A. Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for describing an existing biogas power plant. Biomass Bioenerg. 2013, 59, 441–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamisiriroj, T.; Nizami, A.S.; Murphy, J.D. Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long term operation? Appl. Energ. 2012, 95, 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soda, S.; Wada, K.; Okuda, M.; Ike, M. Application of modified ADM1 to long-term experiments for methane/hydrogen production from model organic waste. Water Pract. Tech. 2011, 6(1), wpt2011009.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Lu X. Exploring optimal feed to microbes ratio for anaerobic acidogenic fermentation of cassava residue from brewery. BioResour. 2012, 7(1), 1111–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonopoulou, G.; Gavala, H.N.; Skiadas I.V.; Lyberatos, G. Modeling of fermentative hydrogen production from sweet sorghum extract based on modified ADM. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2012, 37, 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiasson, B. Anaerobic digestion generates fatty acids. Ind. Bioproces. 2004, 26(6), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pipyn, P.; Verstraete, W. Lactate and ethanol as intermediates in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 28, 1145–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Yoshida, N.; Tohno, M.; Uegaki, R.; Nonaka, K.; Terada, F. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculant and beet pulp addition on fermentation characteristics and in vitro ruminal digestion of vegetable residue silage. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94(8), 3902–3912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubalua, A.O. Cassava wastes: treatment options and value addition alternatives. Afr J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6(18), 2065–2073.
   Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P.; Steinigeweg, S.; Cypionka, H.; Engelen, B. Different substrates and starter inocula govern microbial community structures in biogas reactors. Environ. Technol. 2016, 37(11), 1441–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P.; Steinigeweg, S.; Siefert, E.; Cypionka, C. Effect of lactate and starter inoculum on biogas production from fresh maize and maize silage (under review).
   Google Scholar
• Satpathy, P.; Biernacki, B.; Uhlenhut, F.; Cypionka, H.; Steinigeweg, S. Modelling anaerobic digestion in a biogas reactor: ADM1 model development with lactate as parameter (Part I). J. Environ. Sci. Health A. 2016, ( in press).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EWE Biogas GmbH & Co. KG. Wittmund biogas power plant: important data at a glance. Available at http://www.ewe-biogas.de/english/index_28.php. (accessed Jan 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, C.; Uhlenhut, F.; Schlaak, M.; Borchert, A.; Steinigeweg, S. Simulationsunterstuetzte Prozessfuehrung von Biogasanlagen. Nuernberg, Dechema Gesselschaft fuer Chemische Technik. Posterbeitrag und Abstract, DECHEMA-Tagung: Bioprozessorientiertes Anlagendesign. Chem. Tech. 2010, 108–109.
   Google Scholar
• IFAK. SIMBA_ 5.1. User's guide. Magdeburg: Ifak System GmbH, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, K.; Lübken, M.; Gehring, T.; Wichern, M.; Horn H. Biogas from grass silage measurements and modelling with ADM1. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(21), 8158–8165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Soest, P.J.; Wine, R.H. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J. Assoc. Off Anal. Chem. 1967, 50, 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, C.; Bassler, R. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA-Verlag: Darmstadt, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI). Fermentation of organic material. Characterization of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI): Dusseldorf, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wichern, M.; Gehring, T.; Fischer, K.; Andrade, D.; Lübken, M.; Koch, K.; Gronauer, A.; Horn, H. Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: measurements and mathematical modelling with ADM1. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(4), 1675–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinken, L. Mathematische Modellierung von anaeroben Abbauprozessen unterschiedlicher Substrate auf Basis des, Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1”. PhD dissertation. Leibnitz University, Hannover, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder, J.A.; Mead, R. A simple method for function minimization. Comput. J. 1965, 7(4), 308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The MathWorks, Inc. MATLAB – Optimization toolboxTM 6. user's Guide. The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA, USA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Peiris, B.R.H.; Rathnasiri, P.G.; Johansen, J.E.; Kuhn, A.; Bakke, R. ADM1 with modifications for Bio-hydrogen Simulations. Water Sci Technol. 2006, 53(8), 129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar