The influence of multiple chemical and non-chemical stressors on benthic communities in a mid-west agricultural stream

References

• Pimental, D. World Soil Erosion and Conservation, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Humenik, F. J.; Smolen, M. D.; Dressing, S. A. Pollution from non-point sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1987, 21, 737–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loague, K.; Corwin, D. L.; Ellsworth, T. R. The challenge of predicting non-point source pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 130–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R.; Chu, E. W. Restoring Life in Running Waters – Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press: Covelo, CA, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, C. O.; Rankin, E. T. Biological criteria program development and implementation in Ohio. In Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools of Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Davis, W. S.; Simon, T. P. Eds., Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, 1995; 109–144.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. T.; Gerritsen, J.; Griffith, G. E.; Frydenborg, R.; McCarron, E.; White, J. S.; Bastian, M. L. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 1996, 15, 185–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. F.; Sutcliffe, D. W.; Furse, M. T. Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwater: RIVPACS and Other Techniques, Freshwater Biological Association: Ableside, Cumbria, UK, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, J.; Hendley, P.; Holmes, C.; Ritter, A.; Desmarteau, D.; Winchell, M.; Wirtz, J.. Ecological risk assessment of agricultural uses of nine synthetic pyrethroids. Report for the Pyrethroid Working Group, PWG-ERA-18: Valdosta, GA, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Preliminary comparative environmental fate and ecological risk assessment for registration review of eight synthetic pyrethroids and pyrethrins: Part III. Agricultural uses of pyrethroids. Report DP Barcode: D433338, U. S. EPA, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate and Effects Division: Washington, DC, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W. Jr.; Killen, W. D.; Anderson, R. D. A pilot study for developing a study design for assessing the condition of benthic communities with concurrent physical habitat, bifenthrin, nutrients, and water quality conditions in an Illinois agricultural stream. Report for FMC Corporation prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center: Queenstown, MD, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kazyak, P. F. Maryland Biological Stream Survey Sampling Manual, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay Research and Monitoring Division: Annapolis, MD, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for Assessing Habitat in Flowing Waters: Using the Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI). Ohio EPA Technical Bulletin EAS/2006–06–1: Groveport, OH, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, E. T. The Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index (QHEI): Rationale, methods and application. Report Division Water Quality Plan and Assessment, Ecological Assessment Section: Columbus, OH, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, E. T. The Use of Habitat Assessments in Water Resource Management Programs. In Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Davis, W.; Simon, T. Eds, Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, 1995; 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W. Jr.; Killen, W. D.; Anderson, R. D.; Alden, R. W. III. An assessment of benthic communities with concurrent bifenthrin, physical habitat, nutrients, PCBs, metals, sediment characteristics and water quality analysis in Big Bureau Creek Illinois in 2016 and 2014–2016. Final report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center: Queenstown, MD, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). SW-846, Method 9060A: Total Organic Carbon. Report. U. S. EPA Office of Water: Washington, DC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test method for particle size analysis of soils. Method D422–63, Philadelphia, PA, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Buchman, M. F. NOAA Screening Reference Tables. NOAA HAZMAT Report 99–1. Coastal Protection and Restoration Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Seattle, WA, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Plumb, R. H. Procedures for handling and chemical analysis of sediment and water samples. Report, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station: Vicksburg, MS, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dell, J. W. Determination of ammonia nitrogen by semi-automated colorimetry (Method 350.1). Report Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, Ohio, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dell, J. W. Determination of nitrate-nitrite nitrogen by automated colorimetry (Method 353.2). Report Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, Ohio, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dell, J. W. Determination of phosphorus by semi-automated colorimetry (Method 365.1). Report Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, Ohio, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, R. L. Laboratory validation: validation of the residue analytical method: residue analytical for the determination of residues of bifenthrin, cypermethrin, cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, esfenvalerate, fenpropathrin, lambda-cyhalothrin and permethrin in sediment. Final Report. Protocol No. MLI-06–02. Morse Labs Project No. ML06–1286-PWG, Morse Laboratories, Inc. Sacramento, CA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life: Volume III. Standardized Biological Field Sampling and Laboratory Methods for Assessing Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities. Report. Ohio EPA, Ecological Assessment Section, Division of Water Quality, Planning and Assessment: Columbus, OH, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, J.; Born, M. Measuring the health of California streams and rivers – A methods manual for water resource professionals, citizen monitors, and natural resource students. Report. Sustainable Land Stewardship International Institute: Sacramento, CA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Amweg, E. L.; Weston, D. P.; You, J.; Lydy, M. J. Pyrethroid insecticides and sediment toxicity in urban creeks for California and Tennessee. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 1700–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W. J.; Anderson, R. D.; Killen, W. D.; Alden, R. W. III. A summary of case studies designed to determine the influence of multiple stressors on benthic communities in urban California streams. In Describing the Behavior and Effects of Pesticides in Urban and Agricultural Settings, Jones, R.; Shamim, M.; Jackson, S. H., Eds., ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2014; 135–152.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. Statistical Analysis Program. Version 9.1, Cary, NC, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W. Jr.; Killen, W. D.; Anderson, R.D.; Alden, R. W. III. An assessment of benthic communities with concurrent bifenthrin, physical habitat, nutrients, PCBs, metals, sediment characteristics and water quality analysis in Big Bureau Creek Illinois in 2014. Progress report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center: Queenstown, MD, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W. Jr; Killen, W. D.; Anderson, R. D.; Alden, R. W. III. An assessment of benthic communities with concurrent bifenthrin, physical habitat, nutrients, PCBs, metals, sediment characteristics and water quality analysis in Big Bureau Creek Illinois in 2015. Progress report prepared by the University of Maryland, Wye Research and Education Center: Queenstown, MD, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Fact Sheet EPA EcoRegional Nutrient Criteria. EPA-822-F-02–008, Washington, DC, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W. Jr.; Anderson, R. D.; Killen, W. D.; Hosmer, A. J.; Brain, R. A. Assessment of periphyton, aquatic macrophytes, benthic communities, and physical habitat in midwestern United States streams coinciding with varying historical concentrations of atrazine. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A. 2014, 49, 1091–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. J.; Morgan, R. P. II; Stranko, S. Relations between macroinvertebrate, nutrients, and water quality criteria in wadeable streams of Maryland, USA. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 1167–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Robertson, D. M.; Garrison, P. J. Linkages between nutrients and assemblages of macroinvertebrates and fish in wadeable streams: Implications to nutrient criteria development. Environ. Manage. 2007, 39, 194–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul, J. D.; Farris, J. L.; Milam, C. D.; Cooper, C. M.; Testa, S. III, Feldman, D. L. The influence of stream habitat and water quality on macroinvertebrate communities in degraded streams of northwest Mississippi. Hydrobiologia. 2004, 518, 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miracle, M. R.; Moss, B.; Vicente, E.; Romo, S.; Rueda, J.; Becares, E.; Fernandez-Alaez, C.; Fernadez-Alaez, M.; Hietala, J.; Kairesalo, T.; Vakkilanem, K, Stephen, D.; Hansson, L. A.; Gyllstrom, M. Response of macroinvertebrates to experimental nutrient and fish additions in European localities at different latitudes. Limnetica. 2006, 25, 585–612.
   Google Scholar
• State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Volume I-III. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency: Columbus, OH, 1987.
   Google Scholar