Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge

References

• Cecchi, F.; Cavinato, C. Anaerobic Digestion of Bio-Waste: A Mini-Review Focusing on Territorial and Environmental Aspects. Waste Manage. Res. 2015, 33, 429–438. DOI:10.1177/0734242X14568610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K. W.; Voraberger, H. Exploiting the Medium Term Biomass Energy Potentials in Austria. A Comparison of Costs and Macroeconomic Impact. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2003, 24, 359–377. DOI:10.1023/A:1023680125027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricase, C.; Lombardi, M. State of the Art and Prospects of Italian Biogas Production from Animal Sewage: Technical-Economic Considerations. Renewable Energy 2009, 34, 477–485. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidaki, A.; Alves, M.; Bolzonella, D.; Borzacconi, L.; Campos, J. L.; Guwy, A. J.; Kalyuzhnyi, S.; Jenicek, P.; van Lier; J. B. Defining the Biomethane Potential (BMP) of Solid Organic Wastes and Energy Crops: A Proposed Protocol for Batch Assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(5), 927–934. DOI:10.2166/wst.2009.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruergaard, T.; Hyks, J.; Astrup, T. Life-Cycle Assessment of Selected Management Options for Air Pollution Control Residues from Waste Incineration. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 10(15), 4672–4680. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.029.
   Google Scholar
• Giovanis, E. Relationship Between Recycling Rate and Air Pollution: Waste Management in the State of Massachusetts. Waste Manage. 2015, 40, 192–203. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, J. L.; Rovira, J.; Vilavert, L.; Nadal, M.; Figueras, M. J.; Schuhmacher, M. Health Risks for the Population Living in the Vicinity of an Integrated Waste Management Facility: Screening Environmental Pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 518–519, 363–370. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, M.; Lopes, H.; Tarelho; L. A. C. Critical Aspects of Biomass Ashes Utilization in Soils: Composition; Leachability; PAH and PCDD/F. Waste Manage. 2015, 46, 304–315. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakalis, S.; Boschiero, M.; Moustakas, K.; Sotiropoulos, A.; Malamis, D.; Zerbe, S.; Baratieri; M. Assessing the Suitability of Biomass Ashes from Combustion in Boilers as Soil Fertilizers: Statistical Entropy Analysis and Introduction of the Potassium Utilization Potential Factor. Waste Biomass Valorization 2017, 8(5), 1569–1576. DOI:10.1007/s12649-017-9852-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambone, F.; Terruzzi, L.; Scaglia, B.; Adani, F. Composting of the Solid Fraction of Digestate Derived from Pig Slurry: Biological Processes and Compost Properties. Waste Manage. 2015, 35, 55–61. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delzeit, R.; Kellner, U. The Impact of Plant Size and Location on Profitability of Biogas Plants in Germany Under Consideration of Processing Digestates. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 52, 43–53. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Särkilahti, M.; Kinnunen, V.; Kettunen, R.; Jokinen, A.; Rintala, J. Replacing Centralised Waste and Sanitation Infrastructure with Local Treatment and Nutrient Recycling: Expert Opinions in the Context of Urban Planning. Technological Forecasting Soc. Change 2017, 118, 195–204. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L.; Ge, X.; Wan, C.; Yu, F.; Li, Y. Progress and Perspectives in Converting Biogas to Transportation Fuels. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2014, 40, 1133–1152. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkering; J.; Hengeveld; E. J.; van Gemert; W. J. T.; Broekhuis; A. A. Will Implementation of Green Gas Into the Gas Supply be Feasible in the Future? Appl. Energ. 2015, 140, 409–417. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBA (World Bioenergy Association). Global bioenergy statistics. 2016. available at http://worldbioenergy.org/uploads/WBA%20Global%20Bioenergy%20Statistics%202016.pdf (Last access January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Capodaglio, A. G.; Callegari; A.; Lopez, M. V. European Framework for the Diffusion of Biogas Uses: Emerging Technologies; Acceptance; Incentive Strategies; and Institutional-Regulatory Support. Sustainability 2016, 8, 298–315. DOI:10.3390/su8040298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallquist, L.; L'Orange Seigo, S.; Visschers, V. H. M.; Siegrist, M. Public Acceptance of CCS System Elements: A Conjoint Measurement. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 6, 77–83. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soland, M.; Steimer, N.; Walter, G. Local Acceptance of Existing Biogas Plants in Switzerland. Energy Policy 2013, 61, 802–810. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijazi, O.; Munro, S.; Zerhusen, B.; Effenberger, M. Review of Life Cycle Assessment for Biogas Production in Europe. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 1291–1300. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratti, C.; Barbanera, M.; Fantozzi, F. Assessment of GHG Emissions of Biomethane from Energy Cereal Crops in Umbria; Italy. Appl. Energy 2013, 108, 128–136. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmaier, J.; Effenberger, M.; Gronauer, A. Greenhouse Gas Balance and Resource Demand of Biogas Plants in Agriculture. Eng. Life Sci. 2010, 10(6), 560–569. DOI:10.1002/elsc.201000073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battini, F.; Agostini, A.; Boulamanti, A. K.; Giuntoli, J.; Amaducci, S. Mitigating the Environmental Impacts of Milk Production Via Anaerobic Digestion of Manure: Case Study of a Dairy Farm in the Po Valley. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 481, 196–208. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaparaju, P.; Rintala, J. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Adopting Anaerobic Digestion Technology on Dairy; Sow and Pig Farms in Finland. Renewable Energy 2011, 36, 31–41. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2010.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikosz, J. Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Energy Balance in a Model Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57(59), 28551–28559. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2016.1192491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M.; Nielsen, O. K.; Plejdrup, M. Danish emission inventory for stationary combustion plants. Scientific Report from DCE – Danish Centre for Environment and Energy; No. 102; 2014. Available at http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR102.pdf (Last access January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Poeschl, M.; Ward, S.; Owende, P. Environmental Impacts of Biogas Deployment e Part I: Life Cycle Inventory for Evaluation of Production Process Emissions to Air. J. Cleaner Product. 2012, 24, 168–183. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. E. Nephrotoxicity Resulting from Multiple Chemical Exposures and Chemical Interactions. Toxicology of Chemical Mixtures; Academic Press: San Diego (USA), 1994; pp 335–360.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, S.; Zhao, L.; Gomes, J. Methane and Natural Gas Exposure Limits. Epidemiology 2011, 22(1), S251. DOI:10.1097/01.ede.0000392463.93990.1e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2013; Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Working Group I; The Physical Science Basis; Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/ (Last access January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. S.; Hauggard-Nielsen, H.; Heiske, S.; Jensen, M.; Thomsen, S.; Schmidt, J. E.; Johansen, A.; Ambus, P. Consequences of field N2O Emissions for the Environmental Sustainability of Plant-Based Biofuels Produced Within an Organic Farming System. Global Change Biol. (CBG) Bioenergy 2012, 4, 435–452. DOI:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01132.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senbayram, M.; Chen, R.; Wienforth, B.; Herrmann, A.; Kage, H.; Mühling, K. H.; Dittert, K. Emission of N2O from Biogas Crop Production Systems in Northern Germany. Bioenerg. Res. 2014, 7, 1223–1236. DOI:10.1007/s12155-014-9456-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iordan, C.; Lausselet, C.; Cherubini, F. Life-Cycle Assessment of a Biogas Power Plant with Application of Different Climate Metrics and Inclusion of Near-Term Climate Forcers. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 184, 517–527. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Aurich, A.; Schattauer, A.; Hellebrand, H. J.; Klauss, H.; Plöchl, M.; Berg, W. Impact of Uncertainties on Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential of Biogas Production from Agricultural Resources. Renewable Energy 2012, 37, 277–284. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Background Information Document for Updating AP42 Section 2.4 for Estimating Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Office of Research and Development. Report number EPA/600/R-08-116; 2008. Available at: https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch02/draft/db02s04.pdf (Last access January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, P. G.; Jensen, J. K.; Nielsen, M.; Illerup, J. B. Emission Factors for Gas Fired CHP units <25 MW. Danish Gas Technology Centre and National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark. 2004. Available at http://www.dgc.eu/sites/default/files/filarkiv/documents/C0402_emissions_factors.pdf (Last access January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• NSCA (National Society for Clean Air and Environment of United Kingdom). Comparison of Emissions from Waste Management Options; BN2 9QA; Brighton, UK, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Petracchini, F.; Romagnoli, P.; Paciucci, L.; Vichi, F.; Imperiali, A.; Paolini, V.; Liotta, F.; Cecinato, A. Influence of Transport from Urban Sources and Local Biomass Combustion on the Air Quality of a Mountain Area. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24(5), 4741–4754. DOI:10.1007/s11356-016-8111-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beylot, A.; Vaxelaire, S.; Zdanevitch, I.; Auvinet, N.; Villeneuve, J. Life Cycle Assessment of Mechanical Biological Pre-Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste: A Case study. Waste Manage. 2015, 39, 287–294. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreras-Sospedra, M.; Williams, R.; Dabdub, D. Assessment of the Emissions and Air Quality Impacts of Biomass and Biogas Use in California. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2016, 66(2), 134–150. DOI:10.1080/10962247.2015.1087892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasi, S.; Veijanen, A.; Rintala, J. Trace Compounds of Biogas from Different Biogas Production Plants. Energy 2007, 32, 1375–1380. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar Gomez, J. I.; Lohmann, H.; Krassowski, J. Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds from Biowaste and Cofermentation Biogas Plants by Single-Sorbent Adsorption. Chemosphere 2016, 153, 48–57. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smet, E.; Van Langenhove, H.; De Bo, I. The Emission of Volatile Compounds During the Aerobic and the Combined Anaerobic/Aerobic Composting Of Biowaste. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 1295–1303. DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00260-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, E.; Roca, F. J.; Perales, J. F.; Guardino, X.; Gadea, E.; Garrote, P. Impact of Formaldehyde and VOCs from Waste Treatment Plants Upon the Ambient Air Nearby an Urban Area (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 568, 369–380. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borjesson, P.; Berglund, M. Environmental Systems Analysis of Biogas Systems-Part I: Fuel-Cycle Emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 469–485. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulamanti, A. K.; Donida Maglio, S.; Giuntoli, J.; Agostini, A. Influence of Different Practices on Biogas Sustainability. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 53, 149–161. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, S. G. Ammonia volatilization from farm tanks containing anaerobically digestedanimal slurry. Atmos. Environ. 1997, 31, 863–868. DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00250-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K.; Romain, A. C.; Locoge, N.; Redon, N. Application of Chemical Mass Balance Methodology to Identify the Different Sources Responsible for the Olfactory Annoyance at a Receptor-Site. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012, 30, 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Nie, X.; Li, R.; Song, M. In-Situ Emission Characteristics of Odorous Gases from two Food Waste Processing Plants. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2013, 15, 510–515. DOI:10.1007/s10163-013-0174-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, J.; Trimborn, M.; Weiland, P.; Amon, B. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Slurry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112, 171–177. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, K. Effects of Anaerobic Digestion on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Turnover; N Emissions; and Soil Biological Activity. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1021–1041. DOI:10.1007/s13593-015-0284-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambone, F.; Genevini, P.; D'Imporzano, G.; Adani, F. Assessing Amendment Properties of Digestate by Studying the Organic Matter Composition and the Degree of Biological Stability During the Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of MSW. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3140–3142. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickenscheidt, T.; Freibauer, A.; Heinichen, J.; Augustin, J.; Drösler, M. Short-Term Effects of Biogas Digestate and Cattle Slurry Application on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Affected by N Availability from Grasslands on Drained Fen Peatlands and Associated Organic Soils. Biogeosciences 2014, 11, 6187–6207. DOI:10.5194/bg-11-6187-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshita; K.; Okumura, T.; Takaoka, M.; Fujimori, T.; Appels, L.; Dewil, R. Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Anaerobic Digestion of Sludge in Japanese Sewage Treatment Facilities. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171, 175–181. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, J.; Huschka, A. The Effect of Biological Oxygen Demand of Cattle Slurry and Soil Moisture on Nitrous Oxide Emissions. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 2001, 59, 193–198. DOI:10.1023/A:1017562603343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oenema, O.; Wrage, N.; Velthof, G. L.; van Groenigen, J. W.; Dolfing, J.; Kuikman, P. J. Trends in Global Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Animal Production Systems. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 2005, 72, 51–65. DOI:10.1007/s10705-004-7354-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, K.; Stinner, W. Effects of Different Manuring Systems with and Without Biogas Digestion on Soil Mineral Nitrogen Content and Gaseous Nitrogen Losses (Ammonia; Nitroux Oxide). Europ. J. Agronomy 2009, 30, 1–16. DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2008.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, A.; Inubushi, K. Effect of Biogas Digested Liquid on CH4 and N2O Flux in Paddy Ecosystem. J. Integr. Agric. 2014, 13(3), 635–640. DOI:10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60721-2.
   Google Scholar
• Win, A. T.; Toyota, K.; Win, K. T.; Motobayashi, T.; Ookawa, T.; Hirasawa, T.; Chen, D.; Lu, J. Effect of Biogas Slurry Application on CH4 and N2O Emissions; Cu and Zn Uptakes by Whole Crop Rice in a Paddy Field in Japan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2014, 60, 411–422. DOI:10.1080/00380768.2014.899886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoneim, A.; Ueno, H.; Ebin, A.; Asagi, N.; El Darag, A. Analysis of Nitrogen Dynamics and Fertilizer use Efficiency Using the Nitrogen 15 Isotope Dilution Method Following the Application of Biogas Slurry or Chemical Fertilizer. Int. J. Soil Sci. 2008, 3(1), 11–19. DOI:10.3923/ijss.2008.11.19.
   Google Scholar
• VTT (Technical Research Centre of Finland). Greenhouse gas emissions and removals in Finland. 15 March 2006. Available at https://tilastokeskus.fi/tup/khkinv/fin_nir_2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Matsunaka, T.; Sawamoto, T.; Ishimura, H.; Takakura, K.; Takekawa, A. Efficient use of Digested Cattle Slurry from Biogas Plant with Respect to Nitrogen Recycling in Grassland. Int. Cong. Ser. 2006, 1293, 242–252. DOI:10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.016.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, A.; Carter, M. S.; Jensen, E. S.; Hauggard-Nielsen, H.; Ambus, P. Effects of Digestate from Anaerobically Digested Cattle Slurry and Plant Materials on Soil Microbial Community and Emission of CO2 and N2O. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 63, 36–44. DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva, C.; Orzi, V.; Carozzi, M.; Acutis, M.; Boccasile, G.; Lonati, S.; Tambone, F.; D'Imporzano, G.; Adani, F. Short-Term Experiments in Using Digestate Products as Substitutes for Mineral (N) Fertilizer: Agronomic Performance; Odours; and Ammonia Emission Impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 547, 206–214. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govasmark, E.; Stäb, J.; Holen, B.; Hoornstra, D.; Nesbakk, T.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M. Chemical and Microbiological Hazards Associated with Recycling of Anaerobic Digested Residue Intended for Agricultural Use. Waste Manag. 2011, 12, 2577–2583. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.025.
   Google Scholar
• Suominen, K.; Verta, M.; Marttinen, S. Hazardous Organic Compounds in Biogas Plant end Products-Soil Burden and Risk to Food Safety. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 491, 192–199. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filidei, S.; Masciandaro, G.; Ceccanti, B. Anaerobic Digestion of Olive Oil Mill Effluents: Evaluation of Wastewater Organic Load and Phytotoxicity Reduction. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2003, 145, 79–94. DOI:10.1023/A:1023619927495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salati, S.; D'Imporzano, G.; Panseri, S.; Pasquale, E.; Adani, F. Degradation of Aflatoxin B1 During Anaerobic Digestion and Its Effect on Process Stability. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 2014, 94, 19–23. DOI:10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erisman, J. W.; Schaap, M. The Need for Ammonia Abatement with Respect to Secondary PM Reductions in Europe. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 129, 159–163. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2003.08.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. M.; Jones, A. M.; Lawrence, R. G. Major Component Composition of PM10 and PM2.5 from Roadside and Urban Background Sites. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38(27), 4531–4538. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravina, M.; Genon, G. Global and Local Emissions of a Biogas Plant Considering the Production of Biomethane as an Alternative End-Use Solution. J. Cleaner Product. 2015, 102, 115–126. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beylot, A.; Villeneuve, J.; Bellenfant, G. Life Cycle Assessment of Landfill Biogas Management: Sensitivity to Diffuse and Combustion Air Emissions. Waste Manage. 2013, 33, 401–411. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertl, A.; Mostbauer, P.; Obersteiner, G. Climate Balance of Biogas Upgrading Systems. Waste Manage. 2010, 30, 92–99. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petracchini, F.; Paolini, V.; Liotta, F.; Paciucci; L.; Facci, E. Vacuum Swing Adsorption on Natural Zeolites from Tuffs in a Prototype Plant. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Dev. 2017b, 36(3), 887–894. DOI:10.1002/ep.12530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, K.; Gabarrell, X.; Villalba, G.; Talens Peiro, L.; Lombardi, L. Potential CO2 Savings Through Biomethane Generation from Municipal Waste Biogas. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 62, 8–16. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson Påledal, S.; Arrhenius, K.; Moestedt, J.; Engelbrektsson, J.; Stensen, K. Characterisation and Treatment of VOCs in Process Water from Upgrading Facilities for Compressed Biogas (CBG). Chemosphere 2016, 145, 424–430. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMEP/EEA (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme; European Environmental Agency). Emission inventory guidebook 2016. Section 1.A.3.b.iii Heavy-duty vehicles including buses. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2016 (Accessed January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Semple, S.; Apsley, A.; Wushishi, A.; Smith, J. Commentary: Switching to Biogas What Effect Could It Have on Indoor Air Quality and Human Health? Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 10, 125–129. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.054.
   Google Scholar