Evaluation of the impact of soil contamination with mercury and application of soil amendments on the yield and chemical composition of Avena sativa L.

References

• Boening, D. W. Ecological Effects, Transport, and Fate of Mercury: A General Review. Chemosphere 2000, 40, 1335–1351. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00283-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvat, M. Mercury as a Global Pollutant. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 981–982. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-002-1605-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindbom, K.; Munthe, J. Product-Related Emissions of Mercury to Air in the European Union. IVL Svedish Environmental Research Institute Report 2007, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Boszke, L.; Kowalski, A.; Astel, A.; Barański, A.; Gworek, B.; Siepak, J. Mercury Mobility and Bioavailability in Soil from Contaminated Area. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55, 1075–1087. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-007-1056-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean, P.; Nielsen, J. B. Mercury. In Environmental Toxicants – Human Exposures and Their Health Effects; Lippmann M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009; pp 811–822.
   Google Scholar
• Pacyna, E. G.; Pacyna, J. M.; Sundseth, K.; Munthe, J.; Kindbom, K.; Wilson, S.; Steenhuisen, F.; Maxson, P. Global Emission of Mercury to the Atmosphere from Anthropogenic Sources in 2005 and Its Future Projection until 2020. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2487–2499. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA Regulatory impact analysis for the final mercury and air toxics standards. EPA-452/R, Washington, DC, 2011; 1–510. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patra, M.; Sharma, A. Mercury Toxicity in Plants. Bot. Rev. 2000, 66, 379–422. DOI: 10.1007/BF02868923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, S.; Arnoux, A.; Cerdan, P.; Reynouard, C.; Horeau, V. Hg Levels of Soils, Sediments and Fish in French Guiana, South America. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2000, 124, 221–244. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005251016314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Penalosa, J. M.; Esteban, E.; Carpena Ruiz, R. O. Mercury Accumulation and Resistance to Mercury Stress in Rumex Induratus Marrubium Vulgare Grown in Perlite. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170, 485–494. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200625238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. R.; Han, Y. J.; Holsen, T. M.; Yi, S. M. Atmospheric Particulate Mercury: concentrations and Size Distributions. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 61, 94–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone, N.; Cinnirella, S.; Feng, X.; Finkelman, R. B.; Friedli, H. R.; Leaner, J.; Mason, R.; Mukherjee, A. B.; Stracher, G. B.; Streets, D. G.; Telmer, K. Global Mercury Emissions to the Atmosphere from Anthropogenic and Natural Sources. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 5951–5964. DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath, K. C.; Zygarlicke, C. J. Mercury Transformations in Coal Combustion Flue Gas. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 65, 289–310. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00102-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath, K. C.; Zygarlicke, C. J.; Olson, E. S.; Pavlish, J. H.; Toman, D. L. Evaluation of Mercury Transformation Mechanisms in a Laboratory-Scale Combustion System. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 261, 149–155. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00637-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. E.; Theodorakos, P. M.; Fey, D. L.; Krabbenhoft, D. P. Mercury Concentrations and Distribution in Soil, Water, Mine Waste Leachates, and Air in and around Mercury Mines in the Big Bend Region, Texas, USA. Environ. Geochem. Health 2015, 37, 35–48. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-014-9628-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari, M. M.; Inoue, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Yokota, K.; Isrun, I. Assessing a Mercury Affected Area from Small-Scale Gold Mining in Poboya, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. EER. 2016, 4, 223–230. DOI: 10.13189/eer.2016.040406.
   Google Scholar
• Kostova, I. J.; Hower, J. C.; Mastalerz, M.; Vassilev, S. V. Mercury Capture by Selected Bulgarian Fly Ashes: influence of Coal Rank and Fly Ash Carbon Pore Structure on Capture Efficiency. Appl. Geochem. 2011, 26, 18–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworska, H.; Dąbrowska-Naskręt, H.; Różański, S. Total Content of Mercury in Arable Soils in the Vicinity of Lafarge-Cement Poland SA Plant (“Kujawy” Bielawy). Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2009, 16, 1299–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y.; Jensen, D.; Windelin, C.; Jensen, F. Review of Technologies for Mercury Removal from Flue Gas from Cement Production Processes. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 599–629. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, C. L.; Duan, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Yao, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, X. Mercury Transformation across Particulate Control Devices in Six Power Plants of China: The co-Effect of Chlorine and Ash Composition. Fuel 2007, 86, 603–610. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.; Wong, M. H. Environmental Mercury Contamination in China: sources and Impacts. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 108–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, H.; Hu, Y. Mercury in Municipal Solid Waste in China and Its Control: A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 593–605. DOI: 10.1021/es2026517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolinska, B. Green Waste Compost as an Amendment during Induced Phytoextraction of Mercury-Contaminated Soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3528–3537. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3601-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Z. H.; Tang, Q. H.; Liu, C.; Wang, W. H.; Zhuang, M.; Lin, Y. M. Distribution and Ecological Effect of Mercury in Laogang Landfill, Shanghai, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19, 200–204. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60032-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Fan, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, T.; Hack, P.; Chan, C. C.; Liou, J. C.; Pan, W. P. Mercury Emissions during Cofiring of Sub-Bituminous Coal and Biomass (Chicken Waste, Wood, Coffee Residue, and Tobacco Stalk) in a Laboratory Scale Fluidized Bed Combustor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 9378–9384. DOI: 10.1021/es8016107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. B.; Zevenhoven, R.; Bhattacharya, P.; Sajwan, K. S.; Kikuchi, R. Mercury Flow via Coal and Coal Utilization Byproducts: A Global Perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2008, 52, 571–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyta, H.; Rogula-Kozłowska, W. Size Distribution of Particulate Mercury by the Roads and in the Urban Background Conditions – Preliminary Study. Sci. Rev. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2014, 63, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tucaliuc, O. M.; Cretescu, I.; Nemtoi, G.; Breaban, I. G.; Soreanu, G.; Iancu, O. I. Monitoring of Mercury from Air and Urban Dust in the Industrial Area of Iasi Municipality. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2014, 13, 20151–22061. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2014.228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gworek, B.; Dmuchowski, W.; Gozdowski, D.; Koda, E.; Osiecka, R.; Borzyszkowski, J. Influence of a Municipal Waste Landfill on the Spatial Distribution of Mercury in the Environment. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0133130–12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meij, R.; Vredenbregt, L. H. J.; Te Winkel, H. The Fate and Behavior of Mercury in Coal-fired Power Plants . J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2002, 52, 912–917. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470833.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hławiczka, S.; Kubica, K.; Zielonka, U. Partitioning Factor of Mercury during Coal Combustion in Low Capacity Domestic Heating Units. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 312, 261–265. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00252-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlish, J. H.; Sondreal, E. A.; Mann, M. D.; Olson, E. S.; Galbreath, K. C.; Laudal, D. L.; Benson, S. A. Status Review of Mercury Control Options for Coal-Fired Power Plants. Fuel Process. Technol. 2003, 82, 89–165. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00059-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.; Seo, Y.; Jang, H.; Park, K.; Baek, J.; An, H.; Song, K. Speciation and Mass Distribution of Mercury in a Bituminous Coal-Fired Power Plant. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 2215–2224. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, T.; Lani, B.; Offen, G. Mechanism Governing the Fate of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Systems. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 139–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Y. V.; Pessione, G. F. A Three-Year Assessment of Mercury Mass Balance from Lambton™s Coal Fired Boilers Equipped with FGD and SC. Paper Presented at the EPA-DOE-EPRI-A&WMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control “Mega” Symposium 2006, Aug 28–31, 2008, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, vol. 1 pp 361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. X.; Zhang, L.; Li, G. H.; Wu, Y.; Hao, J. M.; Pirrone, N.; Sprovieri, F.; Ancora, M. P. Mercury Emission and Speciation of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 1183–1192. DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-1183-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmistrz, P.; Kogut, K. Mercury in Bituminous Coal Used in Polish Power Plants. Arch. Min. Sci. 2016, 61, 473–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCEM National Centre for Emissions Management Institute of Environmental Protection – National Research Institute, The National Centre for Emissions Management, 2015, p 76.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Gamarra, R.; Carpena-Ruiz, R. O.; Millán, R.; Peñalosa, J. M.; Esteban, E. Mercury Bioaccumulation and Phytotoxicity in Two Wild Plant Species of Almadén Area. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 1969–1973. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.; Yang, Z. M. Mercury Toxicity, Molecular Response and Tolerance in Higher Plants. Biometals 2012, 25, 847–857. DOI: 10.1007/s10534-012-9560-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obrist, D. Atmospheric Mercury Pollution Due to Losses of Terrestrial Carbon Pools? Biogeochemistry 2007, 85, 119–123. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-007-9108-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dago, A.; González, I.; Ariño, C.; Martínez-Coronado, A.; Higueras, P.; Díaz-Cruz, J. M.; Esteban, M. Evaluation of Mercury Stress in Plants from the Almadén Mining District by Analysis of Phytochelatins and Their Hg Complexes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6256–6263. DOI: 10.1021/es405619y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbak, Z. Application of Sorbents in the Process of Soil Remediation. Chemia, Dydaktyka, Ekologia, Metrologia 2010, 15, 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rolka, E.; Grzybowski, Ł.; Ciećko, Z.; Szostek, R.; Rachuba, A. Response of yellow lupine to soil contamination with mercury. In Mercury in the Environment – Identifying Threats for Human Health; Falkowska, L. Ed. University of Gdańsk Publisher: Gdansk, 2013; pp 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Heeraman, D. A.; Claassen, V. P.; Zasoski, R. J. Interaction of Lime, Organic Matter and Fertilizer on Growth and Uptake of Arsenic and Mercury by Zorro Fescue (Vulpia myuros L.). Plant Soil 2001, 234, 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciećko, Z.; Rolka, E.; Opęchowska, M.; Grzybowski, Ł. Response of Maize to Soil Contamination with Mercury. Ocean Hydrobiol. Stud. 2007, 36, 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Andrzejewska, A.; Diatta, J.; Spiżewski, T.; Krzesiński, W.; Smurzyńska, A. Application of Zeolite and Bentonite for Stabilizing Lead in a Contaminated Soil. Inż Ekolog. 2017, 18, 1–6. DOI: 10.12912/23920629/74950.
   Google Scholar
• Stentiford, M. J. Polished Performers - Minerals in Frits and Glazes. Ind. Minerals 2004, 438, 54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Tiessen, H.; Moir, J. O. Total and organic carbon. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis Carter, M.R. Ed. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, 1993; pp 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Machul, M. Use of the SPAD Test to Determine a Supplementary Nitrogen Rate for Maize. Pamiętnik Puławski 2005, 140, 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Nurzhanova, A.; Pidlisnyuk, V.; Abit, K.; Nurzhanov, C.; Kenessov, B.; Stefanovska, T.; Erickson, L. Comparative Assessment of Using Miscanthus × Giganteus for Remediation of Soils Contaminated by Heavy Metals: A Case of Military and Mining Sites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 13320–13333. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04707-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikandan, R.; Sahi, S. V.; Venkatachalam, P. Impact Assessment of Mercury Accumulation and Biochemical and Molecular Response of Mentha arvensis: A Potential Hyperaccumulator Plant. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 1–10. DOI: 10.1155/2015/715217.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z. S.; Huang, S. Q.; Guo, K.; Mehta, S. K.; Zhang, P. C.; Yang, Z. M. Metabolic Adaptations to Mercury-Induced Oxidative Stress in Roots of Medicago sativa L. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007, 101, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radecka, I.; Wesołowski, M. Concentration and Distribution of Mercury in Rhizomes and Roots of Medicinal Plants [l:] III; IOŚ: Warsaw: 2005; pp 337–341.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R.; Rodriguez, E. Phytotoxicity of Mercury in Plants. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 1–6. DOI: 10.1155/2012/848614.
   Google Scholar
• Spiak, Z.; Romanowska, M.; Radoła, J. The Content in Soils Toxic to Different Species of Cultivated Plants. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 2000, 471, 1125–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari, M. K. A.; Ahmad, A.; Umar, S.; Iqbal, M. Mercury-Induced Changes in Growth Variables and Antioxidative Enzyme Activities in Indian Mustard. J. Plant Interact 2009, 4, 131–136. DOI: 10.1080/17429140802716713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rellán-Álvarez, R.; Ortega-Villasante, C.; Álvarez-Fernández, A.; Del Campo, F. F.; Hernández, L. E. Stress Responses of Zea Mays to Cadmium and Mercury. Plant Soil 2006, 279, 41–50. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-3900-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathe‐Gaspar, G.; Szili‐Kovacs, T.; Takacs, T.; Mathe, P.; Anton, A. Environmental Impact of Soil Pollution with Toxic Elements from the Lead and Zinc Mine at Gyöngyösoroszi (Hungary). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2009, 40, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, K.; Murariu, M.; Molnar, R.; Schlosser, G.; Cecal, A.; Drochiiu, G. Effect of Radioactive and Non-Radioactive Mercury on Wheat Germination and the anti-Toxic Role of Glutathione. Isotopes Environ. Health Stud. 2007, 43, 105–116. DOI: 10.1080/10256010701362112.
   Google Scholar
• Ciećko, Z.; Rolka, E.; Najmowicz, T.; Archacka, A.; Grzybowski, Ł. Response of Potato to Soil Contamination with Mercury Neutralised with Soil Improving Substances. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2009, 16, 523–530.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, J.; Kleja, D. B.; Biester, H.; Lagerkvist, A.; Kumpiene, J. Influence of Particle Size Distribution, Organic Carbon, pH and Chlorides on Washing of Mercury Contaminated Soil. Chemosphere 2014, 109, 99–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. K.; Zhang, C.; Shi, X. J.; Lin, T.; Wang, D. Y. Effect of Organic Matter and pH on Mercury Release from Soils. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2007, 19, 1349–1354. DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(07)60220-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushenkov, V.; Kumar Nanda, P. B. A.; Motto, H.; Raskin, I. Rhizofiltration: The Use of Plants to Remove Heavy Metals from Aqueous Streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 1239–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericksen, J. A.; Gustin, M. S.; Schorran, D. E.; Johnson, D. W.; Lindberg, S. E.; Coleman, J. S. Accumulation of Atmospheric Mercury in Forest Foliage. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1613–1622. DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00008-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suszcynsky, E. M.; Shann, J. R. Phytotoxicity and Accumulation of Mercury in Tobacco Subjected to Different Exposure Routes. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1995, 14, 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, F. N.; Anderson, C. W. N.; Stewart, R. B.; Robinson, B. H.; Ghomshei, M.; Meech, J. A. Induced Plant Uptake and Transport of Mercury in the Presence of Sulphur-Containing Ligands and Humic Acid. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 445–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01361.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y.; Han, F. X.; Chen, J.; Sridhar, B. B. M.; Monts, D. L. Phytoextraction and Accumulation of Mercury in Three Plant Species: Indian Mustard (Brassica Juncea), Beard Grass (Polypogon monospeliensis), and Chinese Brake Fern (Pteris vittata). Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2008, 10, 547–560. DOI: 10.1080/15226510802115091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagajyoti, P. C.; Lee, K. D.; Sreekanth, T. V. M. Heavy Metals, Occurrence and Toxicity for Plants: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2010, 8, 199–216. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó, L.; Fodor, L. Uptake of Microelements by Crops Grown on Heavy Metal – Amended Soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2006, 37, 2679–2689. DOI: 10.1080/00103620600830070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L.; Rincón, J.; Asencio, I.; Rodriguez-Castellanos, L. Capability of Selected Crop Plants for Shoot Mercury Accumulation from Polluted Soils: phytoremediation Perspectives. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2007, 9, 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/15226510601139359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek, W.; Tkaczyk, P.; Dresler, S. Heavy Metals Contents as a Criterion for Assessment of Winter Wheat Grain Quality. Acta Agrophys. 2008, 12, 315–326.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu, G. K.; Upadhyay, S.; Sahoo, B. B. Mercury Induced Phytotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plants. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2012, 18, 21–31. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-011-0090-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patra, M.; Bhowmik, N.; Bandopadhyay, B.; Sharma, A. Comparison of Mercury, Lead and Arsenic with respect to Genotoxic Effects on Plant Systems and the Development of Genetic Tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004, 52, 199–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar