References
- Szinicz, L. History of Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents. Toxicology 2005, 214, 167–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.06.011.
- Chauhan, S.; Chauhan, S.; D'Cruz, R.; Faruqi, S.; Singh, K. K.; Varma, S.; Singh, M.; Karthik, V. Chemical Warfare Agents. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 26, 113–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2008.03.003.
- Evison, D.; Hinsley, D.; Rice, P. Regular Review: Chemical Weapons. BMJ. 2002, 324, 332–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7333.332.
- Singh, S. K.; Klein, J. A.; Wright, H. N.; Tewari-Singh, N. Phosgene Oxime: A Highly Toxic Urticant and Emerging Chemical Threat. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2021, 31, 288–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2020.1861670.
- Khateri, S.; Ghanei, M.; Keshavarz, S.; Soroush, M.; Haines, D. Incidence of Lung, Eye, and Skin Lesions as Late Complications in 34,000 Iranians with Wartime Exposure to Mustard Agent. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2003, 45, 1136–1143.
- Hashemian, F.; Khoshnood, K.; Desai, M. M.; Falahati, F.; Kasl, S.; Southwick, S. Anxiety, Depression, and Posttraumatic Stress in Iranian Survivors of Chemical Warfare. JAMA 2006, 296, 560–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.5.560.
- Ross, S. M. Introduction to Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Academic Press, New York, 2014.
- Ross, S. M. A Problem in Optimal Search and Stop. Oper. Res. 1969, 17, 984–992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.17.6.984.
- Zeng, S.; Chen, S. M.; Kuo, L. W. Multiattribute Decision Making Based on Novel Score Function of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values and Modified VIKOR Method. Inf. Sci. 2019, 488, 76–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.03.018.
- Shea, D. A.; Gottron, F. Ricin: Technical Background and Potential Role in Terrorism. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2010.
- Certini, G.; Scalenghe, R.; Woods, W. I. The Impact of Warfare on the Soil Environment. Earth. Sci. Rev. 2013, 127, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.009.
- Kress, M.; Lin, K. Y.; Szechtman, R. Optimal Discrete Search with Imperfect Specificity. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 2008, 68, 539–549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-007-0197-2.
- Sadi-Nezhad, S.; Sotoudeh-Anvari, A.; Khalili-Damghani, K. A Fuzzy Optimal Search Approach: Real Applications in Crisis and Mine Detection. IJMDM 2014, 13, 318–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2014.063574.
- Song, N. O.; Teneketzi, D. Discrete Search with Multiple Sensors. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 2004, 60, 1–13.
- Koopman, B. The Theory of Search, II. Target Detection. Oper. Res. 1956, 4, 324–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.4.5.503.
- Matula, D. A Periodic Optimal Search. Am. Math. Mon. 1964, 71, 15–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2311296.
- Black, W. L. Discrete Sequential Search. Inf. Control. 1965, 8, 159–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90052-5.
- Chew, M. C. A Sequential Search Procedure. Ann. Math. Statist. 1967, 38, 494–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177698965.
- Kadane, J. B. Discrete Search and the Neyman-Pearson Lemma. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1968, 22, 156–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(68)90167-4.
- Pollock, S. M. Search Detection and Subsequent Action: Some Problems on the Interfaces. Oper. Res. 1971, 19, 559–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.19.3.559.
- Abd Allah El-Hadidy, M. The Searching Algorithm for Detecting a Markovian Target Based on Maximizing the Discounted Effort Reward Search. J. Egypt Math. Soc. 2020, 28, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-020-00097-1.
- Clarkson, J.; Glazebrook, K. D.; Lin, K. Y. Fast or Slow: Search in Discrete Locations with Two Search Modes. Oper. Res. 2020, 68, 552–571.
- Stone, L. D. Theory of Optimal Search. Elsevier, New York, 1976.
- Washburn, A. R. Search and Detection. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, Linthicum, 2002.
- Benkoski, S. J.; Monticino, M. G.; Weisinger, J. R. A Survey of the Search Theory Literature. Nav. Res. Logist. 1991, 38, 469–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199108)38:4<469::AID-NAV3220380404>3.0.CO;2-E.
- Bellman, R. Dynamic Programming. Science 1966, 153, 34–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3731.34.
- Lazarev, A. A.; Werner, F. A. Graphical Realization of the Dynamic Programming Method for Solving NP-Hard Combinatorial Problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 619–631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.06.008.
- Arruda, E.; Fragoso, M.; do Val, J. B. R. Approximate Dynamic Programming via Direct Search in the Space of Value Function Approximations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 211, 343–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.019.
- Cervellera, C.; Chen, V. C. P.; Wen, A. Optimization of a Large Scale Water Reservoir Network by Stochastic Dynamic Programming with Efficient State Space Discretization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 171, 1139–1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.022.
- Sotoudeh-Anvari, A.; Sadjadi, S. J.; Molana, S. H.; Sadi-Nezhad, S. A Stochastic Multi-Objective Model Based on the Classical Optimal Search Model for Searching for the People Who Are Lost in Response Stage of Earthquake. Sci. Iran. Trans. E Indus. Eng. 2019, 26, 1842–1864.
- Alkaabneh, F.; Diabat, A.; Gao, H. O. A Unified Framework for Efficient, Effective, and Fair Resource Allocation by Food Banks Using an Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach. Omega 2021, 100, 102300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102300.
- Silva, T. A.; de Souza, M. C. Surgical Scheduling under Uncertainty by Approximate Dynamic Programming. Omega 2020, 95, 102066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.05.002.
- Ayele, W. T.; Tenagashaw, D. Y.; Belew, A. Z.; Andualem, T. G. Optimal Water Allocation under Climate Change, Based on Stochastic Dynamic Programming Model Approach in Ribb Reservoir, Amhara, Ethiopia. Water Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2022, 7, 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-021-00125-w.
- Deng, Q.; Santos, B. F.; Curran, R. A Practical Dynamic Programming Based Methodology for Aircraft Maintenance Check Scheduling Optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020, 281, 256–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.025.
- Gökalp, E.; Cakir, M. S.; Kougkoulos, I. Capacity Management of Migrant Accommodation Centers Using Approximate Dynamic Programming. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2021, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1907242.
- Puterman, M. L. Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2014.
- Cheng, T. C. E.; Kriheli, B.; Levner, E.; Ng, C. T. Scheduling an Autonomous Robot Searching for Hidden Targets. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 298, 95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03141-1.
- Sotoudeh-Anvari, A.; Sadjadi, S.; Molana, S.; Sadi-Nezhad, S. A New MCDM-Based Approach Using BWM and SAW for Optimal Search Model. Decis. Sci. Lett. 2018, 7, 395–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2018.2.001.
- Akram, M.; Kahraman, C.; Zahid, K. Group Decision-Making Based on Complex Spherical Fuzzy VIKOR Approach. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2021, 216, 106793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106793.
- Zeleny, M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Eight Concepts of Optimality. HSM 1998, 17, 97–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-1998-17203.
- Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 156, 445–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
- Yang, W.; Pang, Y. Hesitant Interval‐Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy VIKOR Method. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2019, 34, 754–789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22075.
- Rani, P.; Jain, D.; Hooda, D. S. Shapley Function Based Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy VIKOR Technique for Correlative Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 15, 25–54.
- Abdel-Basset, M.; Zhou, Y.; Mohamed, M.; Chang, V. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic VIKOR Approach for E-Government Website Evaluation. IFS 2018, 34, 4213–4224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-171952.
- Mousavi-Nasab, S. H.; Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. A New Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Sustainable Material Selection Problem: A Critical Study on Rank Reversal Problem. J. Cleaner Prod. 2018, 182, 466–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.062.
- Yue, C. Normalization of Attribute Values with Interval Information in Group Decision-Making Setting: With an Application to Software Quality Evaluation. J. Exp. Theoret. Artif. Intell. 2019, 31, 475–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2019.1572655.
- Zhou, P.; Ang, B. W. Comparing MCDA Aggregation Methods in Constructing Composite Indicators Using the Shannon-Spearman Measure. Soc. Indic. Res. 2009, 94, 83–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9338-0.
- Karande, P.; Gauri, S. K.; Chakraborty, S. Applications of Utility Concept and Desirability Function for Materials Selection. Mater. Des. 2013, 45, 349–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.067.
- Kang, D.; Park, Y. Review-Based Measurement of Customer Satisfaction in Mobile Service: Sentiment Analysis and VIKOR Approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 1041–1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.101.
- Yücenur, G. N.; Demirel, N. C. Group Decision Making Process Insurance Company Selection Problem with Extended VIKOR Method under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 3702–3707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.065.
- Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. A Critical Review on Theoretical Drawbacks and Mathematical Incorrect Assumptions in Fuzzy or Methods: Review from 2010 to 2020. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 93, 106354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106354.
- Zadeh, L. A. Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8, 338–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
- Kahraman, C.; Onar, S. C.; Oztaysi, B. Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2015, 8, 637–666.
- Sharaf, I. M. Supplier Selection Using a Flexible Interval-Valued Fuzzy VIKOR. Granul. Comput. 2020, 5, 485–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00169-3.
- Ding, X. F.; Liu, H. C. An Extended Prospect Theory–VIKOR Approach for Emergency Decision Making with 2-Dimension Uncertain Linguistic Information. Soft Comput. 2019, 23, 12139–12150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04092-2.
- Gul, M.; Ak, M. F.; Guneri, A. F. Pythagorean Fuzzy VIKOR-Based Approach for Safety Risk Assessment in Mine Industry. J. Saf. Res. 2019, 69, 135–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.005.
- Liang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Jamaldeen, A. Pythagorean Fuzzy VIKOR Approaches Based on TODIM for Evaluating Internet Banking Website Quality of Ghanaian Banking Industry. Appl. Soft Comput. 2019, 78, 583–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.006.
- Wang, H.; Pan, X.; He, S. A New Interval Type-2 Fuzzy VIKOR Method for Multi-Attribute Decision Making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 21, 145–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0527-y.
- Ju, Y.; Wang, A. Extension of VIKOR Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problem with Linguistic Information. Appl. Math. Modell. 2013, 37, 3112–3125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.035.
- Büyüközkan, G.; Göçer, F.; Karabulut, Y. A New Group Decision Making Approach with IF AHP and IF VIKOR for Selecting Hazardous Waste Carriers. Measurement 2019, 134, 66–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.041.
- Sanayei, A.; Mousavi, S. F.; Yazdankhah, A. Group Decision Making Process for Supplier Selection with VIKOR under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 24–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.063.
- Opricovic, S. Fuzzy VIKOR with an Application to Water Resources Planning. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 12983–12990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097.
- Chen, S. M.; Hsiao, W. H.; Horng, Y. J. A Knowledge-Based Method for Fuzzy Query Processing for Document Retrieval. Cybern. Syst. 1997, 28, 99–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/019697297126272.
- Huang, J. J.; Tzeng, G. H.; Liu, H. H. A Revised VIKOR Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making-the Perspective of Regret Theory. In Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, edited by Yong Shi, Shouyang Wang, Yi Peng, Jianping Li, Yong Zeng, 2009; Springer, Chengdu/Jiuzhaigou, China, pp 761–768.
- Chatterjee, P.; Chakraborty, S. A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR Method and Its Variants. Decis. Sci. Lett. 2016, 5, 469–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.5.004.
- Mousavi-Nasab, S. H.; Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. An Extension of Best-Worst Method with D Numbers: Application in Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2020, 40, 100771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100771.
- Liu, H. C.; Shi, H.; Li, Z.; Duan, C. Y. An Integrated Behavior Decision-Making Approach for Large Group Quality Function Deployment. Inf. Sci. 2022, 582, 334–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.020.
- Liu, Z.; Mou, X.; Liu, H. C.; Zhang, L. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Preference Relations and Gained and Lost Dominance Score Method. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2021, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3105742
- Fei, L.; Deng, Y.; Hu, Y. DS-VIKOR: A New Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Supplier Selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 21, 157–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0543-y.