AERMOD performance evaluation for three coal-fired electrical generating units in Southwest Indiana

References

• American Society for Testing and Materials . 2010 . Standard Guide for Statistical Evaluation of Atmospheric Dispersion Model Performance, D6589-05 , West Conshohocken , PA : American Society for Testing and Materials .
   Google Scholar
• Brode , R. May 2007 . AERMET Training Class , May , New London , CT : Presented by EPA, OAQPS, Air Quality Modeling Group to the NESCAUM Permit Modeling Committee, Annual Meeting . 31
   Google Scholar
• Chang , J.C. and Hanna , S.R. 2004 . Air quality model performance evaluation . Meteorol. Atmos. Phys , 87 ( 1–3 ) : 167 – 196 . doi: 10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman , L. 2011 . Ambient Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations in Northwest Indiana in 2008: A Comparison Study of Monitored Values and AERMOD Predicted Values , Porter , IN : OCS Environmental .
   Google Scholar
• Cox , W.M. and Tikvart , J.A. 1990 . A statistical procedure for determining the best performing air quality simulation model . Atmos.Environ , 24A(9) : 2387 – 2395 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresser , A. and Huizer , R. 2011 . CALPUFF and AERMOD model validation study in the near field: Martins Creek revisited . J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc , 61 : 647 – 659 . doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal , P. and Krishna , R. 2002 . Dispersion of pollutants in convective low wind: A case study of Delhi . Atmos. Environ , 36 : 2071 – 2079 . doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna , S.R. 2007 . “ A review of uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of atmospheric transport and dispersion models ” . In Developments in Environmental Science 6 , Edited by: Borrego , C. , Renner , E. , Modeling , Air Pollution and XVIII , Its Application . 331 – 349 . Oxford , UK : Elsevier . Ined.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna , S. , Egan , B. and Paine , B. 2012 . API comments on EPA air dispersion modeling. Presented at the 10th EPA Modeling Conference , 13 – 15 . NC : Research Triangle Park . March
   Google Scholar
• Kumar , A. , Dixit , S. , Varadarajan , C. , Vijayan , A. and Masuraha , A. 2006 . Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area . Environ. Prog , 25 : 141 – 151 . doi: 10.1002/ep.10129
   Google Scholar
• Paine , R. , Connors , J. and Szembek , C. 2012 . AERMOD low wind speed evaluation study. Presented at the 10th EPA Modeling Conference , 13 – 15 . NC : Research Triangle Park . March
   Google Scholar
• Paine , R.J. , Lee , R.F. , Brode , R. , Wilson , R.B. , Cimorelli , A.J. , Perry , S.G. , Weil , J.C. , Venkatram , A. and Peters , W.D. 1998 . Model evaluation results for AERMOD (draft document) , http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/aermod/evalrep.pdf (accessed June 15, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Perry , S.G. , Cimorelli , A.J. , Paine , R.J. , Brode , R.W. , Weil , J.C. , Venkatram , A. , Wilson , R.B. , Lee , R.F. and Peters , W.D. 2005 . AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: Model performance against 17 field study databases . J. Appl. Meteorol , 44 : 694 – 708 . doi: 10.1175/JAM2228.1
   Google Scholar
• Qian , W. and Venkatram , A. 2011 . Performance of steady-state dispersion models under low wind- speed conditions . Boundary Layer Meteorol , 138 : 475 – 491 . doi: 10.1007/s10546-010-9565-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models . 2005 . Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain) Dispersion Model and Other Revisions; Final Rule . Code of Federal Regulations , Title 40, Pt. 51, App. W
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Addendum: User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model—AERMOD.accessed July 30, 2013). http://www.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm (http://www.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Regional Meteorological Data Processing Protocol, EPA Region 5 and States (draft). May 6accessed July 30, 2013). http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=17386 (http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=17386)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. AERMOD Model Change Bulletin: MCB#8accessed May 1, 2013). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/models/aermod/aermod_mcb8.txt (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/models/aermod/aermod_mcb8.txt)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. List of Designated Reference and Equivalent Methods. U.S. EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory. June 27. Research Triangle Park, NCaccessed July 30, 2013). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/criteria.html (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/criteria.html)
   Google Scholar