A model for interprovincial air pollution control based on futures prices

References

• Bertsekas, D.P. 1999. Nonlinear Programming, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Athena Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Brigham, E.F., and M.C. Ehrhardt.2011. Financial Management: Theory and Practice. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Boutabba, M.A., O. Beaumais, and S. Lardic. 2012. Permit price dynamics in the U.S. SO2 trading program: A cointegration approach. Energy Econ. 34: 714–722.doi:10.1016%2Fj.eneco.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao D., C.Y. Song, J.N. Wang, H.Q. Jiang, W.X. Li, and G.Z. Cao. 2009. Pollutant reduction cost function of the establishment of joint and empirical analysis [in Chinese]. Res. Environ. Sci. 22: 371–376.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona R., M. Fehr, and J. Hinz 2009. Optimal stochastic control and carbon price formation. SIAM J. Control Optimiz. 48:2168–2190. doi:10.1137%2F080736910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, B., and K.R., French 1983. The pricing of stock index futures. J. Futures Markets 3:1–14. doi:10.1002%2Ffut.3990030102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curiel, I. 1997. Cooperative Game Theory and Applications: Cooperative Games Arising from Combinatorial Optimization Problems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Dales J.H. 1968. Property and Prices. An Essay in Policy-Making and Economics. Toronto: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fang H., and Z. Ma 2008. SO2 emissions trading practice in the United States of enlightenment to China [in Chinese]. J. Nanchang Univ. Humanities Soc. Sci. 9:72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Fenger, J. 2009. Air pollution in the last 50 years–From local to global. Atmos. Environ. 43:13–22. doi:10.1016%2Fj.atmosenv.2008.09.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaurav G., and J. Shortle 2012. Managing Pollution Risk through Emissions Trading. E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN) Working Paper No. 1. Aachen, Germany: E.ON Energy Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Germain M., P. Toint, H. Tulkens, and A. de Zeeuw. 2003. Transfers to sustain dynamic core theoretic cooperation in international stock pollutant control. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 28:79–99. doi:1016%2FS0165-1889%2802%2900107-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkos G.E. 1993. Sulphur abatement policy: Implications of cost differentials. Energy Policy 1:1035–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkos G.E. 1994. Optimal abatement of sulphur in Europe. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4:127–150. doi:10.1007%2FBF00692200
   Google Scholar
• Halkos G.E. 1996. Incomplete information in the acid rain game. Empirica 23:129–148. doi:10.1007%2FBF00925336
   Google Scholar
• Hu M. 2007. Shadow price of emission rights pricing model. Prices Monthly 374:18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Huang T.C., C.J. Huang, and S.D. Li 2007. Optimal timing of implementation of the emissions trading system for decision-making model [in Chinese]. J. Syst. Manage. 16:422–425.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen S., and G. Zaccour 2001. Time consistent side payments in a dynamic game of downstream pollution. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 25:1973–1987. doi:10.1016%2FS0165-1889%2800%2900013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczyk J. 2005. Coupled constraint Nash equilibria in environmental games. Resour. Energy Econ. 27:157–181. doi:10.1016%2Fj.reseneeco.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milunovich G., and R. Joyeux 2007. Testing Market Efficiency and Price Discovery in European Carbon Markets. Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia: Department of Economics, Macquarie University.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, N.Z., and R., Mendelsohn 2009. Efficient pollution regulation: Getting the prices right. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:1714–1739. doi:10.1257%2Faer.99.5.1714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanam R., and Y. Narahari 2010. A shapley value-based approach to discover influential nodes in social networks. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 99:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Okay, N., and U., Akman 2010. Analysis of ESCO activities using country indicators. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14:2760–2771. doi:10.1016%2Fj.rser.2010.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolella M S, and T. Luca 2008. An econometric analysis of emission allowance prices. J. Bank. Finance 32:2022–2032. doi:10.1016%2Fj.jbankfin.2007.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosendahl K.E. 2008. Incentives and prices in an emissions trading scheme with updating. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 56:69–82. doi:10.1016%2Fj.jeem.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, A.E. 1988. The Shapley Value: Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauma, E.E. 2011. Valuation of the economic impact of the initial allocation of tradable emission permits in air pollution control. J. Energy Eng. 137:11–20. doi:10.1061%2F%28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talinli, I., E., Topuz, and M.Uygar Akbay, 2010. Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs): Sustainable energy futures for Turkey. Energy Policy 38:4479–4488. doi:10.1016%2Fj.enpol.2010.03.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1979. Press release: “Bubble” Policy Added to EPA’s Cleanup Strategy. December 3, 1979. http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/bubble-policy-added-epas-cleanup-strategy (accessed January 28, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wang L.Z., and Y. Song 2009. On carbon trading, financial innovation and risk prevention [in Chinese]. Modern Finance Econ. 29:30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Weishaar S E, and E. Woerdman 2012. Does auctioning emission rights avoid state aid? Empirical evidence from Germany. Carbon Climate Law Rev. 6:114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Y.C., and Y.Z., Wu 2010. The study on the status and the countermeasures of low-carbon financial system of China. Low Carbon Economy 1:71–79. doi:10.4236%2Flce.2010.12009
   Google Scholar
• Wu L. 2007. The theoretical basis of the emission trading system [in Chinese]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 23:497–501.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L.J. 2009. Model of collective cooperation and reallocation of benefits related to conflicts over water pollution across regional boundaries in a Chinese river basin. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24:603–610. doi:10.1016%2Fj.envsoft.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L J, et al. 2012. Model of transfer tax on water pollution across regional boundaries in large-scale river basins: The case of Huaihe River Basin in China. Oper. Res. Lett. 40:218–222. doi:10.1016%2Fj.orl.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Y., et al. 2008. China’s thermal power industry sulfur dioxide emissions trading discussion [in Chinese]. Energy China 12:21–24.
   Google Scholar