Modeled and observed fine particulate matter reductions from state attainment demonstrations

References

• Anderson, J. 2006. Revisiting the SIP process: Finding a better approach to cleaner air. State Bar Texas Environ. Law J. 36:213–222.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, J. 2007. Will the circle be unbroken: A history of the US national ambient air quality standards. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 57: 652–697. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.6.652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, C.L., G.M. Hidy, S. Tanenbaum, E.S. Edgerton, and B.E. Hartsell. 2013. The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) study: Temporal trends in gas and PM concentrations and composition, 1999–2010. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 63:247–259. doi:10.1080/10962247.2012.748523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, D.W., and K.L. Schere. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59: 51–77. doi:10.1115/1.2128636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board. 2007. 2007 State Strategy for California’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Federal PM_2.5 and 8-Hour Ozone Standards. Sacramento, CA: California Air Resources Board.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, M.C., E. Andrews, A. Asmi, U. Baltensperger, N. Bukowiecki, D. Day, M. Fiebig, A. M. Fjaeraa, H. Flentje, A. Hyvärinen, et al. 2013. Aerosol decadal trends—Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13:869–894. doi:10.5194/acp-13-869-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockery, D.W., C.A. Pope, X.P. Xu, J.D. Spengler, J.H. Ware, M.E. Fay, B.G. Ferris, and F.E. Speizer. 1993. An association between air pollution and mortality in 6 United States cities. N. Engl. J. Med. 329:1753–1759. doi:10.1056/nejm199312093292401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENVIRON. 2010. User’s Guide—Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions Version 5.30. Novato, CA: ENVIRON International Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, J.D., and D. Owen. 2005. Technocracy and democracy: Conflicts between models and participation in environmental law and planning. Hastings Law J. 56:901–981.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, J.L., B.A. Schichtel, W.C. Malm, and N.H. Frank. 2013. Spatial and temporal trends in PM2.5 organic and elemental carbon across the United States. Adv. Meteorol. 2013. doi:36767410.1155/2013/367674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J.M., C. Hogrefe, R.F. Henry, J.Y. Ku, and G. Sistla. 2005. An assessment of the sensitivity and reliability of the relative reduction factor approach in the development of 8-hr ozone attainment plans. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 55:13–19. doi:10.1080/10473289.2005.10464601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2004. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pegues, A.H., D.S. Cohan, A. Digar, C. Douglass, and R.S. Wilson. 2012. Efficacy of recent state implementation plans for 8-hour ozone. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62:252–261. doi:10.1080/10473289.2011.646049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C.A., and D.W. Dockery. 2006. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 56:709–742. doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, P.M. 2005. Multipollutant efficiency standards for electricity production. Contemp. Econ. Policy 23: 341–356. doi:10.1093/cep/byi026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sistla, G., C. Hogrefe, W. Hao, J.Y. Ku, E. Zalewsky, R.F. Henry, and K. Civerolo. 2004. An operational assessment of the application of the relative reduction factors in the demonstration of attainment of the 8-hr ozone national ambient air quality standard. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 54:950–959. doi:10.1080/10473289.2004.10470964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. NO_x budget trading programs for state implementation plans. 63 FR 57514, October 27, 1998. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations: 665–707.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Rule to reduce interstate transport of fine particulate matter and ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule). Fed. Regist. 70:25162–25404. 70 FR 25162. https://federalregister.gov/a/05-5723
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Guidance on the use of models and other analyses for demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, PM_2.5, and regional haze. EPA -454/B-07-002. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/final-03-pm-rh-guidance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Our Nation’s Air—Status and Trends Through 2010. EPA-454/R-12-001. http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/2011/.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, J., J. Pleim, R. Mathur, G. Pouliot, C. Hogrefe, C.M. Gan, and C. Wei. 2013. Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13:7531–7549. doi:10.5194/acp-13-7531-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar