A two-step approach for relating tapered element oscillating microbalance and dichotomous air sampler PM_2.5 measurements

References

• Allen, G. 2010. Evaluation of Transformation Methods for Adjusting Historical TEOM Data in the NAPS Network. Prepared for the Analysis and Air Quality Section, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G., C. Sioutas, P. Koutrakis, R. Reiss, F.W. Luhrmann, and P.T. Roberts. 1997. Evaluation of the TEOM® method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 47:682–689. doi:10.1080/10473289.1997.10463923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers, G.P., M.D. Keywood, and J.L. Gras. 1999. TEOM vs. manual gravimetric methods for determination of PM2.5 aerosol mass concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 33:3717–3721. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00125-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada-wide Standards Development Committee for Particulate Matter (PM) and Ozone. 1999. Discussion paper on PM and ozone. Canada-wide Standards Scenarios for Consultation. http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/pmozone_standard_e.pdf (accessed July 24, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Chung, A., D.P.Y. Chang, M.J. Kleeman, K.D. Perry, T.A. Cahill, D. Dutcher, E.M. McDougall, and K. Stroud. 2001. Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 51:109–120. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eatough, D.J., R.W. Long, W.K. Modey, and N.L. Eatough. 2003. Semi-volatile secondary organic aerosol in urban atmospheres: Meeting a measurement challenge. Atmos. Environ. 37:1277–1292. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberly, S., T. Fitz-Simons, T. Hanley, L. Weinstock, T. Tamanini, G. Denniston, B. Lambeth, E. Michel, and S. Bortnick. 2002. Data quality objectives (DQOs) for relating federal reference method (FRM) and continuous PM_2.5 measurements to report an air quality index (AQI). Report no. EPA-454/B-02-002. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, H., A. Berner, B. Gomiscek, S. Stopper, H. Puxbaum, M. Kundi, and O. Preining. 2004. On the equivalence of gravimetric PM data with TEOM and beta-attenuation measurements. Aerosol Sci. 35:1135–1149. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashuba, R., and P.A. Scheff. 2008. Nonlinear regression adjustments of multiple continuous monitoring methods produce effective characterization of short-term fine particulate matter. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58:812–820. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.6.812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M.B., H. Patashnick, J.L. Ambs, and E. Rupprecht. 2000. Development of a sample equilibration system for the TEOM continuous PM monitor. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50:1345–1349. doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patashnick, H., and E.G. Rupprecht. 1991. Continuous PM-10 measurements using the tapered element oscillating microbalance. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 41:1079–1083. doi:10.1080/10473289.1991.10466903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, S.L., A.L. Robinson, A. Khlystov, C.O. Stanier, and S.N. Pandis. 2004. Mass balance closure and the Federal Reference Method for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Atmos. Environ. 38:3305–3318. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M., P.A. Scheff, and W.J. Kaldy. 2003. Adjusting tapered element oscillating microbalance data for comparison with federal reference method PM2.5 measurements in region 5. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 53:596–607. doi:10.1080/10473289.2003.10466196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2011. SAS, Release 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J.J., H.D. Felton, O.V. Rattigan, and K.L. Demerjian. 2006. New York State urban and rural measurements of continuous PM2.5 mass by FDMS, TEOM, and BAM. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 56:372–383. doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofowote, U., Y. Su, M.M. Bitzos, and A. Munoz, A. 2014. Improving the correlations of ambient tapered element oscillating microbalance PM2.5 data and SHARP 5030 Federal Equivalent Method in Ontario: A multiple linear regression analysis. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64: 104–114. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.833145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, R.L., and W.J. Parkhurst. 2000. Chemical composition of fine particles in the Tennessee Valley region. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50:1299–1307. doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega, E., E. Reyes, A. Wellens, G. Sanchez, J.C. Chow, and J.G. Watson. 2003. Comparison of continuous and filter based mass measurements in Mexico City. Atmos. Environ. 37:2783–2973. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00216-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar