Future year ozone source attribution modeling studies for the eastern and western United States

References

• Byun, D., and K.L. Schere. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 59:51–77. doi:10.1115/1.2128636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohan, D.S., A. Hakami, Y. Hu, and A.G. Russell. 2005. Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:6739–6748. doi:10.1021/es048664m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet, S., T. Kidokoro, Y. Sonoda, K. Lohman, P. Karamchandani, S.-Y. Chen, and H. Minoura. 2012. Air quality impacts of motor vehicle emissions in the south coast air basin: Current versus more stringent control scenario, Atmos. Environ. 47:236–240. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet, S., H. Minoura, T. Kidokoro, Y. Sonoda, Y. Kinugasa, and P. Karamchandani. 2014. Evaluation of light-duty vehicle mobile source regulations on ozone concentration trends in 2018 and 2030 in the western and eastern United States. J. Air Waste Manage. 64(2): 175–183. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.845621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunker A.M., G. Yarwood, J.P. Ortmann, and G.M. Wilson. 2002. Comparison of source apportionment and source sensitivity of ozone in a three-dimensional air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:2953–2964. doi:10.1021/es011418f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, C., J. Jung, J. Johnson, G. Yarwood, S. Madronich, and G.Grell. 2010. Improving the Characterization of Clouds and their Impact on Photolysis Rates within the CAMx Photochemical Grid Model. Prepared for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, TX, by ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA ( August 27, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, L.K., S. Walters, P.G. Hess, J.F. Lamarque, G.G. Pfister, D. Fillmore, C. Granier, A. Guenther, D. Kinnison, T. Laepple, J. Orlando, X. Tie, G. Tyndall, C. Wiedinmyer, S.L. Baughcum, and S. Kloster. 2010. Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4). Geosci. Model Dev. 3:43–67. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENVIRON. 2009. User’s Guide Emissions Processor Version 3. Novato, CA: ENVIRON International Corporation, August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• ENVIRON. 2011. Ozone/PM_2.5 Modeling for the Northeastern United States. Final report prepared for Toyota Motor Corporation by ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA, February 2011.
   Google Scholar
• ENVIRON. 2012. Future Year Ozone/PM_2.5 Modeling for the Northeastern and Western United States. Final report prepared for Toyota Motor Corporation by ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA, March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• ENVIRON. 2013. Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) West-wide Jump-start Air Quality Modeling Study (WestJumpAQMS). Final report prepared for the Western Regional Air Partnership by ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA, September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Farooqui, Z.M., J. Kuruvilla, J. Biswas, and N. Sule. 2013. Modeling analysis of the impact of anthropogenic emission sources on ozone concentration over selected urban areas in Texas. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 4:33–42. doi:10.5094/APR.2013.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam, R. 2010. Evaluation of multi-annual CONUS 12 km WRF simulations. http://epa.gov/scram001/adhoc/gilliam2010.pdf ( accessed May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Otte, T.L., and J.E., Pleim. 2010: The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ modeling system: Updates through MCIPv3.4.1, Geosci. Model Dev. 3:243–256. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-243-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM_2.5 and Regional Haze. EPA-454/B-07-002. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, K., G. Yarwood, C. Lindhjem, A. DenBleyker, U. Nopmongcol, J. Grant, E. Tai, T. Sakulyanontvittaya, and J. Johnson, 2012. Estimating the effect of past, present and potential future emission standards for light duty gasoline vehicles on ozone and fine particulate matter in the eastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 60:109–120, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood, G., R.E. Morris, M.A. Yocke, H. Hogo, and T. Chico. 1996. Development of a methodology for source apportionment of ozone concentration estimates from a photochemical grid model. Presented at the 89th AWMA Annual Meeting, Nashville TN, June 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., J.R. Brook, and R. Vet. 2003. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3:2067–2082. doi:10.5194/acp-3-2067-2003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., S. Gong, J. Padro, and L. Barrie. 2001. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos. Environ. 35:549–560. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00326-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar