U.S. National PM_2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Networks—CSN and IMPROVE: Description of networks

References

• Ashbaugh, L.L., and R.A. Eldred. 2004a. Loss of particle nitrate from Teflon sampling filters: Effects on measured gravimetric mass in California and in the IMPROVE Network. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 54(1): 93–104. doi:10.1080/10473289.2004.10470878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh, L.L., C.E. McDade, W.H. White, P. Wakabayashi, J.L. Collett, Jr., and Y. Xiao-Ying. 2004b. Efficiency of IMPROVE network denuders for removing nitric acid. In Proceedings, Regional and Global Perspectives on Haze: Causes, Consequences and Controversies, 32-1–32-8. Pittsburgh, PA: Air & Waste Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W.C., and J.F. Pouchot. 1983. The measurement of gas flow, Part I. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 33(1): 66–72. doi:10.1080/00022470.1983.10465548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, P.F., T. Furuta, and J.R. Rhodes. 1969. Particle size effects in x-ray spectrometry. In Advances in X-Ray Analysis, ed. C.S. Barrett, 612–632. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T.C., T.L. Anderson, and D.E. Campbell. 1999. Calibration and intercomparison of filter-based measurements of visible light absorption by aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 30(6): 582–600. doi:10.1080/027868299304435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond T.C., and R.W. Bergstrom. 2006. Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40(1): 27–67. doi:10.1080/02786820500421521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, J.R., E. Vega, J.G. Watson, J.M. Hales, and G.M. Hidy. 2004. Chapter 7: Receptor methods. In Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers—A NARSTO Assessment, Part 1, 235–281. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press:.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., F.K. Duan, K.B. He, M. Zheng, Z.Y. Du, Y.L. Ma, and J.H. Tan. 2011. Intercomparison of thermal-optical methods for the determination of organic and elemental carbon: Influences of aerosol composition and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(23): 10117–10123. doi:10.1021/es202649g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester. 2009. Standard Operating Procedure XR-002.04. Analysis of Elements in Air Particulate by X-Ray Fluorescence (Kevex 770 & 772), US EPA 10 3.3. Chester Labs, Tigard, OR. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/ChesterXR00204.pdf ( accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C. 1995. Measurement methods to determine compliance with ambient air quality standards for suspended particles. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 45(5): 320–382. doi:10.1080/10473289.1995.10467369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.C. Pritchett, W.R. Pierson, C.A. Frazier, and R.G. Purcell. 1993. The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance carbon analysis system: Description, evaluation and applications in U.S. air quality studies. Atmos. Environ. 27A(8): 1185–1201. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(93)90245-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, D. Crow, D.H. Lowenthal, and T.M. Merrifield. 2001. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34(1): 23–34. doi:10.1080/02786820119073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.W.A. Chen, W.P. Arnott, H. Moosmuller, and K.K. Fung. 2004. Equivalence of elemental carbon by Thermal/Optical Reflectance and Transmittance with different temperature protocols. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(16): 4414–4422. doi:10.1021/es034936u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.-W.A. Chen, G. Paredes-Miranda, M.-C.O. Chang, D.L. Trimble, K.K. Fung, H. Zhang, and J.Z. Yu. 2005a. Refining temperature measures in thermal/optical carbon analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5(4): 2961–2972. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2961/2005/acp-5-2961-2005.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). doi:10.5194/acp-5-2961-2005
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, D.H. Lowenthal, and K.L. Magliano. 2005b. Loss of PM2.5 nitrate from filter samples in Central California., J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 55: 1158–1168. doi:10.1080/10473289.2005.10464704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.-W.A. Chen, M.C.O. Chang, N.F. Robinson, D. Trimble, and S. Kohl. 2007. The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: Maintaining consistency with a long-term database. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 57(9): 1014–1023. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.57.9.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., P. Doraiswamy, J.G. Watson, L.-W.A. Chen, S.S.H. Ho, and D.A. Sodeman. 2008. Advances in integrated and continuous measurements for particle mass and chemical composition. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58(2): 141–163. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.-W.A. Chen, J. Rice, and N.H. Frank. 2010. Quantification of PM2.5 organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10:5223–5239 http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/5223/2010/acp-10-5223-2010.pdf (accesssed May 29, 2014). doi:10.5194/acp-10-5223-2010
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M.S. 2002a. Nylon filter extraction study July 30, 2002. Technical memorandum to James Homolya, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/nylfilstd.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M.S. 2002b. PM2.5 quartz filter experiments. Technical memorandum to James Homolya, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/carboncsr.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M.S. 2003. Nylon® filter extraction study #2. Technical memorandum to James Homolya, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/nylstud2.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Conny, J.M., D.B. Klinedinst, S.A. Wight, and J.L.Paulsen. 2003. Optimizing thermal-optical methods for measuring atmospheric elemental (black) carbon: A response surface study. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 37:703–723. doi:10.1080/02786820300920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutant, B., and S. Stetzer. 2001. Evaluation of PM2.5 speciation sampler performance and related sample collection and stability issues, Final report. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/minitrends.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• DRI. 2005. Standard operating procedure for the determination of carbon fractions in particulate matter using the IMPROVE_A heating protocol on a Sunset Laboratory dual-mode analyzer. IMP_A Carbon Analysis of PM-SSL. Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/RTIIMPROVEACarbonAnalysisSSLSOP.pdf ( accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Dzubay, T.G., and R.O. Nelson. 1975. Self absorption corrections for X-ray fluorescence analysis of aerosols. In Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 18, ed. W.L. Pickles, C.S. Barrett, J.B. Newkirk, and C.O. Rund, 619–631. New York, NY, Plenum Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Eldred, R.A., T.A. Cahill, L.K. Wilkinson, P.J. Feeney, J.C. Chow, and W.C. Malm. 1990. Measurement of fine particles and their chemical components in the NPS/IMPROVE Networks. In Transactions, Visibility and Fine Particles, ed. C.V. Mathai, 187–196. Pittsburgh, PA: Air & Waste Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 1997. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate Particulate Matter: Final rule. 40 CFR Parts 50, 53, and 58, July 18. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/fr_notices/pmnaaqs.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 1999. Part II, Environmental Protection Agency, 40 CFR Part 51, Regional Haze Regulations, Final rule, July 1. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/fr_notices/rhfedreg.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2006. National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter: Final rule. 40 CFR Parts 50, 53, and 58, Volume 62 (138). Part 50, Part 53—Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods. http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=6786c9c05698e1df6a087fee4f1c0734&node=40:6.0.1.1.1& gn=div5 (accessed May 29, 2014). Part 58—Ambient Air Quality Surveillance, http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=6786c9c05698e1df6a087fee4f1c0734&node=40:6.0.1.1.6&rgn=div5 (accessedMay 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2013. Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods, 40 CFR Parts 53 - 59, Chapter 1, Subchapter C—Air programs. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2013-title40-vol6/pdf/CFR-2013-title40-vol6.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2014. Appendix B to Part 136—Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit—Revision 1.11. 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition). file:///H:/Temp/Delete/CFR-2012-title40-vol24-part136-appB.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fehsenfeld, F.C., D. Hastie, J.C. Chow, and P.A. Solomon. 2004. Particle and gas measurements. In Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers, A NARSTO Assessment, ed. P.H. McMurry, M.F. Shepherd, J.S. Vickery, 159–189. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz, D. 2002. Evaluation of diffusion denuder coatings for removing acid gases from ambient air. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/denudr.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Flocchini, R., L. Ashbaugh, R. Eldred, P. Feeney, S. Ixquiac, P. Beveridge. 2002. Quality assurance guidance document revision 0.0. IMPROVE: Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments, Quality assurance project plan, OAQPS Category 1 QAPP. UC Davis, Davis, CA. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/publications/QA_QC/IMPROVE_QAPP_R0.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J., L. Michael, R.K.M. Jayanty, K. Baumann, and P.A. Solomon. 2014. National PM2.5 monitoring networks in the United States—CSN/STN and IMPROVE: Intercomparison of PMF receptor modeling results using data from colocated IMPROVE and CSN PM2.5 chemical speciation samplers. In preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Gego, E. L., P.S. Porter, J.S. Irwin, C. Hogrefe, and S.T. Rao. 2005. Assessing the comparability of ammonium, nitrate and sulfate concentrations measured by three air quality monitoring networks. Pure Appl. Geophys. 162:1919–1939. doi:10.1007/s00024-005-2698-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutknecht, W.F., J.A. O’Rourke, J.B. Flanagan, W.C. Eaton, M.R. Peterson, and L.C. Greene. 2001. Research to investigate the source(s) of high field blanks for Teflon® PM_2.5 filters. Report Number RTI/07565/019-01FR, EPA Contract No. 68-D-99-0013, prepared by Research Triangle Institute, Center for Environ. Measurement & Quality Assurance, Research Triangle Park, NC, for EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Gutknecht, W.F., J.B. Flanagan, and A. McWilliams. 2006. Harmonization of interlaboratory X-ray fluorescence measurement uncertainties. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/xrfdet.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gutknecht, W., J. Flanagan, A. McWilliams, R.K.M. Jayanty, R. Kellogg, J. Rice, P. Duda, and R.H. Sarver. 2010. Harmonization of uncertainties of X-ray fluorescence data for PM2.5 air filter analysis. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 60(2):n184–194. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.60.2.184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R.M., and J. Yin. 2000. Particulate matter in the atmosphere: Which particle properties are important for its effects on health? Sci. Total Environ. 249(1–3): 85–101. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00513-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering, S.V., D.R. Lawson, P.A. Solomon, et al. 1988. The nitric acid shootout: Field comparison of measurement methods. Atmos. Environ. 22(8): 1519–1539. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(88)90379-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering, S.V., and G.R. Cass. 1999. The magnitude of bias in the measurement of PM2.5 arising from volatilization of particulate nitrate from Teflon filters. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 49:725–733. doi:10.1080/10473289.1999.10463843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering, S., P.M. Fine, C. Sioutas, P.A. Jaques, J.L. Ambs, O. Hogrefe, and K.L. Demerjian. 2004. Field assessment of the dynamics of particulate nitrate vaporization using differential TEOM and automated nitrate monitors Atmos. Environ. 38: 5183–5192. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W.C. 1999. Aerosol Technology. Properties, Behavor, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, P.K., ed. 1991. Receptor Modeling for Air Quality Management. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hopke, P.K. 2003. Recent developments in receptor modeling. J.Chemometrics 17(5): 255–265. doi:10.1002/cem.796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop, N.P., and W.H. White. 2008a. An empirical approach to estimating detection limits using colocated data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(14): 5235–5240. doi:10.1021/es7025196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop, N.P. and W.H. White. 2008b. An evaluation of interagency monitoring of protected visual environments (IMPROVE) colocated precision and uncertainty estimates. Atmos. Environ. 42(11): 2691–2705. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 1997. SOP 301, IMPROVE standard operating procedures for X-ray fluorescence analysis, 2/4/97. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/SOPs/ucdavis_sops/sop301.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2002. IMPROVE: Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments quality assurance project plan OAQPS category 1 QAPP. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/QA_QC/IMPROVE_QAPP_R0.pdf (accessed May 28, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2005. Standard operating procedures for National Park Service filter preparation, extraction, and anion analysis. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/SOPs/RTI_SOPs/RTI_IonSOP102605.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2006. Report IV, November. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/Reports/2006/2006.htm (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012a. Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/ (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012b. IMPROVE standard operating protocols. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/IMPROVE_SOPs.htm (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012c. SOP 201, Sampler maintenance by site operators. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/SOPs/ucdsop.asp (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012d. SOP 251, Sample handling. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/SOPs/UCDavis_SOPs/SOP251_Sample_Handling_2013.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012e. Quality assurance for the IMPROVE network. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Data/QA_QC/qa_qc_Branch.htm (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012f. SOP 326, PIXE and PESA analysis. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/SOPs/ucdsop.asp (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2012g. IMPROVE Data advisories. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Data/QA_QC/Advisory.htm (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2014a. IMPROVE standard operating procedure for the X-ray fluorescence analysis of aerosol deposits on PTFE filters (with PANalytical Epsilon 5) SOP 301, SOP 301, Version 2, January 17, 2014. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/SOPs/ucdavis_sops/sop301_XRF_2014.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• IMPROVE. 2014b. IMPROVE quarterly newsletters. Colorado State University, Boulder, CO. http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Publications/news_letters.htm (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, H., P. Patterson, and W.C. Malm. 2000. Sampling duration calculations. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50(5): 888–893. doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, W., and G. Reischl 1980. A cyclone for size-selective sampling of ambient air. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 30(8): 872–876. doi:10.1080/00022470.1980.10465122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampa, M., and E. Castanas. 2008. Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 151(2):362–367. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L.C., and R.A. Gussman. 2000. A direct approach to the design of cyclones for aerosol-monitoring applications. J. Aerosol Sci. 31(12): 1407–1420. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L.C., R.A. Gussman, and M.B. Meyer. 2000. Development of a sharp-cut cyclone for ambient aerosol monitoring applications. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 32(4): 338–358. doi:10.1080/027868200303669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L., G. Beaumont, A. Gudmundsson, A. Thorpe, and W. Koch. 2005. Aspiration and sampling efficiencies of the TSP and louvered particulate matter inlets. J. Environ. Monit. 7(5): 481–487. doi:10.1039/b419001g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B.M., J. Cassmassi, H. Hogo, and M.D. Zeldin. 2001. Positive organic carbon artifacts on filter medium during PM2.5 sampling in the South Coast Air Basin. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34(1): 35–41. doi:10.1080/027868201300081941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., P.K. Hopke, and Y. Qin. 2005. Estimation of organic carbon blank values and error structures of the speciation trends network data for source apportionment. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 55(8):1190–1199. doi:10.1080/10473289.2005.10464705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutrakis, P. 1998. Recommendations of the Expert Panel on the EPA Speciation Network. Prepared for Office of Air and Radiation, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/speciate.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Koutrakis, P. 1999. Recommendations of the Expert Panel on the EPA Speciation Network (Draft 7/12/99). Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/lvpanel.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Landis, B. 2014. CSN network assessment. ORD sponsored webinar, May 1, 2014. Research Triangle Park, NC. http://epa.gov/ncer/events/calendar/2014/may01/presentation.pdf. CSN assessment—Decision matrix for 53 low value sites recommended for defunding. http://epa.gov/ncer/events/calendar/2014/may01/defund-list.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lewtas, J., Y. Pang, D. Booth, S. Reimer, D.J. Eatough, and L.A. Gundel. 2001. Comparison of sampling methods for semi-volatile organic carbon associated with PM2.5. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34(1): 9–22. doi:10.1080/02786820118935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maimone, F., B.J. Turpin, P. Solomon, Q. Meng, A.L. Robinson, R. Subramanian, and A. Polidori. 2011. Correction methods for organic carbon artifacts when using quartz-fiber filters in large particulate matter monitoring networks: The regression method and other options. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 61(6): 696–710. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, W.C., B.A. Schichtel, and M.L. Pitchford. 2011. Uncertainties in PM2.5 gravimetric and speciation measurements and what we can learn from them. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 61(11): 1131–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G. 2013. Initial area designations for the 2012 Revised Primary Annual Fine Particle National Ambient Air Quality Standard. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC. http://www.epa.gov/pmdesignations/2012standards/docs/april2013guidance.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• McClellan, R., B. Jessiman, P. McMurry, M. Shepherd, and J. Vickery. 2004. Health context for management of particulate matter. In Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers—A NARSTO Assessment, ed. P.H. McMurry, M.F. Shepherd, and J.S. Vickery, 69–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDade, C.E., A.M. Dillner, and H. Indresand. 2009 Particulate matter sample deposit geometry and effective filter face velocities. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 59(9): 1045–1048. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1045
   Google Scholar
• McDow, S.R., and J.J. Huntzicker. 1990. Vapor adsorption artifact in the sampling of organic aerosol: Face velocity effects. Atmos. Environ. 24:2563–2571. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(90)90134-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, Y., N.L. Eatough, J. Wilson, and D.J. Eatough. 2002. Effect of semi-volatile material on PM2.5 measurement by the PM2.5 Federal Reference Method sampler at Bakersfield, California. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36:289–299. doi:10.1080/027868202753504489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A.J., D.A. Lane, L.A. Gundel, G.L. Northcott, and K.C. Jones. 2000. A comparison of high volume and diffusion denuder samplers for measuring semivolatile organic compounds in the atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:5001–5006. doi:10.1021/es000056t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, T.M., R.A. Gussman, L.C. Kenny, and R.W. Vanderpool. 2001. Evaluation of PM2.5 size selectors used in speciation samplers. Aerosol Sci. Techno. 34(5): 422–429. doi:10.1080/027868201750172833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M.R., J. Smiley, S. Taylor, Jr., R.L. Hines, and M.H. Richards 2007. Effects of quartz filter type on sampling and organic carbon/elemental carbon analysis of PM2.5. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/20070103quartzfiltercomparison.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M.R., and M.H. Richards. 2002. Thermal-optical-transmittance analysis for organic, elemental, carbonate, total carbon, and OCX2 in PM2.5 by the EPA/NIOSH method. In Proceedings, Symposium on Air Quality Measurement Methods and Technology—2002, ed. E.D. Winegar and R.J. Tropp, 83-1–83-19. Pittsburgh, PA: Air & Waste Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2008. Standard operating procedure for PM2.5 Gravimetric analysis, Revision 7. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/RTIGravMassSOPFINAL.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2009a. Standard operating procedures for coating aluminum honeycomb denuders with magnesium oxide. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2009b. Standard operating procedure for cleaning nylon filters used for collection of PM2.5 material. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/pm25nyloncleaningsop.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2009c. Standard operating procedure for PM2.5 cation analysis. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/pm25cationsop.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2009d. Standard operating procedure for PM2.5 anion analysis. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/pm25anionsop.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2009e. Standard operating procedure for the determination of organic, elemental, and total carbon in particulate matter using a thermal/optical transmittance carbon analyzer. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. .http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/RTIOCECSOP.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2009f. Standard operating procedure for the X-ray fluorescence analysis of PM2.5 deposits on Teflon filters. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/pmxrfsop.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html ( accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2011. Standard operating procedure for procurement and acceptance testing of Teflon, nylon, and quartz filters. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/RTIFilterProcurementSOPFINAL.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specsop.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTI. 2013. Chemical speciation—Field standard operating procedures. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/spectraining.html (accessed May 29, 2014). Updates may be available.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J.J., W.F. Rogge, M.A. Mazurek, L.M. Hildemann, G.R. Cass, and B.R.T. Simoneit. 1996. Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmos. Environ. 30(22): 3837–3855. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(96)00085-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffe R.D., P.A. Solomon, R. Husar, et al. 2009. The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy: Rethinking the role of national networks. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 59:579–590. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.5.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, H.P., L. Laskus, H.J. Abraham, U. Baltensperger, V.M. H. Lavanchy, M. Bizjak, P. Burba, H. Cachier, D. Crow, J.C. Chow, T. Gnauk, A. Even, H.M. ten Brink, K.P. Giesen, R. Hitzenberger, C. Hueglin, W. Maenhaut, C.A. Pio, J. Puttock, J.P. Putaud, D. Toom-Sauntry, and H. Puxbaum. 2001. Results of the “Carbon Conference” international aerosol carbon round robin test: Stage 1. Atmos. Environ. 35(12): 2111–2121. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00493-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seinfeld, J.H., and S.N. Pandis. 1998. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics From Air Pollution to Climate Change. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smiley, J. 2013. Experimental inter-comparison of speciation laboratories—Study #8. Research Triangle Park, NC, Technical Memorandum to Dennis Crumpler, June 26, 2013. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/qa/MultilabSpeciationPT2012.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014) Previous reports are available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmspec.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., L. Salmon, T. Fall, and G.R. Cass. 1992. The spatial and temporal distribution of atmospheric nitric acid and particulate nitrate concentrations in Los Angeles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26(8): 1594–1601. doi:10.1021/es00032a016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., W. Mitchell, D. Gemmill, M.P. Tolocka, G. Norris, R. Wiener, S. Eberly, J. Rice, J. Homolya, R. Scheffe, R. Vanderpool, R. Murdoch, S. Natarajan, and E. Hardison. 2000. Evaluation of PM2.5 chemical speciation samplers for use in the EPA National PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Network. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/fourcty.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., M.P. Tolocka, G. Norris, M. Landis. 2001. Chemical analysis methods for atmospheric aerosol components. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Application, ed. P. Baron and K. Willeke, 261–293. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., K. Baumann, E. Edgerton, R. Tanner, D. Eatough, W. Modey, H. Maring, D. Savoie, S. Natarajan, M.B. Meyer, and G. Norris. 2003. Comparison of integrated samplers for mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta Supersites project. J. Geophys. Res. 108(D7): 8423. doi:10.1029/2001JD001218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., and P.K. Hopke. 2008. Introduction: special issue supporting key scientific and policy- and health-relevant findings from EPA’s Particulate Matter Supersites Program and related studies: An integration and synthesis of results. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58(2): 137–139. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., P.K. Hopke, J. Froines, and R. Scheffe. 2008. Key scientific and policy- and health-relevant findings from EPA’s Particulate Matter Supersites Program and related studies: An integration and synthesis of results. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58(13): S1–S92. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.13.S-1
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P.A., M. Costantini, T.J. Grahame, M.E. Gerlofs-Nijland, F. Cassee, A.G. Russell, J.R. Brook, P.K. Hopke, G. Hidy, R.F. Phalen, P. Saldiva, S. Ebelt Sarnat, J.R. Balmes, I.B. Tager, H. Özkaynak, S. Vedal, S.S.G. Wierman, and D.L. Costa. 2012. Air pollution and health: Bridging the gap from sources to health outcomes: Conference summary. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 5(1): 9–62. doi:10.1007/s11869-011-0161-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R., A.Y. Khlystov, J.C. Cabada, and A.L. Robinson. 2004. Positive and negative artifacts in particulate organic carbon measurements with denuded and undenuded sampler configurations. Aerosol Sc. Technol. 38(Suppl. 1): 27–48. doi:10.1080/02786820390229354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technology Transfer Network. 2012a. Chemical speciation—Data management and reporting. Technology Transfer Network Ambient Monitoring Technology, AMTIC. EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specdat.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Technology Transfer Network. 2012b. Chemical speciation—Special studies. Technology Transfer Network Ambient Monitoring Technology, AMTIC, EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specstud.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tolocka, M.P., P.A. Solomon, W. Mitchell, G.A. Norris, D. B. Gemmill, R.W. Wiener, R.W. Vanderpool, J.B. Homolya, and J. Rice. 2001. East versus west in the U.S: Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 during the winter of 1999. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34(1): 88–96. doi:10.1080/02786820118957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J., S.V. Hering, and J.J. Huntzicker. 1994. Investigation of organic aerosol sampling artifacts in the Los Angeles Basin. Atmos. Environ. 28: 3061–3071. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(94)00133-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpin, B.J., P. Saxena, and E. Andrews. 2000. Measuring and simulating particulate organics in the atmosphere: Problems and prospects. Atmos. Environ. 34(18): 2983–3013. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00501-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Quality assurance guidance document 2.12, Monitoring in PM2.5 ambient air using designated reference or Class I equivalent methods. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/qa/m212covd.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999a. Particulate matter (PM2.5) speciation guidance, Final draft, October 7, 1999. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Monitoring and Quality Assurance Group, Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/specfinl.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999b. Data quality objectives for the trends component of the PM2.5 Speciation Network. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/dqo3.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999c. Compendium of methods for the determination of inorganic compounds in ambient air compendium method IO-3.3 Determination of metals in ambient particulate matter using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/inorganic/mthd-3-3.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Quality assurance guidance document, Final quality assurance project plan: PM2.5 Speciation Trends Network field sampling. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/1025sqap.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005a. PM2.5 Speciation Network Newsletter, Issue 4, October. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/spnews4.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005b. PM2.5 Speciation Network Newsletter, Issue 2, January. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/spnews2.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005c. Draft, National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/monitorstrat/naamstrat2005.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. PM2.5 Speciation Network Newsletter, Issue 5, April. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/spnews5.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007a. EPA PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Network Carbon Sampler Replacement Program: Phase I. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/EPA_Carbon_report%20ARS%20JRICE%2010-10-07.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007b. URG 3000N phase I carbon implementation report, August 2007. Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/EPA_Carbon_report%20ARS%20JRICE%2010-10-07.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007c. Field/trip blank collection for carbon in the PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN). Changes with the new URG3000N carbon measurement system, Note to URG3000N Phase 1 Implementation Group1, July 18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/blank-Schedule.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009a. Integrated science assessment for particulate matter (EPA/ 600/R-08/139F). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=216546 (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009b. URG3000N phase II carbon implementation report. Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/URG3000NPhaseIIReportFinal.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. PM 2.5 Speciation—Lab audit reports and assessments. EPA, National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory, Montgomery, AL. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmspec.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012a. Technology Transfer Network (TTN), Air Quality System (AQS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/ (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012b. Technology Transfer Network Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center, Chemical Speciation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/speciepg.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012c. CSN and IMPROVE air sampler photographs and diagrams. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/pm25pict.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012d. Quality assurance guidance document, Quality assurance project plan: PM2.5 chemical speciation sampling at Trends, NCore, Supplemental and Tribal Sites (An update to the PM2.5 Speciation Trends Network Field Sampling QAPP, December 2000), EPA EPA-454/B-12-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/CSN_QAPP_v120_05-2012.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012e. Chemical speciation—URG3000N carbon implementation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/specurg3000.html (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012f. Quality assurance project plan, Chemical speciation of PM2.5 filter samples. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. Rpt. RTI/0212053/01QA, May. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/pm25/spec/qapp.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014)., last asccessed 4-24-24.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Master CSN site list including trends 2013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/spec/MasterCSNListforAMTIC050313.xlsx ( accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow, and L.-W.A. Chen. 2005. Summary of organic and elemental carbon/black carbon analysis methods and intercomparisons. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 5(1): 65–102. http://aaqr.org/VOL5_No1_June2005/6_AAQR-05-06-OA-0006_65-102.pdf (accessed May 29, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G., L.W. Chen, J.C. Chow, P. Doraiswamy, and D.H. Lowenthal. 2008. Source apportionment: Findings from the U.S. Supersites Program. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58(2): 265–288. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow, L.W. Chen, and N.H. Frank. 2009. Methods to assess carbonaceous aerosol sampling artifacts for IMPROVE and other long-term networks. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 59:898–911. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.8.898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J.G., and J.C. Chow. 2011. Ambient aerosol sampling. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques and Applications, ed. P. Kulkarni, P.A. Baron, and K. Willeke, 3rd ed., 591–614. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• White, W.H., L.L. Ashbaugh, N.P. Hyslop, and C.E. McDade. 2005. Estimating measurement uncertainty in an ambient sulfate trend. Atmos. Environ. 39(36): 6857–6867. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X.Y., T. Lee, B. Ayres, S.M. Kreidenweis, W. Malm, and J.L. Collett. 2006. Loss of fine particle ammonium from denuded nylon filters. Atmos. Environ. 40(25): 4797–4807. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W.X., P.K. Hopke, G. Norris, R. Williams, and P. Paatero. 2006. Source apportionment and analysis on ambient and personal exposure samples with a combined receptor model and an adaptive blank estimation strategy. Atmos. Environ. 40(20): 3788–3801. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar