Emission of submicron aerosol particles in cement kilns: Total concentration and size distribution

References

• Abdul-Wahab, S.A. 2006. Impact of fugitive dust emissions from cement plants on nearby communities. Ecol. Model. 195:338–348. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Allaban, M., and H. Abu-Qudais. 2011. Impact assessment of ambient air quality by cement industry: A case study in Jordan. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 11:802–810. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2011.07.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adaska, W.S., and D.H. Taubert. 2008. Beneficial uses of cement kiln dust. Paper presented at 2008 IEEE Cement Industry Technical Conference Record, Miami, FL, May 16–22, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, R.J., K.S. Creely, and C.L. Tran. 2004. Nanoparticles: An Occupational Hygiene Review. Edinburgh: Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Institute of Occupational Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Buonanno, G., G. Ficco, and L. Stabile. 2009. Size distribution and number concentration of particles at the stack of a municipal waste incinerator. Waste Manage. 29:749–755. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonanno, G., L. Stabile, P. Avino, and E. Belluso. 2011. Chemical, dimensional and morphological ultrafine particle characterization from a waste-to-energy plant. Waste Manage. 31:2253–2262. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.06.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonanno, G., M. Scungio, L. Stabile, and W. Tirler. 2012. Ultrafine particle emission from incinerators: The role of the fabric filter. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62:103–111. doi:10.1080/10473289.2011.636501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtscher, H. 2001. Sampling, measurement, and characterization of combustion aerosols for chemistry, morphology, and size distribution. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Aerosols from Biomass Combustion, ETH-Zürich, June 27, 2001, ed. Th. Nussbaumer, 19–28. Verenum, Zurich: IEA Bioenergy Task 32 and Swiss Federal Office of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Cass, G.R., L.A. Hughes, P. Bhave, M.J. Kleeman, J.O. Allen, and L.G. Salmon. 2000. The chemical composition of atmospheric ultrafine particles. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 358:2581–2592. doi:10.1098/rsta.2000.0670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, A., and R.M. Harrison. 2003. Primary particle formation from vehicle emissions during exhaust dilution in the road side atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 37:4109–4119. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00510-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A.G., and G. Bartle. 1998. Industrial Air Pollution Monitoring: Gaseous and Particulate Emissions, ed. A.G. Clarke. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Commodo, M., L. Sgro, A. D’Anna, and P. Minutolo. 2012. Size distribution of nanoparticles generated by a heating stove burning wood pellets. Int. J. Environ. Qual. 8:21–26. doi:10.6092/issn.2281-4485/3747
   Google Scholar
• Conesa, J.A., A. Galvez, F. Mateos, I. Martin-Gullon, and R. Font. 2008. Organic and inorganic pollutants from cement kiln stack feeding alternative fuels. J. Hazard. Mater. 158:585–592. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conesa, J.A., L. Rey, S. Egea, and M.D. Rey. 2011. Pollutant formation and emissions from cement kiln stack using a solid recovered fuel from municipal solid waste. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:5878–5884. doi:10.1021/es200448u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, K., L. Tran, L.A. Jimenez, R. Duffin, D.E. Newby, N. Mills, W. MacNee, and V. Stone. 2005. Combustion derived nanoparticles: A review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2:10. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-2-10
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), Reference Document on Best Available Techniques (BREF) in the Cement and Lime Manufactory industries, Seville. http://eippcb.jrc.es (accessed January 15, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Italian Group. 2008. UNI EN 15259. Air quality—Measurement of stationary source emissions—Requirements for measurement sections and sites and for the measurement objective, plan and report. http://store.uni.com/magento-1.4.0.1/index.php/uni-en-15259-2008.html?josso_back_to=http://store.uni.com/josso-security-check.php&josso_cmd=login_optional&josso_partnerapp_host=store.uni.com (accessed February 20, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Garg, A., R. Smith, D. Hill, N. Simms, and S. Pollard. 2007. Wastes as cofuels: The policy framework for solid recovered fuel (SRF) in Europe, with UK implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:4868–4874. doi:10.1021/es062163e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genon, G., and E. Brizio. 2008. Perspectives and limits for cement kilns as a destination for RDF. Waste Manage. 28:2375–2385. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasius, M., M. Ketzel, P. Wåhlin, R. Bossi, J. Stubkjær, O. Hertel, and F. Palmgren. 2008. Characterization of particles from residential wood combustion and modelling of spatial variation in a low-strength emission area. Atmos. Environ. 42:8686–8697. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsch, E., L. Gidhagen, P. Wählin, P. Oyola, and F. Moreno. 2009. Predominance of soot-mode ultrafine particles in Santiago de Chile: Possible sources. Atmos. Environ. 43:2260–2267. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R.K., D. Majumdar, J.V. Trivedi, and A.D. Bhanarkar. 2012. Particulate matter and elemental emissions from a cement kiln. Fuel Process. Technol. 104:343–351. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Effects Institute. 2013. Understanding the Health Effect of Ambient Ultrafine Particles. HEI Perspectives 3. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hoek, G., H. Boogaard, A. Knol, J. de Hartog, P. Slottje, J.G. Ayres, P. Borm, B. Brunekreef, K. Donaldson, F. Forastiere, et al. 2010. Concentration response functions for ultrafine particles and all-cause mortality and hospital admissions: Results of a European expert panel elicitation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:476–482. doi:10.1021/es9021393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein, T., T. Glytsos, J. Ondracek, P. Dohányosová, V. Zdímal, K. Hämeri, M. Lazaridis, J. Smolík, and M. Kulmala. 2006. Particle size characterization and emission rates during indoor activities in a house. Atmos. Environ. 40:4285–4307. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jons, E., S. Hundebol, and K. Clausen. 2008. New reason For installing a chloride by-pass. Interaction between chloride and sulphur. Paper presented at 2008 IEEE Cement Industry Technical Conference Record, Miami, FL, May 16–22, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kalacic, I. 1973. Chronic non specific lung disease in cement workers. Arch. Environ. Health 26:78–83. doi:10.1080/00039896.1973.10666228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousaka, Y., K. Okuyama, and M. Adachi. 1985. Determination of particle size distribution of ultra-fine aerosols using a differential mobility analyzer. Aerosol Sci Technol. 4:209–225. doi:10.1080/02786828508959049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch, T.A.J., and C. Asbach. 2011. Particle characterization. In Cardiovascular Effects of Inhaled Ultrafine and Nanosized Particles, ed. F.R. Cassee, N.L. Mills, and D.E. Newby, 61–87. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., P. Fennell, and A. Robins. 2010. Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities. J. Nanopart. Res. 12: 1523–1530. doi:10.1007/s11051-010-9893-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., L. Pirjola, M. Ketzel, and R.M. Harrison. 2013. Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaust sources—A review. Atmos. Environ. 67:252–277. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luther, W. 2004. Technological Analysis Industrial Application of nanomaterials—Chances and Risks. Technology Analysis. Düsseldorf, Germany: Future Technologies Division of VDI Technologiezentrum, with the support of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Maghun, J., E. Karg, A. Kettrup, and R. Zimmermann. 2003. On-line analysis of the size distribution of fine and ultrafine aerosol particles in flue and stack gas of a municipal waste incineration plant: Effect of dynamic process control measures and emission reduction devices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:4761–4770. doi:10.1021/es020227p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, K.L., F. Alessandrini, F. Beck-Speier, T.P.J. Hofer, S. Diabaté, E. Bitterle, T. Stöger, T. Jakob, H. Behrendt, M. Horsch, et al. 2008. Health effects of ambient particulate matter—Biological mechanisms and inflammatory responses to in vitro and in vivo particle exposures. Inhal. Toxicol. 20:319–337. doi:10.1080/08958370701866313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meo, S.A., M.A. Azeem, M.G. Ghori, and M.M.F. Subhan. 2002. Lung function and surface electromyography of intercostal muscles in cement mill workers. Int. J. Occup. Med. Health 15:279–287.
   Google Scholar
• Mönkkönen, P., R. Uma, D. Srinivasan, I.K. Koponen, K.E.J. Lehtinen, K. Hämeria, R. Suresh, V.P. Sharma, M. Kulmala. 2004. Relationship and variations of aerosol number and PM10 mass concentrations in a highly polluted urban environment—New Delhi, India. Atmos. Environ. 38: 425–433. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska, L., Z. Ristovski, E.R. Jayaratne, D.U. Keogh, and X. Ling. 2008a. Ambient nano and ultrafine particles from motor vehicle emissions: Characteristics, ambient processing and implications on human exposure. Atmos. Environ. 42:8113–8138. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska, L., S. Thomas, W. Hofmann, Z. Ristovski, M. Jamriska, T. Rettenmoser, and S. Kagerer. 2004. Exploratory cross-sectional investigations on ambient submicrometer particles in Salzburg, Austria. Atmos. Environ. 38:3529–3533. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska, L., S. Thomas, D.U. Keogh, and K. Mengersen. 2008b. Modality in ambient particle size distributions and its potential as a basis for developing air quality regulation. Atmos. Environ. 42:1617–1628. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S.M., H. Agrawal, A. Sorooshian, L.T. Padró, H. Gates, S. Hersey, W.A. Welch, H. Jung, J.W. Miller, D.R. Cocker, III, et al. 2009. Comprehensive simultaneous shipboard and airborne characterization of exhaust from a modern container ship at sea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:4626–4640. doi:10.1021/es802413j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrino, C., M. Catrambone, M. Rotatori, and R. Ferrero. 2010. Calculating the chemical composition of particulate matter. World Cement Magazine, UK. www.worldcement.com (accessed March 6, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Pey, J., X. Querol, A. Alastuey, S. Rodríguez, J.P. Putaud, and R. Van Dingenen. 2009. Source apportionment of urban fine and ultra fine particle number concentration in a western Mediterranean city. Atmos. Environ. 43:4407–4415. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, S., R. Van Dingenen, J.-P. Putaud, A. Dell’Acqua, J. Pey, X. Querol, A. Alastuey, S. Chenery, K.-F. Ho, R. Harrison, et al. 2007. A study on the relationship between mass concentrations, chemistry and number size distribution of urban fine aerosols in Milan, Barcelona and London. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7:605–639. doi:10.5194/acpd-7-605-2007
   Google Scholar
• Sutou K., H. Harada, and N. Ueno. 2001. Chlorine bypass system for stable kiln operation and recycling of waste. Paper presented at Technical Conference on Cement Process Engineering, 21st Plenary Session of the VDZ Process Engineering Committee, Düsseldorf, Germany, February 22, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Terzano, C., F. Di Stefano, V. Conti, E. Graziani, and A. Petroianni. 2010. Air pollution ultrafine particles: Toxicity beyond the lung. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 14:809–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigtlander, J., T. Tuch, W. Birmili, and A. Wiedensohler. 2006. Correlation between traffic density and particle size distribution in a street canyon and the dependence on wind direction. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6:4275–4286. doi:10.5194/acp-6-4275-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wählin, P. 2009. Measured reduction of kerbside ultrafine particle number concentrations in Copenhagen. Atmos. Environ. 43:3645–3647. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., P.K. Hopke, D.C. Chalupa, and J. Utell. 2011. Long-term study of urban ultrafine particles and other pollutants. Atmos. Environ. 45:7672–7680. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, S. 2009. Spatio-temporal covariation of urban particle number concentration and ambient noise. Atmos. Environ. 43:5518–5525. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, H., J. Hao, L. Duan, X. Li and X Guo. 2006. Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from power plants in China. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 56:1243–1251. doi:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., R.H. Gangupomu, D. Ramirez, and Y. Zhu. 2010. Measurement of ultrafine particles and other air pollutants emitted by cooking activities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7:1744–1759. doi:10.3390/ijerph7041744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar