Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions

References

• Akhtar, F.H., R.W. Pinder, D.H. Loughlin, and D.K. Henze. 2013. GLIMPSE: A rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:12011–12019. doi:10.1021/es402283j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balash, P., C. Nichols, and N. Victor. 2013. Multi-regional evaluation of the U.S. electricity sector under technology and policy uncertainties: Findings from MARKAL EPA9rUS modeling. Socio. Econ. Plan. Sci. 47:89–119. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K.E., D.K. Henze, and J.B. Milford. 2013. Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:3065–3072. doi:10.1021/es304281g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, L.E., P. Kyle, M.A. Wise, K. Calvin, J.A. Edmonds, S.H. Kim, M. Placet, and S. Smith. 2008. CO₂ Emission Mitigation and Technology Advance: An Updated Analysis of Advanced Technology Scenarios. Report No. PNNL-18075. Richlands, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2005. Rule to reduce interstate transport of fine particulate matter and ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule); Revisions to Acid Rain Program; Revisions to the NO_x SIP Call. 40 CFR Parts 51. 72, 73, 74, 77, 78 and 96, OAR-2003-0053; FRL-7885-9, 70 (90), Environmental Protection Agency, May 12.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2008. National ambient air quality standards for ozone. 40 CFR Parts 50 and 58, 73(60), Mar. 27.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2011. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units and standards of performance for fossil-fuel-fired electric utility, industrial-commercial-institutional, and small industrial-commercial-institutional steam generating units. 40 CFR Part 63, EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234; EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044, FRL-9286-1, Environmental Protection Agency, December 16.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2014. Carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: Electric utility generating units; Proposed rule. 40 CFR Part 60, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602; FRL-9911-86-OAR, 79 (117), Environmental Protection Agency, June 18.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, G.A., L.A. Goudarzi, P. Delaquil, and E. Wright. 2008. NE-12 MARKAL final report: Structure, data and calibration. International Resources Group. http://www.nescaum.org/topics/ne-markal-model/ne-markal-model-documents ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gullett, B., R. Dodder, I. Gilmour, M. Hays, J. Kinsey, W. Linak, D. Loughlin, L. Oudejans, T. Yelverton, G. Wood, M. Toney, A. Touati, J. Aurell, S.-H. Cho, and S. Sidhu. 2012. Environmental, Energy Market and Health Characterization of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heater Technologies. Final Report. Albany, NY: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA).
   Google Scholar
• Haberl, J., C. Culip, B. Yazdani, D. Gilman, T. Fitzpatrick, S. Muns, M. Verdict, M. Ahmed, Z. Liu, J. Baltazer-Cervantes, J. Bryant, L. Degelman, and D. Turner. 2004. Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Impact in the Texas Emission Reduction Plan (TERP). ESL-TR-04/12-01. College Station, TX: Energy Systems Laboratory, Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K., Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx. Cambridge (UK) and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2015. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program. http://www.iea-etsap.org/web/index.asp ( accessed March 24, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, D.H., W.G. Benjey, and C.G. Nolte. 2011. ESP v1. 0: Methodology for exploring emission impacts of future scenarios in the United States. Geosci. Model Dev. 4:287–297. doi:10.5194/gmd-4-287-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, D.H., W.H. Yelverton, R. Dodder, and C.A. Miller. 2012. Examining potential technology breakthroughs for mitigating CO2 using an energy system model. Clean Technol. Environ. Pollut. 15:9–20. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0478-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loulou, R., G. Goldstein, and K. Noble. 2004. Documentation for the MARKAL family of models. Energy Technology Perspectives Programme. http://www.iea-etsap.org/web/MrklDoc-I_StdMARKAL.pdf ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Michalek, J.J., M. Chester, P. Jaramillo, C. Samaras, C.-S.N. Shiau, and L.B. Lave. 2011. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and displacement benefits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:16554–16558. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104473108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2012. Renewable Electricity Futures Study, ed. M.M. Hand, S. Baldwin, E. DeMeo, J.M. Reilly, T. Mai, D. Arent, G. Porro, M. Meshek, and D. Sandor. NREL/TP-6A20-52409. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/re_futures/ ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM). 2014. Final Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: State’s Perspectives on EPA’s Roadmap to Incorporate Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy in NAAQS State Implementation Plans—Three Case Studies, revised. Boston, MA: Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S., S. Pachauri, F. Dentener, P. Kinney, Z. Klimont, K. Riahi, and W. Schoepp. 2013. Better air for better health: Forging synergies in policies for energy access, climate change and air pollution. Global Environ. Change 23:1122–1130. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Inc. (RGGI). 2013. Model rule: Part XX CO2 budget trading program. http://www.rggi.org/docs/ProgramReview/_FinalProgramReviewMaterials/Model_Rule_FINAL.pdf ( accessed February 21, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Saha, B., B. Galef, L. Browning, and J. Staudt. 2005. The Clean Air Act Amendments: Spurring innovation and growth while cleaning the air. Report by ICF Consulting, Inc., Fairfax, VA, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Introduction to sensitivity analysis. In Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, 1–51. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470725184.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P.J.H. 1991. When and how to use scenario planning: A heuristic approach with illustration. J. Forecast. 10:549–564. doi:10.1002/for.3980100602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. 1997. The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M.J., D.S. Daly, Y. Zhou, J.S. Rice, P.L. Patel, H.C. McJeon, G.P. Kyle, S.H. Kim, J. Eom, and L.E. Clarke. 2014. Evaluating sub-national building-energy efficiency policy options under uncertainty: Efficient sensitivity testing of alternative climate, technological and socioeconomic futures in a regional integrated-assessment model. Energy Econ. 43(C):22–33. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, W., P. Sullivan, T. Mai, M. Mowers, C. Uriarte, N. Blair, D. Heimiller, and A. Martinez. 2011. Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS). NREL/TP-6A20-46534. Boulder, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sioshansi, R., and P. Denholm. 2009. Emission impacts and benefits of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid services. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:1199–1204. doi:10.1021/es802324j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (STAPPA/ALAPCO). 1999. Reducing Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollution: A Menu of Harmonized Options. Final Report. Washington, DC: State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators/Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials.
   Google Scholar
• State of California. 2013. 2013 ZEV Action Plan: A Roadmap Toward 1.5 Million Zero-Emission Vehicles on California Roadways by 2025. Sacramento, CA: Governor’s Interagency Working Group on Zero-Emission Vehicles, Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. http://opr.ca.gov/docs/Governor’s_Office_ZEV_Action_Plan_(02-13).pdf ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Talab, N. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Tonn, B., and J.H. Peretz. 2007. State-level benefits of energy efficiency. Energy Policy 35:3665–3674. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Court of Appeals. 2014. USCA Case #11-1302, Doc. #1518738, filed 23 Oct. 2014, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2009. The National Energy Modeling System: An Overview 2009. DOE/EIA-0581(2009). Washington, DC: Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/overview/pdf/0581(2009).pdf ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014. Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040. DOE/EIA-0383(2014). Washington, DC: Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2014).pdf ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Final Ozone NAAQS Regulatory Impact Analysis. EPA-452/R-08-003. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010a. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions And Sinks: 1990–2012. EPA 430-R-10-006. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010b. Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES): User Guide for MOVES2010a. EPA-420-B-10-036. Washington, DC: Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Assessing the Multiple Benefits of Clean Energy: A Resource for States. EPA-430-R-11-014. Washington, DC: Technical Information Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Menu of Control Measures. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/air/pdfs/MenuOfControlMeasures.pdf (accessed May 28, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. EPA U.S. Nine-Region MARKAL Database: Database Documentation. EPA 600/B-13/203. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100I4RX.PDF?Dockey=P100I4RX.PDF ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014a. AVoided Emissions and geneRation Tool (AVERT): User Manual Version 1.2. Washington, DC: Office of Atmospheric Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/avert ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014b. Carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: Electric utility generating units; Proposed rule. 20 CRF Part 60. Fed. Regist. 79(117):34830–34958.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014c. Control Measures Database (CMDB). Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ttnecas1/cost.htm ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014d. Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards Final Rule—Regulatory Impact Analysis. EPA-420-R-14-005. Washington, DC: Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014e. Download WebFIRE Data in Bulk. Research Triangle Park, NC: Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emission Factors, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://cfpub.epa.gov/webfire/index.cfm?action=fire.downloadInBulk. ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014f. National Ambient Air Quality Standards For Ozone (Proposed Rule). EPA-HQ-2008-0699, FRL-9918-43-OAR. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 25.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014g. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Proposed Revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ground-Level Ozone. EPA-452/P-14-006. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/20141125ria.pdf ( accessed December 10, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014h. Technical Support Document (TSD): Preparation of Emissions Inventories for the Version 6.1, 2011 Emissions Modeling Platform. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015a. National Emission Inventory (NEI) air pollution emissions trends data. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/index.html ( accessed May 28, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015b. Past EPA modeling applications. http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/programs/ipm/past-modeling.html ( accessed May 28, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Y. Wu, and A. Elgowainy. 2007. Operating Manual for GREET: Version 1.7. ANL/ESD/05-3. Lemont, IL: Transportation Technology R&D Center, Argonne National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, M., J. Greenblatt, S. Donovan, J. Nelson, A. Meliva, J. Johnston, and D. Kammen. 2013. Scenarios for Meeting California’s 2050 Climate Goals—California’s Carbon Challenge Phase II, Volume 1: Non-electricity Sectors and Overall Scenario Results. CEC-500-YYYY-XXX. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and the University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar