1,271
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Evaluation of low wind modeling approaches for two tall-stack databases

, , , &
Pages 1341-1353 | Received 17 Mar 2015, Accepted 11 Aug 2015, Published online: 20 Oct 2015

References

  • Anfossi, D., D. Oettl, G. Degrazia, and A. Goulart. 2005. An analysis of sonic anemometer observations in low wind speed conditions. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 114:179–203. doi:10.1007/s10546-004-1984-4
  • Barad, M.L. 1958. Project Prairie Grass, a field program in diffusion. Geophys. Res. Pap. 59. Bedford, MA: Air Force Cambridge Centre.
  • Brett, A.C., and S.E. Tuller. 1991. The autocorrelation of hourly wind speed observations. J. Appl. Meteorol. 30:823–33. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030%3C0823:TAOHWS%3E2.0.CO;2
  • Chambers, J.M., W.S. Cleveland, B. Kleiner, and P.A. Tukey. 1983. Comparing data distributions. Graphical methods for data analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Bell Laboratories. Wadsworth International Group and Duxbury Press.
  • Chowdhury, B., R.I. Sykes, D. Henn, and P. Karamchandani. 2014. SCICHEM Version 3.0 (Beta 2) technical documentation. http://sourceforge.net/projects/epri-dispersion/files/SCICHEM/SCICHEM3.0b2.zip/download
  • Cimorelli, A.J., S.G. Perry, A. Venkatram, J.C. Weil, R.J. Paine, R.B. Wilson, R.F. Lee, W.D. Peters, and R.W. Brode. 2005. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J. Appl. Meteorol. 44:682–93. doi:10.1175/JAM2227.1
  • Electric Power Research Institute. 2013. Sub Hourly AERMOD Run Procedure (SHARP), version 13011 user’s guide. Research project 1025622. http://sourceforge.net/projects/epri-dispersion/files/SHARP (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • Etling, D. 1990. On plume meandering under stable stratification. Atmos. Environ. 8:1979–85. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(90)90232-C
  • Hanna, S.R. 1990. Lateral dispersion in light-wind stable conditions, Nuovo Cimento 13:889–94. doi:10.1007/BF02514777
  • Irwin, J.S. 2014. A suggested method for dispersion model evaluation. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64(3):255–64. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.833147
  • Kaplan, M., and R.J. Paine. 2012. Comparison of AERMOD modeled 1-hour SO2 concentrations to observations at multiple monitoring stations in North Dakota. Presented at the 105th Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Air & Waste Management Association, June 2012, San Antonio, TX.
  • Luhar, A.K., and K.N. Rayner. 2009. Methods to estimate surface fluxes of momentum and heat from routine weather observations for dispersion applications under stable stratification. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 132:437–54. doi:10.1007/s10546-009-9409-z
  • Mahrt, L. 1998. Stratified atmospheric boundary layers and breakdown of models. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 11:263–79. doi:10.1007/s001620050093
  • Paine, R., J.A. Connors, and C.D. Szembek, 2010. AERMOD low wind speed evaluation study: Results and implementation. Paper 2010-A-631-AWMA. Presented at the 103rd Annual Conference, Air & Waste Management Association, June 2012, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Paine, R., F. Tringale, and S. Gossett, 2013. Resolution of 1-hour SO2 non-attainment area in Kingsport, TN: Advanced meteorological and monitoring study. Presented at the Air & Waste Management Association’s Specialty Conference. Raleigh, NC, March.
  • Pasquill, F., and F.B. Smith. 1983. Atmospheric Diffusion. Series in Environmental Science. Ellis Horwood. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Perez, I., M. Garcia, M. Sanchez, and B. De Torre. 2004. Autocorrelation analysis of meteorological data from a RASS Sodar. J. Appl. Meteorol., 43:1213–23. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043%3C1213:AAOMDF%3E2.0.CO;2
  • Perry, S.G., A.J. Cimorelli, R.J. Paine, R.W. Brode, J.C. Weil, A. Venkatram, R.B. Wilson, R.F. Lee, and W.D. Peters. 2005. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: Model performance against 17 field study databases. J. Appl. Meteorol. 44:694–708. doi:10.1175/JAM2228.1
  • Qian, W., and A. Venkatram. 2011. Performance of steady-state dispersion models under low wind-speed conditions. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 138:475–91. doi:10.1007/s10546-010-9565-1
  • Rayner, K. 2013. Personal communication with Robert Paine, AECOM.
  • Sagendorf, J.F., and C.R. Dickson. 1974. Diffusion under low windspeed, inversion conditions. NOAA Technical Memorandum 52. http://www.arl.noaa.gov/documents/reports/ARL-52.pdf (accessed September 9, 2015).
  • Smedman, A.S. 1988. Observations of a multi-level turbulence structure in a very stable atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 66:105–26. doi:10.1007/BF00116064
  • Strimaitis, D., E. Insley, M. Korc, and F. Lurmann. 1993. User’s guide for the Model Evaluation Methodology (MEM) system for comparing model performance, Version 1.0. STI-93261-1392-FR. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
  • Szembek, C., R. Paine, and S. Gossett. 2013. Resolution of 1-hour SO2 non-attainment area in Kingsport, TN: Model evaluation analysis results to date. Presented at the Air & Waste Management Association’s Specialty Conference, Raleigh, NC, March.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. AERMOD: Description of model formulation. EPA-454/R-03-004. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/7thconf/aermod/aermod_mfd.pdf (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Revision to the guideline on air quality models: Adoption of a preferred general purpose (flat and complex terrain) dispersion model and other revisions. Final rule. Fed. Reg. 70 (216). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2005-11-09/html/05-21627.htm (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. AERMOD implementation guide (AIG). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/7thconf/aermod/aermod_implmtn_guide_19March2009.pdf (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. AERMET 12345 model change bulletin MCB#3. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/7thconf/aermod/aermet_mcb3.txt (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013a. Personal communication from Roger Brode, EPA, to Robert Paine, AECOM.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013b. Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program. http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/qa/QA-Handbook-Vol-II.pdf (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014a. Webinar: AERMOD modeling system update, January 15. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/webinar/AERMOD_13350_Update/AERMOD_System_Update_Webinar_01-14-2014_FINAL.pdf (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014b. Webinar: AERMOD modeling system update, August 14. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/webinar/AERMOD_14134-NO2_Memo/20140812-Webinar_Slides.pdf (accessed June 10, 2015).
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Approval of alternative model request: Modeling of sulfur dioxide emissions from Eastman Chemical Company, Sullivan County, Tennessee, 2010 Sulfur dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) nonattainment area. Letter to Mr. Barry R. Stephens, Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation from Beverly H. Bannister, Director of Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division (EPA Region 4).
  • Van der Hoven, I. 1976. A survey of field measurements of atmospheric diffusion under low-wind-speed inversion conditions. Nuclear Safety 17:223–30.
  • Venkatram, A., R.W. Brode, A.J. Cimorelli, J.T. Lee, R.J. Paine, S.G. Perry, W.D. Peters, J.C. Weil, and R.B. Wilson. 2001. A complex terrain dispersion model for regulatory applications. Atmos. Environ. 35:4211–21. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00186-8
  • Wilson, R.B., G.E. Start, C.R. Dickson, and N.R. Ricks. 1976. Diffusion under low wind speed conditions near Oak Ridge, Tennessee. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL ARL-61, 83 pp. http://www.arl.noaa.gov/documents/reports/ARL-61.pdf (accessed September 9, 2015).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.