Cooperation control strategies for China’s cross-region pollution in a lake basin based on green reduction cost

References

• Bayramoglu, B. 2006. Transboundary pollution in the Black Sea: Comparison of institutional arrangements. Environ. Resour. Econ. 35:289–325. doi:10.1007/s10640-006-9016-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X., Y. Zhao, F. Wu, Y. Lin, Q. Lu, and J. Dai. 2011. Analysis of the trade-off between economic growth and the reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus pollutions in the Poyang Lake Watershed, China. Ecol. Model. 222:330–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, L. 2013. Transboundary water institutions in action. Water. Resour. Econ. 1:20–35. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2013.03.005.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D., H. Zhang, G. Qian, and L. Xu. 2012. An improved two-step method for solving generalized Nash equilibrium problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216:613–623. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, S. 2013. China: Goodbye, GDP. http://www.china.org.cn/china/third_plenary_session/2013-11/10/content_30554427.htm ( accessed April 6, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., and Q. Qiang. 2013. An equilibrium model of online shopping supply chain networks with service capacity investment. Serv. Sci. 5:238–248. doi:10.1287/serv.2013.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M.F., and D. Shaw. 2005. A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 49:83–102. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2004.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucukmehmetoglu, M. 2012. An integrative case study approach between game theory and Pareto frontier concepts for the transboundary water resources allocations. J. Hydrol. 450:308–319. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loáiciga, H.A. 2004. Analytic game—Theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. J. Hydrol. 297:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani, K. 2010. Game theory and water resources. J. Hydrol. 381:225–238. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjouri, N., and M. Ardestani. 2010. A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues. Environ. Monit. Assess. 167:527–544. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1070-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansur, E.T. 2013. Prices versus quantities: Environmental regulation and imperfect competition. J. Regul. Econ. 44:80–102. doi:10.1007/s11149-013-9219-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesbah, S.M., R. Kerachian, and A. Torabian. 2010. Trading pollutant discharge permits in rivers using fuzzy nonlinear cost functions. Desalination 250:313–317. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, W.D. 1972. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J. Econ. Theory 5:395–418. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagurney, A., J. Dong, and D. Zhang. 2002. A supply chain network equilibrium model. Transport. Res. 38E:281–303. doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00020-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pham Do, K.H., A., Dinar, and D. McKinney. 2012. Transboundary water management: Can issue linkage help mitigate externalities? Int. Game Theory Rev. 14:1250002. doi:10.1142/S0219198912500028.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, C.S., W. Chen, J. Bi, L. Huang, and F.Y. Li. 2011. Ecological risk assessment of pesticide residues in Taihu Lake wetland, China. Ecol. Model. 222:287–292. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raquel, S., S. Ferenc, C. Emery, and R. Abraham. 2007. Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. J. Environ. Manage. 84:560–571. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities Times Online, China. 2014. Financial news. http://finance.ifeng.com/a/20141126/13307986_0.shtml ( accessed April 6, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Song, M., W. Zhang, and X. Qiu. 2012. Pollutions trading system and supporting policies under an pollutions reduction framework. Ann. Oper. Res. doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1152-z.
   Google Scholar
• Taschini, L. 2010. Environmental economics and modeling marketable permits. Asia Pac. Finan. Markets 17:325–343. doi:10.1007/s10690-009-9108-2.
   Google Scholar
• Varis, O., C. Tortajada, and A.K. Biswas. 2008. Management of Transboundary Rivers and Lakes. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• You, L., Y.P. Li, G.H. Huang, and J.L. Zhang. 2014. Modeling regional ecosystem development under uncertainty—A case study for New Binhai District of Tianjin. Ecol. Model. 288:127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. 2006. A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition. Omega 34:283–295. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Y. Qian, R. Huang, C. Li, J. Xue, and Y. Hu. 2012. Model of transfer tax on transboundary water pollution in China’s river basin. Oper. Res. Lett. 40:218–222. doi:10.1016/j.orl.2012.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar