The FireWork air quality forecast system with near-real-time biomass burning emissions: Recent developments and evaluation of performance for the 2015 North American wildfire season

References

• Alaska Interagency Coordination Center. 2015. Alaska Interagency Coordination Center 2015 fall fire review statistics summary. http://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/intel.php (accessed December 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Saadi, J., A.J. Soja, R.B. Pierce, J. Szykman, C. Wiedinmyer, L. Emmons, S. Kondragunta, X. Zhang, C. Kittaka, T. Schaack, and K. Bowman. 2008. Intercomparison of near-real-time biomass burning emissions estimates constrained by satellite fire data. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2(1): 021504. doi:10.1117/1.2948785
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G.K., D.V. Sandberg, and R.A. Norheim. 2004. Fire Emission Production Simulator (FEPS) User’s Guide. USDA Forest Service 99, Seattle, WA. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/fera/feps/FEPS_users_guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K.R., P. Englefield, J.M. Little, and G. Reuter. 2009. An approach to operational forest fire growth predictions for Canada. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18:893–905. doi:10.1071/WF08046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonopoulos, S., P. Bourgouin, J. Montpetit, and G. Croteau. 2010. Forecasting O3, PM2.5 and NO2 hourly spot concentrations using an updatable MOS methodology. Proc. 31st NATO/SPS ITM on Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application, 27 September–1 October 2010, Turin, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G.A. 1975. Plume rise predictions. In Lectures on Air Pollution and Environmental Impact Analysis, D.A. Haugen, ed. 59–111. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Canada Gazette. 2013. Amendment to Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Canada Gazette, Part I 147(21): 17–20, May 25. http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2013/2013-05-25/html/notice-avis-eng.html#d106 (accessed December 13, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Carolina Environmental Programs. 2012. Sparse matrix operator kernel emission. Modeling system. University of Carolina, Carolina Environmental Programs, Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.cmascenter.org/smoke (accessed December 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Charron, M., S. Polavarapu, M. Buehner, P.A. Vaillancourt, C. Charrette, M. Roch, J. Morneau, L. Garand, J.M. Aparicio, S. MacPherson, S. Pellerin, J. St-James, and S. Heilliette. 2012. The stratospheric extension of the Canadian global deterministic medium-range weather forecasting system and its impact on tropospheric forecasts. Month. Weather Rev. 140:1924–44. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00097.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., V. Bouchet, S. Cousineau, D. Davignon, A. Duhamel, S. Gilbert, S. Ménard, J. Racine, M. Samaali and M. Sassi. 2010. 2006 Annual operational evaluation of the Environment Canada Air Quality Modelling System. 9th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC. https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2010/abstracts/chen_2006_annual_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. 2015. Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre current fire situation report. http://www.ciffc.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=25&Itemid=27 (accessed December 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Côté, J., S. Gravel, A. Méthot, A. Patoine, M. Roch, and A. Staniforth. 1998a. The operational CMC/MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model. Part 1. Design considerations and formulation, Month. Weather Rev. 126:1373–95. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126%3C1373: TOCMGE%3E2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, J., J.-G. Desmarais, S. Gravel, A. Méthot, A. Patoine, M. Roch, and A. Staniforth. 1998b. The operational CMC-MRB Global Environment Multiscale (GEM) model. Part 2. Results. Month. Weather Rev. 126:1397–418. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126%3C1397: TOCMGE%3E2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottle, P., K. Strawbridge, and I. McKendry. 2014. Long-range transport of Siberian wildfire smoke to British Columbia: Lidar observations and air quality impacts. Atmos. Environ. 90:71–77. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J., and M.O. Andreae. 1990. Biomass burning in the tropics: Impact on atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles. Science 250:1669–78. doi:10.1126/science.250.4988.1669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J, L. Heidt, J. Krasnec, W. Pollock, and W. Seiler. 1979. Biomass burning as a source of atmospheric gases CO, H2, N2O, NO, CH3Cl and COS. Nature 282(5736): 253–56. doi:10.1038/282253a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damoah R., N. Spichtinger, R. Servranckx, M. Fromm, E.W. Eloranta, I.A. Razenkov, P. James, M. Shulski, C. Forster, and A. Stohl. 2006. A case study of pyro-convection using transport model and remote sensing data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6:173–85. doi:10.5194/acp-6-173-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmenov, A., and A. da Silva. 2013. The quick fire emissions dataset (QFED)—Documentation of versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4. NASA Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA TM-2013-104606, 32, 183, Greenbelt, MD. doi:10.1007/978-1-935704-23-2
   Google Scholar
• de Groot W.J., J.M. Pritchard, and T.J. Lynham. 2009. Forest floor fuel consumption and carbon emissions in Canadian boreal forest fires. Can. J. For. Res. 39:367–82. doi:10.1139/X08-192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecological Stratification Working Group. 1995. A national ecological framework for Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of Environment Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• El-Harbawi, M. 2013. Air quality modelling, simulation, and computational methods: A review. Environ. Rev. 21(3): 149–79. doi:10.1139/er-2012-0056
   Google Scholar
• Emmons, L.K., S. Walters, P.G. Hess, J.-F. Lamarque, G.G. Pfister, D. Fillmore, C. Granier, A. Guenther, D. Kinnison, T. Laepple, J. Orlando, X. Tie, G. Tyndall, C. Wiedinmyer, S.L. Baughcum, and S. Kloster, S., 2010. Description and evaluation of the model for ozone and related chemical tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev. 3:43–67. doi:10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannigan, M., A.S. Cantin, W.J. de Groot, M. Wotton, A. Newbery, and L.M. Gowman, 2013. Global wildland fire season severity in the 21st century. For. Ecol. Manage. 294:54–61. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group. 1992. Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. Science and Sustainable Development Directorate, Information Report ST-X-3, Vol. 3. Forestry Canada, Science and Sustainable Development Directorate, Ottawa, Canada. http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/10068.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, S.R., K.M. Longo, R. Chatfield, D. Latham, M.A.F. Silva Dias, M.O. Andreae, E. Prins., J.C. Santos, R. Gielow, and J.A. Carvalho, Jr. 2007. Including the sub-grid scale plume rise of vegetation fires in low resolution atmospheric transport models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7:3385–98, doi:10.5194/acp-7-3385-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm M., and R. Servranckx. 2003. Transport of forest fire smoke above the tropopause by supercell convection. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30:1542. doi:10.1029/2002GL016820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm M., R. Bevilacqua, R. Servranckx, J. Rosen, J. Thayer, J. Herman, and D. Larko. 2005. Pyrocumulonimbus injection of smoke to the stratosphere: Observations and impact of a super blowup in northwestern Canada on 3–4 August 1998. J. Geophys. Res. 110:D08205. doi:10.1029/2004JD005350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatebe, C.K., T. Varnai, R. Poudyal, C. Ichoku, and M.D. King. 2012. Taking the pulse of pyrocumulus clouds. Atmos. Environ. 52:121. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglio, L, J. Descloitres, C.O. Justice, and Y.J. Kaufman. 2003. An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 87(2): 273–82. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis M.D., A.Y. Omule, and T. Brierley, 2005. Monitoring Canada’s forests: The National Forest Inventory. For. Chron. 81:214–21. doi:10.5558/tfc81214-2
   Google Scholar
• Gong, S.L., L.A. Barrie, J.-P. Blanchet, K. von Salzen, U. Lohmann, G. Lesins, L. Spacek, L.M. Zhang, E. Girard, H. Lin, R. Leaitch, H. Leighton, P. Chylek, and P. Huang, 2003. Canadian Aerosol Module: A size segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models: Part 1. Module development. J. Geophys. Res., 108(D1): 4007. doi:10.1029/2001JD002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, S.R., A.G. Russell, J.G. Wilkinson, J. Vukovich, and D.A. Hansen. 2005. Monte Carlo estimation of uncertainties in BEIS3 emission outputs and their effects on uncertainties in chemical transport model predictions. J. Geophys. Res. 110:D01302. doi:10.1029/2004JD004986
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, W.E., Y. Liu, S. Urbanski, V. Kovalev, and R. Mickler. 2014. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Plume rise, atmospheric transport, and chemistry processes. For. Ecol. Manage. 317:70–79. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson B.S., M. Brauer, Y.C. MacNab, and S.M. Kennedy. 2011. Three measures of forest fire smoke exposure and their associations with respiratory and cardiovascular health outcomes in a population-based cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 119:1266–71. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron-Thorpe, F.L., G.H. Mount, L. Emmons, B.K. Lamb, S.H. Chung, and J.K. Vaughan. 2012. Regional air-quality forecasting for the Pacific Northwest using MOPITT/TERRA assimilated carbon monoxide MOZART-4 forecasts as a near real-time boundary condition, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12:5603–15. doi:10.5194/acp-12-5603-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, U., R. Bianconi, E. Solazzo, I. Kioutsioukis, A. Badia, A. Balzarini, R. Baro, R. Bellasio, D. Brunner, C. Chemel, G. Curci, J. Flemming, R. Forkel, L. Giordano, P. Jimenez-Guerrero, M. Hirtl, A. Hodzic, L. Honzak, O. Jorba, C. Knote, J.J.P. Kuenen, P.A. Makar, A. Manders-Groot, L. Neal, J.L. Perez, G. Pirovano, G. Pouliot, R. San Jose, N. Savage, W. Schroder, R.S. Sokhi, D. Syrakov, A. Torian, P. Tuccella, K. Werhahn, R. Wolke, K. Yahya, R. Zabkar, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, J., C. Hogrefe, and S. Galmarini. 2015. Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: Ozone. Atmos. Environ. 115:404–20. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, ed. R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, D., and N. Wigder. 2012. Ozone production from wildfires: A critical review. Atmos. Environ. 51:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J. W., A. Heil, M. O. Andreae, A. Benedetti, N. Chubarova, L. Jones, J-J. Morcrette, M. Razinger, M.G. Schultz, M. Suttie, and G.R. van der Werf. 2012. Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power. Biogeosciences 9:527–54. doi:10.5194/bg-9-527-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, J., T. Olsson, D.M. Schultz, A. Baklanov, T. Klein, A.I. Miranda, A. Monteiro, M. Hirtl, V. Tarvainen, M. Boy, V.-H. Peuch, A. Poupkou, I. Kioutsioukis, S. Finardi, M. Sofiev, R. Sokhi, K.E.J. Lehtinen, K. Karatzas, R. San José, M. Astitha, G. Kallos, M. Schaap, E. Reimer, H. Jakobs, and K. Eben. 2012. A review of operational, regional-scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12:1–87. doi:10.5194/acp-12-1-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, N.K., S.M. O’Neill, R. Solomon, S. Raffuse, T. Strand, D. Sullivan, C. Krull, M. Rorig, J. Peterson, and S.A. Ferguson. 2009, The BlueSky smoke modeling framework. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18:906–20. doi:10.1071/WF07086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B.S., M.E. Alexander, B.C. Hawkes, T.J. Lynham, B.J. Stocks, and P. Englefield. 2002. Information systems in support of wildland fire management decision-making in Canada. Comput. Electron. Agric. 37:185–98. doi:10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00120-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y., S.L. Goodrick, and J.A. Stanturf. 2013. Future U.S. wildfire potential trends projected using a dynamically downscaled climate change scenario. For. Ecol. Manage. 294:120–35. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J.C., G. Pereira, S.A. Uhl, M.A. Bravo, and M.L. Bell. 2015. A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke, Environ. Res. (136):120–32. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurmann, F.W., and W.R. Stockwell. 1989. Intercomparison of the ADOM and RADM gas-phase chemical mechanisms. Electrical Power Research Institute Topical Report. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Mahfouf, J.-F., B. Brasnett, and S. Gagnon. 2007. A Canadian precipitation analysis (CaPA) project: Description and preliminary results. Atmos. Ocean 45:1–17. doi:10.3137/ao.v450101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makar, P.A., W. Gong, C. Mooney, J. Zhang, D. Davignon, M. Samaali, M.D. Moran, H. He, D.W. Tarasick, D. Sills, and J. Chen. 2010. Dynamic adjustment of climatological ozone boundary conditions for air-quality forecasts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10(8): 997–1015. doi:10.5194/acpd-10-13643-2010
   Google Scholar
• Mason, I. 2003. Binary events. In Forecast Verification: A Practitioner’s Guide in Atmospheric Science, ed. I.T. Jolliffe and D.B. Stephenson, 37–76. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, R. 2008. Estimating the impact of the 2004 Alaskan forest fires on episodic particulate matter pollution over the eastern United States through assimilation of satellite-derived aerosol optical depths in a regional air quality model. J. Geophys. Res. 113:D17302. doi:10.1029/2007JD009767
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S.R. 2015. Using prescribed fire to reduce the risk of smoke related traffic problems on I-95. In Proceedings of The Large Wildland Fires Conference; May 19-23, 2014; Missoula, MT. Proc. RMRS-P-73, ed. R.E. Keane, M. Jolly R. Parsons, and K. Riley, 163–67. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D.J., K. Sun, M.A. Zondlo, D. Kanter, O. Dubovik, E.J. Welton, D.M. Winker, and P. Ginoux. 2011. Assessing boreal forest fire smoke aerosol impacts on U.S. air quality: A case study using multiple data sets. J. Geophys. Res. 116:D22209. doi:10.1029/2011JD0161
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M.D., S. Ménard, R. Pavlovic, D. Anselmo, S. Antonopoulos, P.A. Makar, W. Gong, C. Stroud, J. Zhang, Q. Zheng, A. Robichaud, H. Landry, P.-A. Beaulieu, S. Gilbert, J. Chen, and A. Kallaur. 2012. Recent advances in Canada’s National Operational AQ Forecasting System. Proc. 32nd NATO/SPS ITM on Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application, 7–11 May 2012, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 215–20.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M., Q. Zheng, J. Zhang, and R. Pavlovic. 2015. RAQDPS version 013: Upgrades to the CMC Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System. June. http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmoi/product_guide/docs/lib/op_systems/doc_opchanges/ (accessed December 2, 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Riccardi, C.L., S.J. Prichard, D.V. Sandberg, and R.D. Ottmar. 2007. Quantifying physical characteristics of wildland fuels using the Fuel Characteristic Classification System. Can. J. Forest Res. 37(12): 2413–20. doi:10.1139/X07-175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robichaud, A., and R. Ménard. 2014. Multi-year objective analyses of warm season ground-level ozone and PM2.5 over North America using real-time observations and Canadian operational air quality models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14:1769–800, doi:10.5194/acp-14-1769-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolph, G.D., R.R. Draxler, A.F. Stein, A.Taylor, M.G. Ruminski, S.Kondragunta, J. Zeng, H-C. Huang, G. Manikin, J.T. McQueen, and P.M. Davidson. 2009. Description and verification of the NOAA smoke forecasting system: The 2007 fire season. Weather Forecast. 24(2): 361–78. doi:10.1175/2008WAF2222165.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saide, P. E., D. Peterson, D., A. da Silva, B. Anderson, L. D. Ziemba, G. Diskin, G. Sachse, J. Hair, C. Butler, M. Fenn, J. L. Jimenez, P. Campuzano-Jost, A. Perring, J. Schwarz, M. Z. Markovic, P. Russell, J. Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, D. G. Streets, F. Yan, J. Dibb, R. Yokelson, O. B. Toon, E. Hyer, and G.R. Carmichael. 2015. Revealing important nocturnal and day-to-day variations in fire smoke emissions through a novel multiplatform inversion, Geophys. Res. Lett. 42:3609–18, doi:10.1002/2015GL063737, 2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schigas, R., and R. Stull. 2013. BlueSky Canada Part 3—BlueSky Canada wildfire smoke: Status at UBC. Can. Smoke Newslett. 2013:29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sessions, W.R., H.E. Fuelberg, R.A. Kahn, and D.M. Winker. 2011. An investigation of methods for injecting emissions from boreal wildfires using WRF-Chem during ARCTAS. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11:5719–44. doi:10.5194/acp-11-5719-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, B., P. Englefield, and K. Anderson. 2010. Fuel-type mapping for the CWFIS: Past, present, and future. Can. Smoke Newslett. Spring/Summer:4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Spracklen, D.V., L.J. Mickley, J.A. Logan, R.C. Hudman, R. Yevich, M.D. Flannigan, and A.L. Westerling. 2009. Impacts of climate change from 2000 to 2050 on wildfire activity and carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in the western United States. J. Geophys. Res. 114:D20301. doi:10.1029/2008JD010966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajner, I., P. Davidson, D. Byun, J. McQueen, R. Draxler, P. Dickerson, and J. Meagher. 2012. U.S. national air quality forecast capability: expanding coverage to include particulate matter. Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXI, 379–84. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stanski R.H., L.J. Wilson, and W.R. Burrows, 1989. Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. Atmospheric Research, Environment Canada. Research Report no. (MSRB) 89-5. www.cawcr.gov.au/projects/verification/Stanski_et…/Stanski_et_al.html
   Google Scholar
• Stieb, D.M., R.T. Burnett, M. Smith-Doiron, O. Brion, H. Hyun Shin, and V. Economou. 2008. A new multipollutant, no-threshold air quality health index based on short-term associations observed in daily time-series analyses. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 58:435–501. doi:10.3155-1047-3289.58.3.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocks, B.J, B.D. Lawson, M.E. Alexander, C.E. Van Wagner, R.S. McAlpine R.S., T.J. Lynham, and D.E. Dubé. 1989. The Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System: An overview. For. Chron. 65: 450–57. doi:10.5558/tfc65258-4
   Google Scholar
• Van Wagner C.E. 1987. Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Forestry Service, Forestry Technology Report 35.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X., D.K. Thompson, G.A. Marshall, C. Tymstra, R. Carr, and M.D. Flannigan. 2015. Increasing frequency of extreme fire weather in Canada with climate change. Climatic Change 30(4): 573–86. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1375-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western Regional Air Partnership. 2005. 2002 Fire Emission Inventory for the WRAP Region—Phase II, Project No. 178-6. http://www.wrapair.org/forums/fejf/documents/WRAP_2002_PhII_EI_Report_20050722.pdf (accessed December 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wiedinmyer, C., S.K. Akagi, R.J. Yokelson, L.K. Emmons, J.A. Al-Saadi, J.J. Orlando, and A.J. Soja. 2011. The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): A high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geosci. Model Dev. 4:625–41. doi:10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, L.J., and M. Vallée. 2002. The Canadian Updateable Model Output Statistics (UMOS) system: design and development tests. Weather Forecast. 17:206–22. doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0206: TCUMOS>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, E.K. 2008. Meteorologically influenced wildfire impacts on urban particulate matter and visibility in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 17:214–23. doi:10.1071/WF06111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., M. Bocquet, V. Mallet, C. Seigneur, and A. Baklanov. 2012a. Real-time air quality forecasting, part I: History, techniques, and current status. Atmos. Environ. 60:632–55. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., M. Bocquet, V. Mallet, C. Seigneur, and A. Baklanov. 2012b. Real-time air quality forecasting, part II: State of the science, current research needs, and future prospects. Atmos. Environ. 60:656–76. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., S. Kondragunta, J. Ram, C. Schmidt, and H.-C. Huang. 2012c. Near-real-time global biomass burning emissions product from geostationary satellite constellation, J. Geophys. Res. 117:D14201. doi:10.1029/2012JD017459
   Google Scholar