Microscale air quality impacts of distributed power generation facilities

References

• Allison, J.E., and J. Lents. 2002. Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: Can we have our cake and eat it too? Energy Policy 30:737–52. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00135-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2010. Final Determination of Compliance: Mariposa Energy Project. Application 20737, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bivens, R.J. 2002. Startup and shutdown NO_x emissions from combined-cycle combustion turbine units. Presented at the EPRI CEM User Group Meeting, May 24, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Borbely, A.-M., and J.F. Kreider. 2001. Distributed Generation: The Power Paradigm for the New Millennium. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. doi:10.1080/00022470.1965.10468404
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, G.A. 1965. A plume rise model compared with observations. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 15:433–38. doi:10.1080/00022470.1965.10468404
   Google Scholar
• Carreras-Sospedra, M., D. Dabdub, J. Brouwer, E. Knipping, N. Kumar, K. Darrow, A. Hampson, and B. Hedman. 2008. Air quality impacts of distributed energy resources implemented in the northeastern United States. J. Air and Waste Management Assoc. 58:902–12. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.58.7.902
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, S., X. Ren, J. Mao, Z. Chen, W.H. Brune, B. Lefer, B. Rappenglück, J. Flynn, J. Olson, and J. H. Crawford. 2010. A comparison of chemical mechanisms based on TRAMP-2006 field data. Atmos. Environ. 44:4116–25. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Electric Power Research Institute. 2015a. Program on Technology Innovation: Literature Review of the Potential Air Quality Impacts of Fossil-Based Distributed Generation. Final Report 3002005008, Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Electric Power Research Institute. 2015b. Program on Technology Innovation: The Evolving Emissions Profile of Distributed Energy Resources Technology. Final Report 3002004874, Palo Alto, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, G.A., P.W. Granvold, A.S. Hoats, and W.W. Nazaroff. 2006. Intake fraction assessment of the air pollutant exposure implications of a shift toward distributed electricity generation. Atmos. Environ. 40: 7164–7177. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, Q., and A. Venkatram. 2011. The relative impacts of distributed and centralized generation of electricity on local air quality in the South Coast Air Basin of California. Energy Policy 39:4999–5007. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.056
   Google Scholar
• Karl, T., E. Apel, A. Hodzic, D.D. Riemer, D.R. Blake, and C. Wiedinmyer. 2009. Emissions of volatile organic compounds inferred from airborne flux measurements over a megacity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9:271–85. doi:10.5194/acp-9-271-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleffmann, J., R. Kurtenbach, J.C. Lörzer, P. Wiesen, N. Kalthoff, N. Vogel, and B. Vogel. 2003. Measured and simulated vertical profiles of nitrous acid. Part I: field measurements. Atmos. Environ. 37:2949–55. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00242-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.J., K.E. Noll, and T.M. Holsen. 1994. Dry deposition velocities as a function of particle size in the ambient atmosphere. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 20:239–52. doi:10.1080/02786829408959680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., A. Wierman, Y. Chen, B. Razon, and N. Chen. 2013. Data center demand response: Avoiding the coincident peak via workload shifting and local generation. Performance Evaluation 70:770–91. doi:10.1016/j.peva.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2003. Gas-Fired Distributed Energy Resource Technology Characterization. NREL/TP-620-34783, Golden, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Olaguer, E.P. 2012a. The potential near source ozone impacts of upstream oil and gas industry emissions. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62:966–77. doi:10.1080/10962247.2012.688923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaguer, E.P. 2012b. Near source air quality impacts of large olefin flares. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 62:978–88. doi:10.1080/10962247.2012.693054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaguer, E.P. 2013. Application of an adjoint neighborhood-scale chemistry transport model to the attribution of primary formaldehyde at Lynchburg Ferry during TexAQS II. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118:4936–46. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaguer, E.P., S.C. Herndon, B. Buzcu Guven, C.E. Kolb, M.J. Brown, and A.E. Cuclis. 2013. Attribution of primary formaldehyde and sulfur dioxide at Texas City during SHARP/formaldehyde and olefins from large industrial releases (FLAIR) using an adjoint chemistry transport model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118:11317–26. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappenglück, B., G. Lubertino, S. Alvarez, J. Golovko, B. Czader, and L. Ackermann. 2013. Radical precursors and related species from traffic as observed and modeled at an urban highway junction. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 63:1270–86. doi:10.1080/10962247.2013.822438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. 2013. Authority to Construct Application Review: Cogeneration System Consisting of One Natural Gas-Fired Turbine and Duct Burner. July 26, Fresno, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, B., B.S. Hansen, M.J. Brown, and E.R. Pardyjak. 2008. Evaluation of the QUIC-URB fast response urban wind model for a cubical building array and wide building street canyon. Environ. Fluid Mech. 8:281–312. doi:10.1007/s10652-008-9084-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Z., and K.M. Zhang. 2015. The near-source impacts of diesel backup generators in urban environments. Atmos. Environ. 109:262–71. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Protection Agency (EPA). 2014. MOVES 2014a User Guide. EPA-420-B-15-095, Office of Transportation and Air Quality: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• University of California at Riverside. 2005. Air Quality Implications of Backup Generators in California; Volume Two: Emission Measurements from Controlled and Uncontrolled Backup Generators. California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program, CEC 500-2005-049. Riverside, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatram, A., S. Lee, Q. Jing, and W. Qian. 2010. Evaluation of the Near Source Air Quality Impact of Distributed Generation. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research Program, MAQ-07-03: Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Vutukuru, S., M. Carreras-Sospedra, J. Brouwer, and D. Dabdub. 2011. Future impacts of distributed power generation on ambient ozone and particulate matter concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley of California. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 61:1319–33. doi:10.1080/10473289.2011.603990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warneke, C., S.A. McKeen, J.A. de Gouw, P.D. Goldan, W.C. Kuster, J.S. Holloway, E.J. Williams, B.M. Lerner, D.D. Parrish, M. Trainer, F.C. Fehsenfeld, S. Kato, E.L. Atlas, A. Baker, and D.R. Blake. 2007. Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratoips and comparison with an emissions database. J. Geophys. Res. 112:D10S47. doi:10.1029/2006JD007930
   Google Scholar